World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6481
World Ranking
10669
National Ranking
423

Lukasz Golab publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukasz Golab sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lukasz Golab D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukasz Golab sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lukasz Golab is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research contributions encompass a variety of subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their scholarly work covers several main topics such as Advanced Database Systems and Queries, Data Management and Algorithms, Data Mining Algorithms and Applications, Data Quality and Management, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Gambling Behavior and Treatments, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).

Lukasz Golab has authored numerous research papers published in recognized venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • FastFabric: Scaling hyperledger fabric to 20 000 transactions per second, 2020, International Journal of Network Management
  • Erratum for Discovering Order Dependencies through Order Compatibility (EDBT 2019), 2020, Movebank
  • Effective Keyword Search Over Weighted Graphs, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • Robust keyword search in large attributed graphs, 2020, Information Retrieval
  • Multi-Modal Discussion Transformer: Integrating Text, Images and Graph Transformers to Detect Hate Speech on Social Media, 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Recurring publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information Systems
  • Energy Informatics
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Movebank

Collaborations form an important aspect of their research endeavors. Frequent co-authors include Jaroslaw Szlichta, Divesh Srivastava, Mehdi Kargar, Parke Godfrey, and Liam Hebert.

Best Publications

  • Issues in data stream management

    Lukasz Golab;M. Tamer Özsu

  • Processing sliding window multi-joins in continuous queries over data streams

    Lukasz Golab;M Tamer Özsu

  • Profiling relational data: a survey

    Ziawasch Abedjan;Lukasz Golab;Felix Naumann

  • FastFabric: Scaling Hyperledger Fabric to 20,000 Transactions per Second

    Christian Gorenflo;Stephen Lee;Lukasz Golab;Srinivasan Keshav

  • Identifying frequent items in sliding windows over on-line packet streams

    Lukasz Golab;David DeHaan;Erik D. Demaine;Alejandro Lopez-Ortiz

  • On generating near-optimal tableaux for conditional functional dependencies

    Lukasz Golab;Howard Karloff;Flip Korn;Divesh Srivastava

  • Sampling the repairs of functional dependency violations under hard constraints

    George Beskales;Ihab F. Ilyas;Lukasz Golab

  • FastFabric: Scaling hyperledger fabric to 20 000 transactions per second

    Christian Gorenflo;Stephen Lee;Lukasz Golab;Srinivasan Keshav

  • Stream warehousing with DataDepot

    Lukasz Golab;Theodore Johnson;J. Spencer Seidel;Vladislav Shkapenyuk

  • Sequential dependencies

    Lukasz Golab;Howard Karloff;Flip Korn;Avishek Saha

  • On the relative trust between inconsistent data and inaccurate constraints

    G. Beskales;I. F. Ilyas;L. Golab;A. Galiullin

  • Sliding window query processing over data streams

    Lukasz Golab

  • Scheduling Updates in a Real-Time Stream Warehouse

    Lukasz Golab;Theodore Johnson;Vladislav Shkapenyuk

  • Interpretable and informative explanations of outcomes

    Kareem El Gebaly;Parag Agrawal;Lukasz Golab;Flip Korn

  • Data Stream Management

    Lukasz Golab;M. Tamer Zsu

  • Update-pattern-aware modeling and processing of continuous queries

    Lukasz Golab;M. Tamer Özsu

  • On indexing sliding windows over online data streams

    Lukasz Golab;Shaveen Garg;M. Tamer Özsu

  • On Indexing Sliding Windows over Online Data Streams

    Lukasz Golab;Shaveen Garg;M. Tamer Özsu

  • Smart Meter Data Analytics: Systems, Algorithms, and Benchmarking

    Xiufeng Liu;Lukasz Golab;Wojciech Golab;Ihab F. Ilyas

  • Large-scale network traffic monitoring with DBStream, a system for rolling big data analysis

    Arian Bar;Alessandro Finamore;Pedro Casas;Lukasz Golab

  • Data Profiling

    Ziawasch Abedjan;Lukasz Golab;Felix Naumann

Frequent Co-Authors

Divesh Srivastava
Divesh Srivastava AT&T (United States)
Srinivasan Keshav
Srinivasan Keshav University of Cambridge
Theodore Johnson
Theodore Johnson AT&T (United States)
Howard Karloff
Howard Karloff Amazon (United States)
Ihab F. Ilyas
Ihab F. Ilyas University of Waterloo
M. Tamer Özsu
M. Tamer Özsu University of Waterloo
Flip Korn
Flip Korn Google (United States)
Pedro Casas
Pedro Casas Austrian Institute of Technology
Felix Naumann
Felix Naumann Hasso Plattner Institute
Oliver Spatscheck
Oliver Spatscheck AT&T (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible study options and career paths. With the rise of remote learning, students can now explore the online computer science degree route, which allows faster completion and scheduling flexibility. These programs cater to learners with different backgrounds and offer a jumpstart into tech-related careers.

Affordability and accessibility are important considerations. Many prospective students look for the cheapest online college options to minimize student debt. Others may have concerns about prior academic performance and are interested in a college with low gpa admission requirements, making higher education more inclusive.

Computer science degrees often overlap with other disciplines. For example, those interested in technology and sustainability can explore possibilities highlighted in "what can you do with an environmental science major," which details careers at the intersection of science, data, and the environment. By choosing the right program, students can tailor their studies to match their long-term goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Lukasz Golab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles