World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
28399
World Ranking
2680
National Ranking
116

Erhard Rahm publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erhard Rahm sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 341 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Erhard Rahm D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erhard Rahm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Erhard Rahm is affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany and has an extensive body of research within the field of Computer Science, contributing 78 publications. Their work predominantly spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, as well as Sociology and Political Science.

Their research covers a broad spectrum of topics, focusing mainly on Data Quality and Management, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Topic Modeling, Advanced Graph Neural Networks, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Graph Theory and Algorithms, and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies.

Frequently publishing in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SN Computer Science, Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), and Data & Knowledge Engineering, Rahm's research output includes both journal articles and conference papers.

Recent publications include:

  • Construction of Knowledge Graphs: Current State and Challenges, 2024, Information
  • Distributed temporal graph analytics with GRADOOP, 2021, The VLDB Journal
  • Optimization of the Mainzelliste software for fast privacy-preserving record linkage, 2021, Journal of Translational Medicine
  • Physics-informed deep learning to quantify anomalies for real-time fault mitigation in 3D printing, 2024, Applied Intelligence
  • Construction of Knowledge Graphs: Current State and Challenges, 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, most notably Daniel Obraczka, Victor Christen, Christopher Rost, Martin Franke, and Marvin Hofer, with collaboration counts ranging from 6 to 14 joint works.

Best Publications

  • A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching

    Erhard Rahm;Philip A. Bernstein

  • Data Cleaning: Problems and Current Approaches.

    Erhard Rahm;Hong Hai Do

  • Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching

    S. Melnik;H. Garcia-Molina;E. Rahm

  • Generic Schema Matching with Cupid

    Jayant Madhavan;Philip A. Bernstein;Erhard Rahm

  • COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches

    Hong-Hai Do;Erhard Rahm

  • Schema and ontology matching with COMA

    David Aumueller;Hong-Hai Do;Sabine Massmann;Erhard Rahm

  • Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations

    Hong Hai Do;Sergey Melnik;Erhard Rahm

  • Schema Matching and Mapping

    Zohra Bellahsene;Angela Bonifati;Erhard Rahm

  • Evaluation of entity resolution approaches on real-world match problems

    Hanna Köpcke;Andreas Thor;Erhard Rahm

  • Frameworks for entity matching: A comparison

    Hanna Köpcke;Erhard Rahm

  • Rondo: a programming platform for generic model management

    Sergey Melnik;Erhard Rahm;Philip A. Bernstein

  • AGENT WORK: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation

    Robert Müller;Ulrike Greiner;Erhard Rahm

  • Generic schema matching, ten years later

    Philip A. Bernstein;Jayant Madhavan;Erhard Rahm

  • Comparison of schema matching evaluations

    Hong-Hai Do;Sergey Melnik;Erhard Rahm

  • Matching large schemas: Approaches and evaluation

    Hong-Hai Do;Erhard Rahm

  • A survey of current Link Discovery frameworks

    Markus Nentwig;Michael Hartung;Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo;Erhard Rahm

  • Towards Large-Scale Schema and Ontology Matching

    Erhard Rahm

  • Load Balancing for MapReduce-based Entity Resolution

    Lars Kolb;Andreas Thor;Erhard Rahm

  • Dedoop: efficient deduplication with Hadoop

    Lars Kolb;Andreas Thor;Erhard Rahm

  • On Matching Schemas Automatically

    Erhard Rahm;Philip A. Bernstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Gunter Saake
Gunter Saake Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Philip A. Bernstein
Philip A. Bernstein Microsoft (United States)
Peter Christen
Peter Christen Australian National University
Gerhard Weikum
Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Thomas Seidl
Thomas Seidl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo University of Paderborn
Hector Garcia-Molina
Hector Garcia-Molina Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens the door to diverse online degree options and career paths in related STEM fields. Many students look for the online degree for mechanical engineering to combine computational skills with real-world design and manufacturing expertise.

Those with a passion for discovery often consider the cheapest online physics degree, which merges theory with practical applications for future research roles. Data-driven careers are booming, so it’s common to ask, what is the cheapest data science course in the us?—ideal for aspiring analysts or AI specialists.

Finally, the tech industry highly values electrical engineering skills. Choosing from the best online electrical engineering programs USA expands options in robotics, communications, and beyond.

Exploring these degrees empowers students to tailor their studies to evolving interests and future job markets while maintaining the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Erhard Rahm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles