World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 30 11313 10576 1098 1047 86 5288

Alison Pike publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alison Pike between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alison Pike published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2009. 4 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2009. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1970 2025

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alison Pike: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 6
2010 4
2011 0
2012 3
2013 3
2014 3
2015 6
2016 3
2017 5
2018 2
2019 2
2020 5
2021 6
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 1
Total 97
Download as CSV

Alison Pike publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison Pike sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alison Pike D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison Pike sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 30
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alison Pike is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on psychology, medicine, and social sciences. Within these broader fields, their work delves deeply into clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, education, social psychology, and demography.

The core topics of Alison Pike's research focus on child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Other significant areas include maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, attachment and relationship dynamics, family dynamics and relationships, early childhood education and development, child welfare and adoption, as well as child abuse and trauma.

Alison Pike has published in a variety of academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • Psychiatric Quarterly
  • Psychological Studies
  • Adoption & Fostering

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Alison Pike include:

  • "Explaining the influence of non-shared environment (NSE) on symptoms of behaviour problems from preschool to adulthood: mind the missing NSE gap" (2022, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry)
  • "A Multilevel Approach to Understanding the Determinants of Maternal Harsh Parenting: the Importance of Maternal Age and Perceived Partner Support" (2021, Journal of Child and Family Studies)
  • "Household Chaos and Child Behavior Problems Predict Maternal Well-being" (2021, Psychiatric Quarterly)
  • "Co-parenting and Marital Satisfaction Predict Maternal Internalizing Problems When Expecting a Second Child" (2021, Psychological Studies)
  • "'Look after me too': A qualitative exploration of the transition into adoptive motherhood" (2021, Adoption & Fostering)

Alison Pike frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Notable frequent coauthors include Kinneret Levavi, Porat Yakov, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Amnon Hadar, and Guy Bar.

Best Publications

  • Household chaos - links with parenting and child behaviour.

    Joanne Coldwell;Alison Pike;Judy Dunn

  • Family Environment and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms and Antisocial Behavior: A Multivariate Genetic Analysis.

    Alison Pike;Shirley McGuire;E. Mavis Hetherington;David Reiss

  • Do risk factors for problem behaviour act in a cumulative manner? An examination of ethnic minority and majority children through an ecological perspective

    Naama Atzaba-Poria;Alison Pike;Kirby Deater-Deckard

  • Sibling relationships in early/middle childhood: links with individual adjustment.

    Alison Pike;Joanne Coldwell;Judith F Dunn

  • Nonshared Environmental Influences on Individual Differences in Early Behavioral Development: A Monozygotic Twin Differences Study.

    Karthryn Asbury;Judith F. Dunn;Alison Pike;Robert Plomin

  • Chaos in the home and socioeconomic status are associated with cognitive development in early childhood: Environmental mediators identified in a genetic design.

    Stephen A. Petrill;Alison Pike;Tom Price;Robert Plomin

  • Environmental risk and young children’s cognitive and behavioral development

    Alison Pike;Alessandra C. Iervolino;Thalia C. Eley;Thomas S. Price

  • Maternal scaffolding behavior: links with parenting style and maternal education.

    Amanda Carr;Alison Pike

  • Nonshared environmental processes in social‐emotional development: an observational study of identical twin differences in the preschool period

    Kirby Deater-Deckard;Alison Pike;Stephen A Petrill;Alexandra L Cutting

  • Using MZ Differences in the Search for Nonshared Environmental Effects

    Alison Pike;David Reiss;E. Mavis Hetherington;Robert Plomin

  • The impact of parents' mental health on parent-baby interaction: a prospective study.

    Ylva Parfitt;Alison Pike;Susan Ayers

  • Importance of nonshared environmental factors for childhood and adolescent psychopathology

    Alison Pike;Robert Plomin

  • Genetic and environmental influences in adolescent peer socialization: evidence from two genetically sensitive designs

    Alessandra C. Iervolino;Alison Pike;Beth Manke;David Reiss

  • Mother— and Father—Child Mutuality in Anglo and Indian British Families: A Link with Lower Externalizing Problems

    Kirby Deater-Deckard;Naama Atzaba-Poria;Alison Pike

  • Correlates of Parental Differential Treatment: Parental and Contextual Factors during Middle Childhood.

    Naama Atzaba-Poria;Alison Pike

  • The Validity of a Parent-based Assessment of Cognitive Abilities in Three-year Olds

    Bonamy Oliver;Philip S. Dale;Kimberly J. Saudino;Stephen A. Petrill

  • The role of adult attachment style, birth intervention and support in posttraumatic stress after childbirth: a prospective study

    Susan Ayers;Donna Jessop;Alison Pike;Ylva Parfitt

  • Infant developmental outcomes: a family systems perspective

    Ylva Parfitt;Alison Pike;Susan Ayers

  • Adolescent perceptions as mediators of parenting: genetic and environmental contributions.

    J M Neiderhiser;A Pike;E M Hetherington;D Reiss

  • Do sibling and friend relationships share the same temperamental origins? A twin study.

    Alison Pike;Naama Atzaba-Poria

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
David Reiss
David Reiss Yale University
Kirby Deater-Deckard
Kirby Deater-Deckard University of Massachusetts Amherst
Susan Ayers
Susan Ayers City, University of London
Jenae M. Neiderhiser
Jenae M. Neiderhiser Pennsylvania State University
E. Mavis Hetherington
E. Mavis Hetherington University of Virginia
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
Judy Dunn
Judy Dunn King's College London
Thalia C. Eley
Thalia C. Eley King's College London
Claire Hughes
Claire Hughes University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a variety of impactful careers. Many students consider clinical, counseling, and social work pathways that often require additional licensure and field-specific degrees. For instance, those interested in social work should be aware of the social worker degree requirements in Wyoming, which outline the educational and practical experience needed for entry into this rewarding field.

Aspiring counselors often explore Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) credentials. Every state sets its own requirements; for example, you can review the lpc licensure requirements in Alabama, lpc license requirements in Alaska, and lpc license requirements in Arizona for details on required coursework, supervised hours, and examinations.

Online degrees can provide flexibility, but it’s essential to verify that your chosen program meets licensure standards in your state. Thoroughly reviewing state-specific requirements ensures your degree supports your ultimate career goals within psychology and related helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Alison Pike

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles