World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 67 2230 2163 1113 1072 592 14899

Elke A. Rundensteiner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elke A. Rundensteiner between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elke A. Rundensteiner published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 18.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2022. 36 of the 687 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2022. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 24 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 23 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 10 publications
1988 2025

687 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elke A. Rundensteiner: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 7
1990 4
1991 4
1992 6
1993 6
1994 7
1995 12
1996 20
1997 18
1998 24
1999 21
2000 23
2001 19
2002 23
2003 29
2004 21
2005 21
2006 26
2007 22
2008 17
2009 24
2010 24
2011 21
2012 5
2013 17
2014 18
2015 8
2016 13
2017 18
2018 21
2019 28
2020 33
2021 27
2022 36
2023 26
2024 26
2025 10
Total 687
Download as CSV

Elke A. Rundensteiner publications per year - data summary

  • Elke A. Rundensteiner, a Computer Science scholar from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, has 687 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 36 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1988, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 18.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 18.1 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 125 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 154 publications (11.8 per year); 2001-2013: 269 publications (20.7 per year); 2014-2025: 264 publications (22.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Elke A. Rundensteiner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elke A. Rundensteiner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 592–601 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 592 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41 592
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Elke A. Rundensteiner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Elke A. Rundensteiner, a Computer Science scholar from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, records 592 publications - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Elke A. Rundensteiner, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Elke A. Rundensteiner ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Elke A. Rundensteiner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elke A. Rundensteiner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249 67
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Elke A. Rundensteiner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Elke A. Rundensteiner, a Computer Science scholar from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, records 67 D-Index - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Elke A. Rundensteiner, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Elke A. Rundensteiner ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Elke A. Rundensteiner is affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within computer science and psychology, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and mental health applications.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these areas, their research delves into specialized subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Applied Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The primary research topics covered include:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Data Management and Algorithms

Frequent co-authors in their body of work are:

  • Walter Gerych
  • Emmanuel Agu
  • Luke Buquicchio
  • ML Tlachac
  • Kavin Chandrasekaran

The scientist has published extensively, with recurring appearances in key venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
  • 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Some of their recent notable papers are:

  • Applying Machine Learning Approaches to Suicide Prediction Using Healthcare Data: Overview and Future Directions, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Moodable: On feasibility of instantaneous depression assessment using machine learning on voice samples with retrospectively harvested smartphone and social media data, 2020, Smart Health
  • Screening For Depression With Retrospectively Harvested Private Versus Public Text, 2020, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Rank aggregation algorithms for fair consensus, 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Ensembles of BERT for Depression Classification, 2022, 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)

Best Publications

  • Hierarchical parallel coordinates for exploration of large datasets

    Ying-Huey Fua;Matthew O. Ward;Elke A. Rundensteiner

  • Clutter Reduction in Multi-Dimensional Data Visualization Using Dimension Reordering

    W. Peng;M.O. Ward;E.A. Rundensteiner

  • Multiview: A Methodology for Supporting Multiple Views in Object-Oriented Databases

    Elke A. Rundensteiner

  • Hierarchical encoded path views for path query processing: an optimal model and its performance evaluation

    N. Jing;Y.-W. Huang;E.A. Rundensteiner

  • Spatial Joins Using R-trees: Breadth-First Traversal with Global Optimizations

    Yun-Wu Huang;Ning Jing;Elke A. Rundensteiner

  • Interactive hierarchical dimension ordering, spacing and filtering for exploration of high dimensional datasets

    Jing Wang;Wei Peng;M.O. Ward;E.A. Rundensteiner

  • System and method for synchronizing and/or updating an existing relational database with supplemental XML data

    Wang-Chien Lee;Gail Anne Mitchell;Elke Angelika Rundensteiner;Xin Zhang

  • Maintaining data warehouses over changing information sources

    Elke A. Rundensteiner;Andreas Koeller;Xin Zhang

  • Runtime Semantic Query Optimization for Event Stream Processing

    Luping Ding;Songting Chen;E.A. Rundensteiner;J. Tatemura

  • InterRing: an interactive tool for visually navigating and manipulating hierarchical structures

    Jing Yang;M.O. Ward;E.A. Rundensteiner

  • Dynamic plan migration for continuous queries over data streams

    Yali Zhu;Elke A. Rundensteiner;George T. Heineman

  • Visual hierarchical dimension reduction for exploration of high dimensional datasets

    J. Yang;M. O. Ward;E. A. Rundensteiner;S. Huang

  • Automatic emotion detection in text streams by analyzing Twitter data

    Maryam Hasan;Elke A. Rundensteiner;Emmanuel Agu

  • Method and system of document transformation between a source extensible markup language (XML) schema and a target XML schema

    Hong Su;Harumi Anne Kuno;Elke Angelika Rundensteiner

  • Toward inquiry-based education through interacting software agents

    D.E. Atkins;W.P. Birmingham;E.H. Durfee;E.J. Glover

  • Automating the transformation of XML documents

    Hong Su;Harumi Kuno;Elke A. Rundensteiner

  • Method and system of valuing transformation between extensible markup language (XML) documents

    Hong Su;Harumi Anne Kuno;Elke Angelika Rundensteiner;Umeshwar Dayal

  • Mapping nominal values to numbers for effective visualization

    Geraldine E. Rosario;Elke A. Rundensteiner;David C. Brown;Matthew O. Ward

  • Neighbor-based pattern detection for windows over streaming data

    Di Yang;Elke A. Rundensteiner;Matthew O. Ward

  • Scalable distance-based outlier detection over high-volume data streams

    Lei Cao;Di Yang;Qingyang Wang;Yanwei Yu

  • A transparent schema-evolution system based on object-oriented view technology

    Young-Gook Ra;E.A. Rundensteiner

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew O. Ward
Matthew O. Ward University of Southern Mississippi
Xiangnan Kong
Xiangnan Kong Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette
Kang G. Shin
Kang G. Shin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Yanchun Zhang
Yanchun Zhang Victoria University
Karl Aberer
Karl Aberer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Wang-Chien Lee
Wang-Chien Lee Pennsylvania State University
David Maier
David Maier Portland State University
Edmund H. Durfee
Edmund H. Durfee University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a smart way to access new opportunities in Computer Science. For those seeking quick advancement, consider shortest masters degree options. These programs can accelerate your career growth without a lengthy time commitment.

If you're evaluating long-term value, it's important to focus on graduate degrees that are worth it. High-demand master’s degrees can lead to in-demand careers in tech, data, or IT management, offering strong job security and lucrative salaries.

Students just starting out may benefit from associates degrees online. These two-year programs provide foundational knowledge and a pathway to entry-level roles, or an affordable start before transferring to a four-year degree.

Cost is always a concern when pursuing higher education. Thankfully, there are many cheapest online degrees available, helping students minimize debt and get maximum value for their investment.

With flexible online options at every level, there’s a clear path to advancing or jump-starting a career in Computer Science, regardless of your starting point.

Best Scientists Citing Elke A. Rundensteiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles