World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Norway
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
11498
World Ranking
3127
National Ranking
4

Helwig Hauser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helwig Hauser sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Helwig Hauser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helwig Hauser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Norway Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Norway Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Norway Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Norway Leader Award

Overview

Helwig Hauser is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research is primarily focused on data visualization and analytics, with significant work in related areas such as computer graphics and visualization techniques, video analysis, and summarization.

The scientist's research spans several subfields within computer science, including:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Signal Processing
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent topics covered in their work comprise:

  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Optimal Experimental Design Methods

Helwig Hauser has published multiple papers in prominent scientific venues. Some recent papers include:

  • "Sketch-Based Fast and Accurate Querying of Time Series Using Parameter-Sharing LSTM Networks", 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "DimLift: Interactive Hierarchical Data Exploration Through Dimensional Bundling", 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Interactive Design-of-Experiments: Optimizing a Cooling System", 2024, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Visual Exploration of Large Normal Mode Spaces to Study Protein Flexibility", 2020, Computers & Graphics
  • "Integrated Dual Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative High-Dimensional Data", 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

The scientist often collaborates with a consistent group of co-authors, including Krešimir Matković (eight joint publications), Rainer Splechtna (six joint publications), Denis Gračanin (six joint publications), Laura Garrison (three joint publications), and Stefan Brückner (three joint publications).

Their preferred publication venues reflect their focus on visualization and computer graphics, with numerous contributions to:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • Computers & Graphics
  • Transport in Porous Media

The research associated with Helwig Hauser incorporates methodologies and techniques from diverse areas such as multi-objective optimization, experimental design, and immersive display technologies, underlining an interdisciplinary approach to computer science challenges.

Best Publications

  • The State of the Art in Flow Visualisation: Feature Extraction and Tracking

    Frits H. Post;Benjamin Vrolijk;Helwig Hauser;Robert S. Laramee

  • The State of the Art in Flow Visualization : Dense and Texture-Based Techniques

    Robert S. Laramee;Helwig Hauser;Helmut Doleisch;Benjamin Vrolijk

  • Visualization and Visual Analysis of Multifaceted Scientific Data: A Survey

    J. Kehrer;H. Hauser

  • Glyph-based Visualization: Foundations, Design Guidelines, Techniques and Applications

    Rita Borgo;Johannes Kehrer;David H. S. Chung;Eamonn Maguire

  • Parallel Sets: interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data

    R. Kosara;F. Bendix;H. Hauser

  • Angular brushing of extended parallel coordinates

    H. Hauser;F. Ledermann;H. Doleisch

  • Interactive feature specification for focus+context visualization of complex simulation data

    Helmut Doleisch;Martin Gasser;Helwig Hauser

  • Outlier-Preserving Focus+Context Visualization in Parallel Coordinates

    M. Novotny;H. Hauser

  • High-quality two-level volume rendering of segmented data sets on consumer graphics hardware

    M. Hadwiger;C. Berger;H. Hauser

  • Two-level volume rendering

    H. Hauser;L. Mroz;G. Italo Bischi;M.E. Groller

  • Topology-Based Flow Visualization, The State of the Art

    Robert S. Laramee;Helwig Hauser;Lingxiao Zhao;Frits H. Post

  • Feature Extraction and Visualisation of Flow Fields

    Frits H. Post;Benjamin Vrolijk;Helwig Hauser;Robert S. Laramee

  • Scientific Storytelling Using Visualization

    Kwan-Liu Ma;I. Liao;J. Frazier;H. Hauser

  • Semantic depth of field

    R. Kosara;S. Miksch;H. Hauser

  • Visualization of Multi‐Variate Scientific Data

    Raphael Fuchs;Helwig Hauser

  • Image space based visualization of unsteady flow on surfaces

    R.S. Laramee;B. Jobard;H. Hauser

  • Focus+context taken literally

    R. Kosara;S. Miksch;H. Hauser

  • Parallel sets: visual analysis of categorical data

    F. Bendix;R. Kosara;H. Hauser

  • Interactive visualization of streaming data with Kernel Density Estimation

    Ove Daae Lampe;Helwig Hauser

  • Generalizing Focus+Context Visualization

    Helwig Hauser

  • Fast Visualization of Object Contours by Non-Photorealistic Volume Rendering

    Balázs Csébfalvi;Lukas Mroz;Helwig Hauser;Andreas König

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Viola
Ivan Viola King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Robert S. Laramee
Robert S. Laramee University of Nottingham
Markus Hadwiger
Markus Hadwiger King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Stefan Bruckner
Stefan Bruckner University of Rostock
Bernhard Preim
Bernhard Preim Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Holger Theisel
Holger Theisel Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Hans-Christian Hege
Hans-Christian Hege Zuse Institute Berlin
Hans-Peter Seidel
Hans-Peter Seidel Max Planck Institute for Informatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Computer Science offers flexibility and a wide range of pathways to careers in tech. For those just starting, associates degrees online present an accessible entry point, often focusing on foundational skills and faster completion times.

If you’re concerned about cost, there are many cheap online colleges that deliver quality computer science programs at affordable tuition rates. These options can help you minimize student debt while maximizing your educational investment.

For students with a less competitive academic record, finding a college that accepts low gpa may be crucial. Many online institutions offer flexible admissions processes, ensuring more students have access to tech careers.

Interested in advancing your expertise? Many professionals pursue graduate degrees that are worth it, such as a master’s in computer science or related fields, to qualify for higher-level roles and increase earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Helwig Hauser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles