World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 46 6653 6119 2890 2599 220 9182

Kathryn V. Papp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathryn V. Papp between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathryn V. Papp published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2023. 49 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2023. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 22 publications
1967 2025

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathryn V. Papp: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 5
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
2013 5
2014 8
2015 9
2016 17
2017 21
2018 16
2019 19
2020 27
2021 18
2022 20
2023 38
2024 27
2025 22
Total 258
Download as CSV

Kathryn V. Papp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn V. Papp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 220 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242 220
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathryn V. Papp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn V. Papp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512 46
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathryn V. Papp is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has extensively contributed to the field of medicine, with particular focus on psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and physiology. Their research spans a variety of subfields, including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The primary topics of their work cover areas related to dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments. Additional topics include health, environment, and cognitive aging, cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, frailty in older adults, and neurological disease mechanisms and treatments.

Among recent publications attributed to this researcher are:

  • "In vivo and neuropathology data support locus coeruleus integrity as indicator of Alzheimer's disease pathology and cognitive decline," 2021, Science Translational Medicine
  • "Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • "Defining the Lowest Threshold for Amyloid-PET to Predict Future Cognitive Decline and Amyloid Accumulation," 2020, Neurology
  • "Lower novelty-related locus coeruleus function is associated with Aβ-related cognitive decline in clinically healthy individuals," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Unsupervised mobile cognitive testing for use in preclinical Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Frequent collaborators include Dorene M. Rentz, Reisa A. Sperling, Rebecca E. Amariglio, Keith A. Johnson, and Aaron P. Schultz. These coauthors have contributed to numerous joint research efforts alongside Kathryn V. Papp.

The scientist has published extensively in a number of venues, with a concentration in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Neurology, The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease, and Alzheimer s Research & Therapy.

Best Publications

  • Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease

    Keith A. Johnson;Aaron Schultz;Rebecca A. Betensky;J. Alex Becker

  • Association of Amyloid and Tau With Cognition in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease : A Longitudinal Study

    Bernard J Hanseeuw;Bernard J Hanseeuw;Rebecca A Betensky;Heidi I L Jacobs;Heidi I L Jacobs;Aaron P Schultz

  • Effect of Tai Chi on Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Peter M. Wayne;Peter M. Wayne;Jacquelyn N. Walsh;Jacquelyn N. Walsh;Ruth E. Taylor-Piliae;Rebecca E. Wells

  • Immediate and delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy elderly: a review of current literature and future directions.

    Kathryn V. Papp;Stephen J. Walsh;Peter J. Snyder

  • Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults.

    Rachel F. Buckley;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Jennifer S. Rabin;Timothy J. Hohman

  • Optimizing the preclinical Alzheimer's cognitive composite with semantic processing: The PACC5

    Kathryn V. Papp;Kathryn V. Papp;Dorene M. Rentz;Dorene M. Rentz;Irina Orlovsky;Irina Orlovsky;Reisa A. Sperling;Reisa A. Sperling

  • The impact of amyloid-beta and tau on prospective cognitive decline in older individuals

    Reisa A. Sperling;Reisa A. Sperling;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Aaron P. Schultz;Rebecca A. Betensky

  • Sex, amyloid, and APOE ε4 and risk of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Findings from three well-characterized cohorts.

    Rachel F. Buckley;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Michael J. Properzi

  • Structural tract alterations predict downstream tau accumulation in amyloid-positive older individuals.

    Heidi I. L. Jacobs;Heidi I. L. Jacobs;Trey Hedden;Aaron P. Schultz;Jorge Sepulcre

  • Interactive Associations of Vascular Risk and β-Amyloid Burden With Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Elderly Individuals: Findings From the Harvard Aging Brain Study.

    Jennifer S. Rabin;Aaron P. Schultz;Trey Hedden;Anand Viswanathan

  • In vivo and neuropathology data support locus coeruleus integrity as indicator of Alzheimer's disease pathology and cognitive decline.

    Heidi I. L. Jacobs;Heidi I. L. Jacobs;John A. Becker;Kenneth Kwong;Nina Engels-Domínguez;Nina Engels-Domínguez

  • Harvard Aging Brain Study: Dataset and accessibility

    Alexander Dagley;Molly LaPoint;Willem Huijbers;Trey Hedden

  • Early and late change on the preclinical Alzheimer's cognitive composite in clinically normal older individuals with elevated amyloid β

    Elizabeth C. Mormino;Kathryn V. Papp;Kathryn V. Papp;Dorene M. Rentz;Dorene M. Rentz;Michael C. Donohue

  • Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Fredrik Öhman;Jason Hassenstab;David Berron;David Berron;Michael Schöll;Michael Schöll

  • Fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism associated with tau-amyloid interaction predicts memory decline

    Bernard J. Hanseeuw;Rebecca A. Betensky;Aaron P. Schultz;Kathryn V. Papp;Kathryn V. Papp

  • Depressive Symptoms and Tau Accumulation in the Inferior Temporal Lobe and Entorhinal Cortex in Cognitively Normal Older Adults: A Pilot Study.

    Jennifer R Gatchel;Nancy J Donovan;Joseph J Locascio;Aaron P Schultz

  • PET staging of amyloidosis using striatum

    Bernard J. Hanseeuw;Bernard J. Hanseeuw;Rebecca A. Betensky;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Aaron P. Schultz

  • Development of a Psychometrically Equivalent Short Form of the Face–Name Associative Memory Exam for use Along the Early Alzheimer’s Disease Trajectory

    Kathryn V. Papp;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Maria Dekhtyar;Kamolika Roy

  • Functional network integrity presages cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Rachel F. Buckley;Aaron P. Schultz;Trey Hedden;Kathryn V. Papp

  • Defining the Lowest Threshold for Amyloid-PET to Predict Future Cognitive Decline and Amyloid Accumulation

    Michelle E. Farrell;Shu Jiang;Aaron P. Schultz;Michael J. Properzi

  • Processing speed in normal aging: Effects of white matter hyperintensities and hippocampal volume loss

    Kathryn V. Papp;Richard F. Kaplan;Beth Springate;Nicola Moscufo

Frequent Co-Authors

Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital
Dorene M. Rentz
Dorene M. Rentz Harvard Medical School
Keith A. Johnson
Keith A. Johnson Harvard University
Rebecca Amariglio
Rebecca Amariglio Harvard Medical School
Aaron P. Schultz
Aaron P. Schultz Harvard University
Gad A. Marshall
Gad A. Marshall Brigham and Women's Hospital
Elizabeth C. Mormino
Elizabeth C. Mormino Stanford University
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University
Jasmeer P. Chhatwal
Jasmeer P. Chhatwal Harvard University
Trey Hedden
Trey Hedden Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in neuroscience, a variety of related online degrees and career pathways can complement your education and expand your prospects. Programs in psychology, social work, and counseling offer valuable interdisciplinary skills relevant to neuroscience research and practice.

For those interested in a quick transition into social work, 1 year msw programs online provide a fast-track route to a master’s degree, ideal for career changers or those seeking advanced credentials. Alternatively, students seeking foundational knowledge in mental processes and behavior might pursue a 2-year psychology degree online, which can serve as a stepping stone to graduate-level neuroscience studies or allied professions.

Counseling is another prominent career avenue related to neuroscience. It’s essential to choose high-quality programs, such as cacrep accredited counseling programs, which assure rigorous, standardized training. Those concerned about tuition costs can explore the cheapest master's in counseling online, making advanced education more accessible.

By exploring these related pathways, you can enhance your expertise and boost your employability in neuroscience and allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn V. Papp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles