World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Richard Rende publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Rende sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard Rende D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Rende sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Rende is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and focuses their research within the field of social sciences, particularly in education and statistics and probability.

Their work centers on topics such as early childhood education and development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, and child development in relation to digital technology.

Rende has authored publications in notable venues including The Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter and Brain and Behavior. Two of their recent papers are:

  • Chores: Why they still matter and how to engage youth, 2021, The Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter
  • Issue Information, 2020, Brain and Behavior

Collaboration is present in Rende's research, with frequent coauthors including Giacomo Rizzolatti, Fred W. Sabb, Veronika Skvortsova, Kai-Christian Sonntag, and Takashi Suzuki.

Best Publications

  • Parental Smoking and Adolescent Smoking Initiation: An Intergenerational Perspective on Tobacco Control

    Stephen E. Gilman;Richard Rende;Julie Boergers;Julie Boergers;David B. Abrams

  • A Twin Study of Competence and Problem Behavior in Childhood and Early Adolescence

    Craig Edelbrock;Richard Rende;Robert Plomin;Lee Anne Thompson

  • Sisters, brothers, and delinquency: evaluating social influence during early and middle adolescence.

    Cheryl Slomkowski;Richard Rende;Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Ronald L. Simons

  • Educational attainment and cigarette smoking: a causal association?

    Stephen E Gilman;Laurie T Martin;David B Abrams;Ichiro Kawachi

  • Sibling effects on smoking in adolescence: evidence for social influence from a genetically informative design

    Cheryl Slomkowski;Richard Rende;Scott Novak;Elizabeth Lloyd-Richardson

  • Parental smoking exposure and adolescent smoking trajectories

    Darren Mays;Stephen E. Gilman;Richard Rende;George Luta

  • Human Behavioral Genetics

    Robert Plomin;Richard Rende

  • Psychiatric disorders in the relatives of depressed probands I. Comparison of prepubertal, adolescent and early adult onset cases

    Richard Harrington;Michael Rutter;Myrna Weissman;Hazel Fudge

  • Adjustment in Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence: Links with Earlier and Contemporary Sibling Relationships

    Judy Dunn;Cheryl Slomkowski;Lynn Beardsall;Richard Rende

  • Effects of progression to cigarette smoking on depressed mood in adolescents: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

    Marcus R. Munafò;Brian Hitsman;Richard Rende;Chris Metcalfe

  • Sibling effects on substance use in adolescence: social contagion and genetic relatedness.

    Richard Rende;Cheryl Slomkowski;Elizabeth Lloyd-Richardson;Raymond Niaura

  • LONGITUDINAL RELATIONS BETWEEN TEMPERAMENT TRAITS AND BEHAVIORAL SYNDROMES IN MIDDLE CHILDHOOD

    Richard D. Rende

  • A twin study of smoking, nicotine dependence, and major depression in men.

    Michael Lyons;Brian Hitsman;Hong Xian;Matthew S. Panizzon

  • Genetic and environmental influences on depressive symptomatology in adolescence: individual differences and extreme scores.

    Richard D. Rende;Robert Plomin;David Reiss;E. Mavis Hetherington

  • Phenomenology and classification of the childhood psychoses.

    Fred R. Volkmar;Donald J. Cohen;Yoshihiko Hoshino;Richard D. Rende

  • Genetic and environmental influences on maternal and sibling interaction in middle childhood: a sibling adoption study

    Richard D. Rende;Cheryl L. Slomkowski;Clare Stocker;David W. Fulker

  • Diathesis-stress models of psychopathology: A quantitative genetic perspective

    Richard Rende;Robert Plomin

  • Who discovered the twin method

    Richard D. Rende;Robert Plomin;Steven G. Vandenberg

  • Childhood-Onset Bipolar Disorder: Evidence for Increased Familial Loading of Psychiatric Illness

    Richard Rende;Boris Birmaher;David Axelson;Michael Strober

  • ANXIETY SENSITIVITY AS A PREDICTOR OF THE CLINICAL COURSE OF PANIC DISORDER: A 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY

    Carlos Israel Pérez Benítez;M. Tracie Shea;Susan Raffa;Richard Rende

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
Michael Rutter
Michael Rutter King's College London
Priya Wickramaratne
Priya Wickramaratne Columbia University
Melanie Killen
Melanie Killen University of Maryland, College Park
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Susan D. Holloway
Susan D. Holloway University of California, Berkeley
Andrew Pickles
Andrew Pickles King's College London
David W. Fulker
David W. Fulker University of Colorado Boulder
Lee A. Thompson
Lee A. Thompson Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous online degrees and career opportunities, especially in social work. Depending on your location, educational requirements for entering the social work profession can differ significantly across the country.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in Colorado typically starts at a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW), but further credentials may be necessary for advanced roles. If you're considering Connecticut, it's important to review the social worker education requirements in Connecticut, as they often require a Master of Social Work (MSW) for licensure and clinical positions.

Similarly, the Delaware minimum degree requirement for social workers is a BSW for entry-level roles, while higher positions demand further study. In Florida, the Florida minimum degree requirement for social workers is also a BSW, but more advanced jobs typically require a graduate degree and supervised clinical experience.

Online psychology and social work degrees offer flexible pathways to meet these diverse requirements, helping students prepare for rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Rende

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles