World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
13185
World Ranking
3110
National Ranking
149

Felix Naumann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Naumann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 293 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Felix Naumann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Naumann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Felix Naumann is affiliated with the Hasso Plattner Institute in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in computer science and decision sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including management science and operations research, artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, information systems, and signal processing.

Their research frequently addresses topics such as:

  • Data Quality and Management
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis

Felix Naumann has published regularly in prominent venues, notably:

  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGMOD Record
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
  • Journal of Data and Information Quality

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Felix Naumann include:

  • "Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges", 2020, Artificial Intelligence and Law
  • "The Effects of Data Quality on Machine Learning Performance on Tabular Data", 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The effects of data quality on machine learning performance on tabular data", 2025, Information Systems
  • "Data dependencies for query optimization: a survey", 2021, The VLDB Journal
  • "Data Preparation", 2020, ACM SIGMOD Record

The scientist has collaborated frequently with co-authors including Thorsten Papenbrock, Markus Bühner, Tobias Bleifuß, Divesh Srivastava, and Hazar Harmouch.

Felix Naumann has also contributed to academic literature through book publications. Notably, they authored a book titled "Statistik" published by Springer Nature in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Data fusion

    Jens Bleiholder;Felix Naumann

  • The Stratosphere platform for big data analytics

    Alexander Alexandrov;Rico Bergmann;Stephan Ewen;Johann-Christoph Freytag

  • An Introduction to Duplicate Detection

    Felix Naumann;Melanie Herschel

  • Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems

    Felix Naumann

  • Profiling relational data: a survey

    Ziawasch Abedjan;Lukasz Golab;Felix Naumann

  • Assessment Methods for Information Quality Criteria

    Felix Naumann;Claudia Rolker

  • Schema matching using duplicates

    A. Bilke;F. Naumann

  • Data fusion: resolving data conflicts for integration

    Xin Luna Dong;Felix Naumann

  • Quality-driven Integration of Heterogenous Information Systems

    Felix Naumann;Ulf Leser;Johann Christoph Freytag

  • Analyzing and predicting viral tweets

    Maximilian Jenders;Gjergji Kasneci;Felix Naumann

  • Data profiling revisited

    Felix Naumann

  • Functional dependency discovery: an experimental evaluation of seven algorithms

    Thorsten Papenbrock;Jens Ehrlich;Jannik Marten;Tommy Neubert

  • DogmatiX tracks down duplicates in XML

    Melanie Weis;Felix Naumann

  • Completeness of integrated information sources

    Felix Naumann;Johann-Christoph Freytag;Ulf Leser

  • Semantic Overlay Clusters within Super-Peer Networks

    Alexander Löser;Felix Naumann;Wolf Siberski;Wolfgang Nejdl

  • Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges

    Philipp Hacker;Ralf Krestel;Stefan Grundmann;Felix Naumann

  • Fusion Cubes: Towards Self-Service Business Intelligence

    Alberto Abelló;Jérôme Darmont;Lorena Etcheverry;Matteo Golfarelli

  • A Hybrid Approach to Functional Dependency Discovery

    Thorsten Papenbrock;Felix Naumann

  • Progressive Duplicate Detection

    Thorsten Papenbrock;Arvid Heise;Felix Naumann

  • Adaptive Windows for Duplicate Detection

    Uwe Draisbach;Felix Naumann;Sascha Szott;Oliver Wonneberg

  • Semantic overlay clusters within super-peer networks

    Alexander Löser;Felix Naumann;Wolf Siberski;Wolfgang Nejdl

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulf Leser
Ulf Leser Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Divesh Srivastava
Divesh Srivastava AT&T (United States)
Xin Luna Dong
Xin Luna Dong Facebook (United States)
Lukasz Golab
Lukasz Golab University of Waterloo
Sanjay Chawla
Sanjay Chawla Qatar Computing Research Institute
Lucian Popa
Lucian Popa IBM (United States)
Volker Markl
Volker Markl Technical University of Berlin
Ioana Manolescu
Ioana Manolescu French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Stefano Spaccapietra
Stefano Spaccapietra École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of related online degrees and career paths. Fields like cybersecurity are rapidly expanding, with online cybersecurity degree programs providing specialized knowledge critical for protecting digital systems across sectors.

For those interested in technology’s role in infrastructure, the best online construction management degree options allow students to combine project management skills with tech expertise, leading to exciting job opportunities in construction and engineering industries.

Understanding the cost of criminal justice degree programs is important for students considering a career safeguarding communities through law, security, or forensic technology. This pathway is increasingly influenced by advancements in computer science.

Additionally, earning an accounting degree online prepares graduates for finance and business roles, whereas familiarity with data analytics and software is highly valued.

These interdisciplinary programs not only broaden career prospects but also make higher education more accessible and affordable through flexible online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Felix Naumann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles