World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Schrooten

Jan Schrooten

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 53 9147 8832 109 107 243 11636
Engineering and Technology 55 2972 2843 37 37 250 12208

Jan Schrooten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Schrooten between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Schrooten published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2014. 3 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2014. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Schrooten: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 4
2000 7
2001 5
2002 9
2003 5
2004 8
2005 9
2006 6
2007 5
2008 12
2009 13
2010 22
2011 26
2012 32
2013 33
2014 34
2015 24
2016 8
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 273
Download as CSV

Jan Schrooten publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Schrooten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 250 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 250
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Schrooten D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Schrooten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186 55
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Schrooten is affiliated with Antleron in Belgium and has contributed to multiple research fields primarily within engineering. Their focus includes biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, automotive engineering, molecular biology, and materials chemistry.

Their scholarly work covers a range of topics such as viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects, bone tissue engineering materials, additive manufacturing materials and processes, titanium alloys microstructure and properties, extraction and separation processes, advancements in battery materials, and advanced battery technologies research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jan Schrooten include Maarten Sonnaert, Evan Claes, Tommy Heck, Jan Verwaeren, and Filip Donvil.

Their publications have appeared mainly in the venues:

  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering
  • Acta Biomaterialia
  • Chemical Reviews

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of dense and porous Zn produced by laser powder bed fusion for biodegradable implant applications," 2020, Acta Biomaterialia
  • "From Mining to Manufacturing: Scientific Challenges and Opportunities behind Battery Production," 2025, Chemical Reviews
  • "Bayesian cell therapy process optimization," 2024, Biotechnology and Bioengineering
  • "Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Volume 121, Number 5, May 2024," 2024, Biotechnology and Bioengineering
  • "Digital Model-Driven Cell & Gene Therapy Process Development," 2025, Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Best Publications

  • The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds

    S. Van Bael;Y. C. Chai;Y. C. Chai;S. Truscello;M. Moesen

  • Effects of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V lattice structures

    Ruben Wauthle;Bey Vrancken;Britt Beynaerts;Karl Jorissen

  • Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures

    S. Van Bael;Greet Kerckhofs;M. Moesen;G. Pyka

  • A calcium-induced signaling cascade leading to osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells.

    Ana M.C. Barradas;Hugo A.M. Fernandes;Nathalie Groen;Yoke Chin Chai

  • Additively manufactured porous tantalum implants

    Ruben Wauthle;Johan Van Der Stok;Saber Amin Yavari;Jan Van Humbeeck

  • Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells

    S.M. Ahmadi;G. Campoli;S. Amin Yavari;B. Sajadi

  • Relationship between unit cell type and porosity and the fatigue behavior of selective laser melted meta-biomaterials

    S. Amin Yavari;S.M. Ahmadi;R. Wauthle;B. Pouran

  • Additively Manufactured Open-Cell Porous Biomaterials Made from Six Different Space-Filling Unit Cells: The Mechanical and Morphological Properties

    Seyed Mohammad Ahmadi;Saber Amin Yavari;Saber Amin Yavari;Ruebn Wauthle;Behdad Pouran;Behdad Pouran

  • Fatigue behavior of porous biomaterials manufactured using selective laser melting.

    S. Amin Yavari;R. Wauthle;J. van der Stok;A.C. Riemslag

  • Current views on calcium phosphate osteogenicity and the translation into effective bone regeneration strategies

    Y. C. Chai;Aurélie Carlier;J. Bolander;S. J. Roberts

  • Surface modification of Ti6Al4V open porous structures produced by additive manufacturing

    Grzegorz Pyka;Andrzej Burakowski;Greet Kerckhofs;Maarten Moesen

  • Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium.

    Saber Amin Yavari;Johan van der Stok;Yoke Chin Chai;Ruben Wauthle

  • Articular cartilage and biomechanical properties of the long bones in Frzb-knockout mice.

    Rik J. U. Lories;Jenny Peeters;Astrid Bakker;Przemko Tylzanowski

  • Surface Roughness and Morphology Customization of Additive Manufactured Open Porous Ti6Al4V Structures.

    Grzegorz Pyka;Greet Kerckhofs;Greet Kerckhofs;Ioannis Papantoniou;Mathew Speirs

  • Effect of SLM Parameters on Transformation Temperatures of Shape Memory Nickel Titanium Parts

    Sasan Dadbakhsh;Mathew Speirs;Jean-Pierre Kruth;Jan Schrooten

  • Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study.

    S. Truscello;Greet Kerckhofs;S. Van Bael;G. Pyka

  • Revival of pure titanium for dynamically loaded porous implants using additive manufacturing

    Ruben Wauthle;Seyed Mohammad Ahmadi;Saber Amin Yavari;Michiel Mulier

  • Adhesion of bioactive glass coating to Ti6Al4V oral implant

    Jan Schrooten;Jozef Helsen

  • Staphylococcal biofilm growth on smooth and porous titanium coatings for biomedical applications

    Annabel Braem;Lieve Van Mellaert;Tina Mattheys;Dorien Hofmans

  • Impact damage behaviour of shape memory alloy composites

    Kelly A Tsoi;Rudy Stalmans;Jan Schrooten;Martine Wevers

  • Probing the Osteoinductive Effect of Calcium Phosphate by Using an In Vitro Biomimetic Model

    Yoke Chin Chai;Scott J. Roberts;Jan Schrooten;Frank P. Luyten

Frequent Co-Authors

Liesbet Geris
Liesbet Geris University of Liège
Frank Luyten
Frank Luyten KU Leuven
Harrie Weinans
Harrie Weinans Utrecht University
Jef Vleugels
Jef Vleugels KU Leuven
Amir A. Zadpoor
Amir A. Zadpoor Delft University of Technology
Peter Dubruel
Peter Dubruel Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology can open various pathways in both technical and administrative roles. Many students consider supplementing their core education with online programs that build complementary skills for a well-rounded career.

For example, gaining financial skills can be invaluable for engineering project management, making best online bookkeeping certificate programs a strategic choice. Administrative skills also play a key role; an associate degree in office management online can enhance efficiency in technical offices or labs.

Business knowledge is crucial for advancing into leadership or entrepreneurial roles within technology sectors. Completing online business degree programs accredited ensures you learn core business and management concepts.

For those aiming to lead teams or departments, pursuing one of the best online master's in organizational leadership can provide advanced leadership strategies relevant to tech-related organizations. Combining technology expertise with business, administrative, and leadership training can give you an edge in today’s competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Schrooten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles