World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8665 8097 4606 4197 147 4882

Tyrel J. Starks publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tyrel J. Starks between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tyrel J. Starks published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 24 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications
2009 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tyrel J. Starks: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 1
2011 0
2012 3
2013 4
2014 14
2015 9
2016 3
2017 19
2018 10
2019 14
2020 12
2021 24
2022 19
2023 16
2024 13
2025 11
Total 174
Download as CSV

Tyrel J. Starks publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tyrel J. Starks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tyrel J. Starks D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tyrel J. Starks sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tyrel J. Starks is affiliated with the City University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, with a significant focus on Social Psychology, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, and Epidemiology.

Their work covers a variety of topics related to health and social behavior, including:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Among their recent publications are:

  • Evaluating the impact of COVID-19: A cohort comparison study of drug use and risky sexual behavior among sexual minority men in the U.S.A., 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Testing the drug use and condomless anal sex link among sexual minority men: The predictive utility of marijuana and interactions with relationship status, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing with Sexual Minority Male Couples to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk: The Couples Health Project, 2021, AIDS and Behavior
  • Relationship Power and Intimate Partner Violence in Sexual Minority Male Couples, 2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Motivational interviewing with male couples to reduce substance use and HIV risk: Manifestations of partner discord and strategies for facilitating dyadic functioning, 2020, Psychotherapy

Tyrel J. Starks frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The researcher collaborates often with various coauthors, with the most frequent being:

  • Demetria Cain
  • Gabriel Robles
  • Trey V. Dellucci
  • Sylvie Naar
  • Daniel Sauermilch

Best Publications

  • Uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in a National Cohort of Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States

    Jeffrey T Parsons;H Jonathon Rendina;Jonathan M Lassiter;Thomas H F Whitfield

  • The influence of structural stigma and rejection sensitivity on young sexual minority men's daily tobacco and alcohol use

    John E. Pachankis;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Tyrel J. Starks

  • Alternatives to monogamy among gay male couples in a community survey: implications for mental health and sexual risk.

    Jeffrey T. Parsons;Tyrel J. Starks;Steve DuBois;Christian Grov

  • Non-monogamy and sexual relationship quality among same-sex male couples

    Jeffrey T. Parsons;Tyrel J. Starks;Kristi E. Gamarel;Christian Grov

  • The Critical Role of Intimacy in the Sexual Risk Behaviors of Gay and Bisexual Men

    Sarit A. Golub;Sarit A. Golub;Tyrel J. Starks;Gregory Payton;Jeffrey T. Parsons;Jeffrey T. Parsons

  • Relationship stigma and relationship outcomes in interracial and same-sex relationships: Examination of sources and buffers.

    Lisa Rosenthal;Tyrel J. Starks

  • Methods for the design and analysis of relationship and partner effects on sexual health.

    Brian Mustanski;Tyrel Starks;Michael E. Newcomb

  • Distinguishing hypothetical willingness from behavioral intentions to initiate HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): Findings from a large cohort of gay and bisexual men in the U.S.

    H. Jonathon Rendina;Thomas H.F. Whitfield;Christian Grov;Christian Grov;Tyrel J. Starks

  • Patterns of substance use among HIV-positive adults over 50: Implications for treatment and medication adherence

    Jeffrey T. Parsons;Tyrel J. Starks;Tyrel J. Starks;Brett M. Millar;Kailip Boonrai

  • Syndemic conditions and HIV transmission risk behavior among HIV-negative gay and bisexual men in a U.S. national sample.

    Jeffrey T Parsons;Brett M Millar;Raymond L Moody;Tyrel J Starks

  • The Impact of Comorbidities, Depression, and Substance Use Problems on Quality of Life Among Older Adults Living With HIV.

    Brett M. Millar;Tyrel J. Starks;Sitaji Gurung;Sitaji Gurung;Jeffrey T. Parsons

  • Evaluating the impact of COVID-19: A cohort comparison study of drug use and risky sexual behavior among sexual minority men in the U.S.A.

    Tyrel J. Starks;S. Scott Jones;Daniel Sauermilch;Matthew Benedict

  • Contextualizing Condom Use: Intimacy Interference Stigma and Unprotected Sex.

    Tyrel J Starks;Gregory Payton;Sarit A Golub;Corina L Weinberger

  • Adult Attachment Among Partnered Gay Men: Patterns and Associations with Sexual Relationship Quality

    Tyrel J. Starks;Jeffrey T. Parsons

  • Relationship Characteristics and HIV Transmission Risk in Same-Sex Male Couples in HIV Serodiscordant Relationships

    Tyrel J. Starks;Kristi E. Gamarel;Mallory O. Johnson

  • Drug Use and Sexual Arrangements Among Gay Couples: Frequency, Interdependence, and Associations with Sexual Risk

    Jeffrey T. Parsons;Tyrel J. Starks

  • Recruiting Drug Using Men Who Have Sex with Men in Behavioral Intervention Trials: A Comparison of Internet and Field-Based Strategies

    Jeffrey T. Parsons;Andrea C. Vial;Tyrel J. Starks;Sarit A. Golub

  • Internalized Homophobia and Drug Use in a National Cohort of Gay and Bisexual Men: Examining Depression, Sexual Anxiety, and Gay Community Attachment as Mediating Factors.

    Raymond L. Moody;Tyrel J. Starks;Christian Grov;Jeffrey T. Parsons

  • A Pilot Randomized Trial of Intervention Components Addressing Drug Use in Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) with Male Couples

    Tyrel J Starks;Tyrel J Starks;Trey V Dellucci;Sugandha Gupta;Gabriel Robles

  • Testing the Efficacy of Combined Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training to Reduce Methamphetamine Use and Improve HIV Medication Adherence Among HIV-Positive Gay and Bisexual Men

    Jeffrey T Parsons;Steven A John;Brett M Millar;Tyrel J Starks;Tyrel J Starks;Tyrel J Starks

  • Rules About Casual Sex Partners, Relationship Satisfaction, and HIV Risk in Partnered Gay and Bisexual Men

    Christian Grov;Tyrel J. Starks;H. Jonathon Rendina;Jeffrey Parsons

  • Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions Data Harmonization: Rationale and Development of Guidelines.

    Micah McCumber;Demetria Cain;Sara LeGrand;Kenneth H Mayer

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey T. Parsons
Jeffrey T. Parsons City University of New York
Christian Grov
Christian Grov City University of New York
H. Jonathon Rendina
H. Jonathon Rendina City University of New York
Sarit A. Golub
Sarit A. Golub City University of New York
Demetria Cain
Demetria Cain City University of New York
Ana Ventuneac
Ana Ventuneac Start Treatment & Recovery Centers
Rob Stephenson
Rob Stephenson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kristi E. Gamarel
Kristi E. Gamarel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Karen S. Ingersoll
Karen S. Ingersoll University of Virginia
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in studying psychology in the USA, there are many flexible online degree options available. These programs cater to a variety of career goals, whether you’re aiming for clinical practice, counseling, research, or human resources. Popular psychology specializations include clinical, developmental, and industrial-organizational psychology.

Regional trends can help guide your decision. For example, popular psychology degrees in Oklahoma focus on foundational topics with practical experiences, while popular psychology degrees in Orlando reflect a diverse student body, offering specializations in both applied and research tracks.

Some cities boast unique offerings in their academic and professional environments. Popular psychology programs in Reno emphasize cognitive and developmental psychology, whereas popular psychology programs in Seattle focus on integrative and evidence-based approaches.

Exploring online psychology degrees across these regions can open diverse career pathways, from school counseling to industrial consulting, clinical work, or academic research. Consider regional trends, specialization options, and local employment prospects as you plan your educational journey in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Tyrel J. Starks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles