World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Eduard Gröller

M. Eduard Gröller

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
4720
World Ranking
12669
National Ranking
112

M. Eduard Gröller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Eduard Gröller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

M. Eduard Gröller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Eduard Gröller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Eduard Gröller is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research has primarily focused on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's main research topics include Data Visualization and Analytics, Video Analysis and Summarization, Multimedia Communication and Technology, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Human Pose and Action Recognition, Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications, and Web Data Mining and Analysis.

Recent publications demonstrate a strong presence in both theoretical and applied aspects of visualization and biomedical data analysis. Selected papers include:

  • "Molecumentary: Adaptable Narrated Documentaries Using Molecular Visualization" (2021), IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "HyperLabels: Browsing of Dense and Hierarchical Molecular 3D Models" (2020), IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Context-responsive labeling in augmented reality" (2021), reposiTUm (TU Wien)
  • "Semi-automatic vessel detection for challenging cases of peripheral arterial disease" (2021), Computers in Biology and Medicine
  • "VAPOR: Visual Analytics for the Exploration of Pelvic Organ Variability in Radiotherapy" (2020), Computers & Graphics

The scientist frequently publishes in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Computers & Graphics
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine

Collaborations are significant in their career, with frequent coauthors including Renata G. Raidou, Katarína Furmanová, Barbora Kozlíková, Thomas Höllt, and Bernhard Preim.

M. Eduard Gröller also has a book publication titled BioMedical Visualization (2024) published by Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Best Publications

  • VolumeShop: an interactive system for direct volume illustration

    S. Bruckner;M.E. Groller

  • Importance-Driven Volume Rendering

    Unknown

  • Two-level volume rendering

    H. Hauser;L. Mroz;G. Italo Bischi;M.E. Groller

  • Importance-driven feature enhancement in volume visualization

    Unknown

  • Style Transfer Functions for Illustrative Volume Rendering

    S. Bruckner;M. E. Gröller

  • Exploded Views for Volume Data

    S. Bruckner;M.E. Groller

  • Fast Visualization of Object Contours by Non-Photorealistic Volume Rendering

    Balázs Csébfalvi;Lukas Mroz;Helwig Hauser;Andreas König

  • Illustrative Context-Preserving Exploration of Volume Data

    S. Bruckner;S. Grimm;A. Kanitsar;M.E. Groller

  • State of the Art in Transfer Functions for Direct Volume Rendering

    Patric Ljung;Jens Krüger;Eduard Groller;Markus Hadwiger

  • Strategies for interactive exploration of 3D flow using evenly-spaced illuminated streamlines

    Oliver Mattausch;Thomas Theußl;Helwig Hauser;Eduard Gröller

  • Optimal regular volume sampling

    T. Theussl;T. Moller;M.E. Groller

  • Illustrative context-preserving volume rendering

    Stefan Bruckner;Sören Grimm;Armin Kanitsar;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Instant volume visualization using maximum intensity difference accumulation

    Stefan Bruckner;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Hardware-based nonlinear filtering and segmentation using high-level shading languages

    Unknown

  • Semantic Layers for Illustrative Volume Rendering

    P. Rautek;S. Bruckner;M. Eduard Groller

  • Gradient Estimation in Volume Data using 4D Linear Regression

    László Neumann;Balázs Csébfalvi;Andreas König;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Nonlinear ray tracing: visualizing strange worlds

    M. Eduard Gröller

  • Advanced curved planar reformation: flattening of vascular structures

    Unknown

  • Interactive High-Quality Maximum Intensity Projection

    Lukas Mroz;Helwig Hauser;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Feature emphasis and contextual cutaways for multimodal medical visualization

    Michael Burns;Martin Haidacher;Wolfgang Wein;Ivan Viola

  • Exploration of 4D MRI Blood Flow using Stylistic Visualization

    Roy van Pelt;Javier Oliván Bescós;Marcel Breeuwer;Rachel E Clough

  • BrainGazer - Visual Queries for Neurobiology Research

    S. Bruckner;V. Solteszova;M.E. Groller;J. Hladuvka

  • VolumeShop: An Interactive System for Direct Volume Illustration

    Unknown

  • Two-level volume rendering — fusing MIP and DVR

    Helwig Hauser;Lukas Mroz;Gian-Italo Bischi;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Volume visualization based on statistical transfer-function spaces

    Martin Haidacher;Daniel Patel;Stefan Bruckner;Armin Kanitsar

  • Flexible Direct Multi-Volume Rendering in Dynamic Scenes.

    Sören Grimm;Stefan Bruckner;Armin Kanitsar;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Process visualization with levels of detail

    K. Matkovic;H. Hauser;R. Sainitzer;M.E. Groller

  • Information-based transfer functions for multimodal visualization

    Martin Haidacher;Stefan Bruckner;Armin Kanitsar;M. Eduard Gröller

  • Mastering windows: improving reconstruction

    Helwig Hauser;Eduard Groller;Thomas Theussl

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Bruckner
Stefan Bruckner University of Rostock
Ivan Viola
Ivan Viola King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Tobias Isenberg
Tobias Isenberg French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Torsten Möller
Torsten Möller University of Vienna
Helwig Hauser
Helwig Hauser University of Bergen
David S. Goodsell
David S. Goodsell Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Markus Hadwiger
Markus Hadwiger King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Arthur J. Olson
Arthur J. Olson Scripps Research Institute
Bernhard Preim
Bernhard Preim Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Anna Vilanova
Anna Vilanova Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science in the USA is closely linked with many other technology disciplines, offering students a wide range of career pathways and online degree options. For those interested in data analytics, there are data science programs designed to equip you with in-demand skills at affordable rates.

Engineering enthusiasts may also want to explore an electrical engineering degree online admissions process, which allows for flexible learning while preparing for dynamic roles in robotics, power systems, and more.

If your goal is a quicker route to a high-earning position, consider 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These offer fast-track credentials in areas such as IT support or cybersecurity.

For those aiming to advance their careers rapidly, the shortest master degree programs make it possible to earn a master’s online in just a year, opening doors to senior roles in tech companies.

Exploring these related degrees and credentials can help you tailor your education to your career goals, often with flexible and affordable options.

Best Scientists Citing M. Eduard Gröller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles