World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
37756
World Ranking
9583
National Ranking
4935

Joel D. Kaufman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel D. Kaufman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joel D. Kaufman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel D. Kaufman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2009 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Joel D. Kaufman is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. Additional subfields of their work include speech and hearing, environmental engineering, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and pollution.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Kaufman has published extensively in several venues, with the most frequent being:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • UNC Libraries
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Environmental Research

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Association of Dysanapsis With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Older Adults, 2020, JAMA
  • WHO Air Quality Guidelines 2021 - Aiming for Healthier Air for all: A Joint Statement by Medical, Public Health, Scientific Societies and Patient Representative Organisations, 2021, International Journal of Public Health
  • Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution, APOE-ε4 status, and cognitive decline in a cohort of older adults in northern Manhattan, 2020, Environment International
  • Cardiopulmonary Impact of Particulate Air Pollution in High-Risk Populations, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Comparison of Particulate Air Pollution From Different Emission Sources and Incident Dementia in the US, 2023, JAMA Internal Medicine

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues including Adam A. Szpiro, Eric A. Whitsel, Mark A. Espeland, Anjum Hajat, and Gregory A. Wellenius.

Kaufman has been recognized with several awards such as:

  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 2020
  • ACM Distinguished Member, 2009

Best Publications

  • Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease An Update to the Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Robert D. Brook;Sanjay Rajagopalan;C. Arden Pope;Jeffrey R. Brook

  • Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Women

    Kristin A. Miller;David S. Siscovick;Lianne Sheppard;Kristen Shepherd

  • Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review.

    Gerard Hoek;Ranjini M Krishnan;Rob Beelen;Annette Peters

  • Association between air pollution and coronary artery calcification within six metropolitan areas in the USA (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution): a longitudinal cohort study

    Joel D Kaufman;Sara D Adar;R Graham Barr;Matthew Budoff

  • The Outdoor Air Pollution and Brain Health Workshop

    Michelle L. Block;Alison Elder;Richard L. Auten;Staci D. Bilbo

  • Referent selection in case-crossover analyses of acute health effects of air pollution.

    Drew Levy;Thomas Lumley;Lianne Sheppard;Joel Kaufman

  • Environmental factors in cardiovascular disease

    Kristen E. Cosselman;Ana Navas-Acien;Joel D. Kaufman

  • Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors.

    Peregrin Spielholz;Barbara Silverstein;Michael Morgan;Harvey Checkoway

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between {beta}2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms and asthma: a HuGE review.

    Ammarin Thakkinstian;Mark McEvoy;Cosetta Minelli;Peter Gibson

  • Associations between Recent Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Blood Pressure in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Amy H. Auchincloss;Ana V. Diez Roux;Timothy Dvonch;Patrick L. Brown

  • Association Between Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Change in Quantitatively Assessed Emphysema and Lung Function

    Meng Wang;Meng Wang;Carrie Pistenmaa Aaron;Jaime Madrigano;Jaime Madrigano;Eric A Hoffman

  • Effect of ambient air pollution on pulmonary exacerbations and lung function in cystic fibrosis.

    Christopher H. Goss;Stacey A. Newsom;Jonathan S. Schildcrout;Lianne Sheppard

  • Comparison of coronary artery calcium presence, carotid plaque presence, and carotid intima-media thickness for cardiovascular disease prediction in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

    Adam D. Gepner;Rebekah Young;Joseph A. Delaney;Matthew C. Tattersall

  • Air Pollution and Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status: Evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Anjum Hajat;Ana V. Diez-Roux;Sara D. Adar;Amy H. Auchincloss

  • Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution and Markers of Inflammation, Coagulation, and Endothelial Activation: A Repeat-measures Analysis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Anjum Hajat;Matthew Allison;Ana V. Diez-Roux;Nancy Swords Jenny

  • Endocrine Aspects of Male Sexual Dysfunctions

    Jacques Buvat;Mario Maggi;Louis Gooren;Andre A.T. Guay

  • Semen quality of men employed at a lead smelter

    B H Alexander;H Checkoway;C van Netten;C H Muller

  • Diesel Exhaust Inhalation Elicits Acute Vasoconstriction in Vivo

    Alon Peretz;Jeffrey H. Sullivan;Daniel F. Leotta;Carol A. Trenga

  • Fine particulate air pollution and the progression of carotid intima-medial thickness: a prospective cohort study from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis and air pollution.

    Sara D. Adar;Lianne Sheppard;Sverre Vedal;Joseph F. Polak

  • A regionalized national universal kriging model using Partial Least Squares regression for estimating annual PM2.5 concentrations in epidemiology.

    Paul D. Sampson;Mark Richards;Adam A. Szpiro;Silas Bergen

Frequent Co-Authors

Lianne Sheppard
Lianne Sheppard University of Washington
Adam A. Szpiro
Adam A. Szpiro University of Washington
R. Graham Barr
R. Graham Barr Columbia University
Timothy V. Larson
Timothy V. Larson University of Washington
Sverre Vedal
Sverre Vedal University of Washington
Ana V. Diez Roux
Ana V. Diez Roux Drexel University
James H. Stein
James H. Stein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eric A. Hoffman
Eric A. Hoffman University of Iowa
David R. Jacobs
David R. Jacobs University of Minnesota
Wendy S. Post
Wendy S. Post Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Medicine in the USA offers a wide range of rewarding career pathways beyond the traditional MD route. Online degrees are increasingly popular, providing flexibility and access to specialized programs while catering to diverse interests and schedules.

For those interested in nutrition and public health, the best online food science degree programs can open doors to careers in dietetics, research, or food industry innovation. If you're considering a leadership role in healthcare systems, cahme accredited mha online programs ensure high educational standards for aspiring healthcare administrators.

Nursing professionals looking to advance without extensive on-site requirements can explore best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. For Nurses aiming for the highest level of practice, the shortest dnp programs offer an accelerated route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

These online pathways make it easier to upskill and specialize, offering both convenience and credibility—whether you’re embarking on a new medical journey or advancing within your current healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Joel D. Kaufman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles