World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 53 4276 4094 1603 1480 307 9712

Adam A. Szpiro publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam A. Szpiro between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam A. Szpiro published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 63 publications in 2024. 30 of the 391 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 63. Peak 63 publications in 2024. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 45 publications 2024: 63 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

391 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam A. Szpiro: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 2
2010 6
2011 17
2012 8
2013 10
2014 21
2015 10
2016 20
2017 9
2018 16
2019 22
2020 30
2021 31
2022 38
2023 45
2024 63
2025 29
2026 1
Total 391
Download as CSV

Adam A. Szpiro publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam A. Szpiro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 307 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130 307
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam A. Szpiro D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam A. Szpiro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217 53
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Association between air pollution and coronary artery calcification within six metropolitan areas in the USA (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution): a longitudinal cohort study

    Joel D Kaufman;Sara D Adar;R Graham Barr;Matthew Budoff

  • Association Between Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Change in Quantitatively Assessed Emphysema and Lung Function

    Meng Wang;Meng Wang;Carrie Pistenmaa Aaron;Jaime Madrigano;Jaime Madrigano;Eric A Hoffman

  • Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution and Markers of Inflammation, Coagulation, and Endothelial Activation: A Repeat-measures Analysis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Anjum Hajat;Matthew Allison;Ana V. Diez-Roux;Nancy Swords Jenny

  • Confounding and exposure measurement error in air pollution epidemiology

    Lianne Sheppard;Richard T. Burnett;Adam A. Szpiro;Sun Young Kim

  • A regionalized national universal kriging model using Partial Least Squares regression for estimating annual PM2.5 concentrations in epidemiology.

    Paul D. Sampson;Mark Richards;Adam A. Szpiro;Silas Bergen

  • A Unified Spatiotemporal Modeling Approach for Predicting Concentrations of Multiple Air Pollutants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution

    Joshua P. Keller;Casey Olives;Sun Young Kim;Lianne Sheppard

  • Vascular Responses to Long- and Short-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter: MESA Air (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution)

    Ranjini M. Krishnan;Sara D. Adar;Sara D. Adar;Adam A. Szpiro;Neal W. Jorgensen

  • Prospective Study of Particulate Air Pollution Exposures, Subclinical Atherosclerosis, and Clinical Cardiovascular Disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air)

    Joel D. Kaufman;Sara D. Adar;Ryan W. Allen;R. Graham Barr

  • Long-Term Air Pollution Exposure and Blood Pressure in the Sister Study.

    Stephanie H. Chan;Victor C. Van Hee;Silas Bergen;Adam A. Szpiro

  • Mapping Air Pollution with Google Street View Cars: Efficient Approaches with Mobile Monitoring and Land Use Regression

    Kyle P. Messier;Kyle P. Messier;Sarah E. Chambliss;Shahzad Gani;Ramon Alvarez

  • Satellite-Based NO2 and Model Validation in a National Prediction Model Based on Universal Kriging and Land-Use Regression.

    Michael T. Young;Matthew J. Bechle;Paul D. Sampson;Adam A. Szpiro

  • Predicting intra‐urban variation in air pollution concentrations with complex spatio‐temporal dependencies

    Adam A. Szpiro;Paul D. Sampson;Lianne Sheppard;Thomas Lumley

  • Efficient measurement error correction with spatially misaligned data

    Adam A. Szpiro;Lianne Sheppard;Thomas Lumley

  • Comparing universal kriging and land-use regression for predicting concentrations of gaseous oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air).

    Laina D. Mercer;Adam A. Szpiro;Lianne Sheppard;Johan Lindström;Johan Lindström

  • Exposure to traffic and left ventricular mass and function: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

    Victor C. Van Hee;Sara D. Adar;Adam A. Szpiro;R. Graham Barr

  • Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: a pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies.

    Marianthi Anna Kioumourtzoglou;Donna Spiegelman;Adam A. Szpiro;Lianne Sheppard

  • Air Pollution and the microvasculature: a cross-sectional assessment of in vivo retinal images in the population-based multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

    Sara D. Adar;Sara D. Adar;Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Adam A. Szpiro

  • Measurement error in two-stage analyses, with application to air pollution epidemiology.

    Adam A. Szpiro;Christopher J. Paciorek

  • National PM2.5 and NO2 exposure models for China based on land use regression, satellite measurements, and universal kriging.

    Hao Xu;Matthew J. Bechle;Meng Wang;Adam A. Szpiro

  • Pragmatic Estimation of a Spatio-Temporal Air Quality Model With Irregular Monitoring Data

    Paul D. Sampson;Adam A. Szpiro;Lianne Sheppard;Johan Lindström

  • Concentrations of criteria pollutants in the contiguous U.S., 1979 - 2015: Role of prediction model parsimony in integrated empirical geographic regression.

    Sun-Young Kim;Matthew Bechle;Steve Hankey;Lianne Sheppard

  • Does More Accurate Exposure Prediction Necessarily Improve Health Effect Estimates

    Adam A. Szpiro;Christopher J. Paciorek;Lianne Sheppard

  • A flexible spatio-temporal model for air pollution with spatial and spatio-temporal covariates

    Johan Lindström;Adam A. Szpiro;Paul D. Sampson;Assaf P. Oron

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel D. Kaufman
Joel D. Kaufman University of Washington
Lianne Sheppard
Lianne Sheppard University of Washington
Timothy V. Larson
Timothy V. Larson University of Washington
Sverre Vedal
Sverre Vedal University of Washington
Julian D. Marshall
Julian D. Marshall University of Washington
Frances A. Tylavsky
Frances A. Tylavsky University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Meng Wang
Meng Wang University at Buffalo, State University of New York
R. Graham Barr
R. Graham Barr Columbia University
Ana V. Diez Roux
Ana V. Diez Roux Drexel University
Martha L. Daviglus
Martha L. Daviglus University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider related fields that offer diverse career opportunities. For those seeking a manageable academic journey, programs listed under easy bachelor's degree can provide a solid foundation without overwhelming coursework. This is especially helpful for students balancing work or other commitments.

Geology is a natural complement to Environmental Sciences, with many quality options available if you prefer flexibility. The geology degree online programs combine comprehensive study with convenience, making them attractive for those wanting in-depth knowledge of Earth processes.

Another valuable skill set comes from Geographic Information Systems (GIS), vital for mapping and spatial data analysis in environmental work. To specialize in this area, consider the best gis schools that offer robust online curricula tailored to today’s tech-focused environmental strategies.

For graduates eager to influence environmental policy or public administration, pursuing an online master’s degree might be the next step. Programs noted as easiest online mpa programs can help advance leadership skills with a manageable time commitment, opening doors to impactful governmental and nonprofit roles.

Best Scientists Citing Adam A. Szpiro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles