World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 7037 6563 65 63 181 6503

Phoenix K. H. Mo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Phoenix K. H. Mo between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Phoenix K. H. Mo published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2021. 54 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2021. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 32 publications
1998 2025

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Phoenix K. H. Mo: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 3
2009 7
2010 7
2011 3
2012 3
2013 6
2014 4
2015 9
2016 7
2017 9
2018 18
2019 16
2020 30
2021 33
2022 30
2023 27
2024 22
2025 32
Total 270
Download as CSV

Phoenix K. H. Mo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phoenix K. H. Mo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 181
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Phoenix K. H. Mo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phoenix K. H. Mo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Phoenix K. H. Mo is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China. Their research spans multiple fields including Medicine, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with a significant focus on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, and Epidemiology among other subfields.

Their work covers a broad range of main topics, such as:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Child Development and Digital Technology

Phoenix K. H. Mo's recent papers include the following:

  • "Electronic health literacy and health-related outcomes among older adults: A systematic review", 2022, published in Preventive Medicine
  • "Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccination in China: Application of the Diffusion of Innovations Theory and the Moderating Role of Openness to Experience", 2021, published in Vaccines
  • "Prevalence and Interpersonal Correlates of Internet Gaming Disorders among Chinese Adolescents", 2020, published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Sense of coherence mediates the relationship between digital health literacy and anxiety about the future in aging population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a path analysis", 2021, published in Aging & Mental Health
  • "Social, Cognitive, and eHealth Mechanisms of COVID-19-Related Lockdown and Mandatory Quarantine That Potentially Affect the Mental Health of Pregnant Women in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study", 2020, published in Journal of Medical Internet Research

Publication venues frequently chosen by Phoenix K. H. Mo include:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Vaccines
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Among frequent co-authors are:

  • Joseph T. F. Lau
  • Zixin Wang
  • Yuan Fang
  • Luyao Xie
  • Siyu Chen

Best Publications

  • How effective are physical activity interventions for alleviating depressive symptoms in older people? A systematic review

    Holly Blake;Phoenix Kit Han Mo;Sumaira Malik;Shirley Thomas

  • Exploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: a content analysis of messages posted to an online HIV/AIDS support group.

    Phoenix K. H. Mo;Neil S. Coulson

  • Comparative stigma of HIV/AIDS, SARS, and tuberculosis in Hong Kong.

    Winnie W.S. Mak;Phoenix K.H. Mo;Rebecca Y.M. Cheung;Jean Woo

  • Empowering processes in online support groups among people living with HIV/AIDS: A comparative analysis of 'lurkers' and 'posters'

    Phoenix K. H. Mo;Neil S. Coulson

  • Help-seeking for mental health problems among Chinese: the application and extension of the theory of planned behavior.

    Phoenix K. H. Mo;Winnie W. S. Mak

  • Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: a systematic literature review of online health-related support groups.

    Phoenix K.H. Mo;Sumaira H. Malik;Neil S. Coulson

  • ‘Do as I say, but not as I do’: Are next generation nurses role models for health?:

    Holly Blake;Sumaira Malik;Phoenix K. H. Mo;Charlotte Pisano

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy of Promoting a Home-Based HIV Self-Testing with Online Counseling on Increasing HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

    Zixin Wang;Joseph T. F. Lau;Mary Ip;Shara P. Y. Ho

  • Are online support groups always beneficial? A qualitative exploration of the empowering and disempowering processes of participation within HIV/AIDS-related online support groups

    Phoenix K.H. Mo;Neil S. Coulson

  • Developing a model for online support group use, empowering processes and psychosocial outcomes for individuals living with HIV/AIDS.

    Phoenix K H Mo;Neil S Coulson

  • The role of social support on emotion dysregulation and Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: A structural equation model.

    Phoenix K.H. Mo;Virginia W.Y. Chan;Samuel W. Chan;Joseph T.F. Lau

  • Meta-analysis and systematic review of studies on the effectiveness of HIV stigma reduction programs.

    Winnie W.S. Mak;Phoenix K.H. Mo;Gloria Y.K. Ma;Maggie Y.Y. Lam

  • Online support group use and psychological health for individuals living with HIV/AIDS.

    Phoenix K.H. Mo;Neil S. Coulson

  • Roles of Self-Stigma, Social Support, and Positive and Negative Affects as Determinants of Depressive Symptoms Among HIV Infected Men who have Sex with Men in China

    Jinghua Li;Phoenix K. H. Mo;Anise M. S. Wu;Joseph T. F. Lau

  • Insomnia partially mediated the association between problematic Internet use and depression among secondary school students in China

    Ji-Bin Li;Ji-Bin Li;Joseph T. F. Lau;Phoenix K. H. Mo;Xue-Fen Su

  • Online social networking addiction and depression: The results from a large-scale prospective cohort study in Chinese adolescents

    Ji-Bin Li;Ji-Bin Li;Phoenix K. H. Mo;Joseph T. F. Lau;Xue-Fen Su

  • School-based gatekeeper training programmes in enhancing gatekeepers’ cognitions and behaviours for adolescent suicide prevention: a systematic review

    Phoenix K. H. Mo;Ting Ting Ko;Mei Qi Xin

  • Intention to Receive the COVID-19 Vaccination in China: Application of the Diffusion of Innovations Theory and the Moderating Role of Openness to Experience.

    Phoenix Kit Han Mo;Sitong Luo;Suhua Wang;Junfeng Zhao

  • Bidirectional predictions between Internet addiction and probable depression among Chinese adolescents.

    Joseph T. F. Lau;Danielle L. Walden;Anise M. S. Wu;Kit-man Cheng

  • Prevalence and Interpersonal Correlates of Internet Gaming Disorders among Chinese Adolescents.

    Xue Yang;Xuewen Jiang;Phoenix Kit-Han Mo;Yong Cai

  • Influenza vaccination uptake and associated factors among elderly population in Hong Kong: the application of the Health Belief Model

    P. K. H. Mo;J. T. F. Lau

  • Living with HIV/AIDS and use of online support groups.

    Phoenix K.H. Mo;Neil S. Coulson

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph Lau
Joseph Lau Chinese University of Hong Kong
Winnie W. S. Mak
Winnie W. S. Mak Chinese University of Hong Kong
Anise M. S. Wu
Anise M. S. Wu University of Macau
Neil S. Coulson
Neil S. Coulson University of Nottingham
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Linda D. Cameron
Linda D. Cameron University of California, Merced
Emily Y. Y. Chan
Emily Y. Y. Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Anne H. Berman
Anne H. Berman Uppsala University
Hi Yi Tsui
Hi Yi Tsui Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jean Woo
Jean Woo Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways. Many students interested in communication, development, or education often consider branching out into related fields, such as speech-language pathology. This dynamic profession requires specialized training and certification, which can vary significantly from state to state.

If you’re considering becoming a speech therapist in Missouri, you’ll need to complete graduate-level coursework and earn state licensure. Similarly, those interested in Montana speech pathologist certification requirements will find unique criteria and supervised clinical experiences tailored to Montana’s standards.

Many psychology graduates also explore how to become a speech language pathologist in Nebraska, where national certification and state-specific credentials are essential steps. For those targeting the western states, understanding Nevada slp certification requirements is crucial for entering local practice.

Pursuing online degrees in these fields offers flexibility for working adults and career changers. With the right education, you can advance your career and make a meaningful impact in a range of communities across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Phoenix K. H. Mo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles