World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing

Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8535 7969 4567 4158 131 6988

Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 18 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 10 publications
2008 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 8
2012 3
2013 5
2014 6
2015 20
2016 12
2017 10
2018 19
2019 5
2020 10
2021 17
2022 16
2023 9
2024 8
2025 10
Total 165
Download as CSV

Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 131
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine and psychology, with a focus on clinical and developmental aspects.

The main fields of study they contribute to include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Within these fields, their work is concentrated in several subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Their research topics cover a range of issues related to adolescent development, substance use, and health outcomes:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing has published multiple papers, some of their recent work includes:

  • Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders, 2022, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Prediction of suicidal ideation and attempt in 9 and 10 year-old children using transdiagnostic risk features, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • An update on the assessment of culture and environment in the ABCD Study®: Emerging literature and protocol updates over three measurement waves, 2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Measurement of gender and sexuality in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, 2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Substance use patterns in 9-10 year olds: Baseline findings from the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The venues in which their work frequently appears include:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Health Psychology
  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Genevieve F. Dash
  • Kristine Rømer Thomsen
  • Angela D. Bryan
  • Karen A. Hudson
  • Damien A. Fair

Best Publications

  • A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks

    Elena A. Allen;Erik B. Erhardt;Eswar Damaraju;William Gruner;William Gruner

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods

    Krista M. Lisdahl;Kenneth J. Sher;Kevin P. Conway;Raul Gonzalez

  • Identifying Neurobiological Phenotypes Associated with Alcohol Use Disorder Severity

    Eric D Claus;Sarah W Feldstein Ewing;Francesca M Filbey;Amithrupa Sabbineni

  • The effect of alcohol consumption on the adolescent brain: A systematic review of MRI and fMRI studies of alcohol-using youth.

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Ashok Sakhardande;Sarah Jayne Blakemore

  • Assessment of culture and environment in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Rationale, description of measures, and early data

    Robert A. Zucker;Raul Gonzalez;Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Martin P. Paulus

  • Identifying reproducible individual differences in childhood functional brain networks: An ABCD study.

    Scott Marek;Brenden Tervo-Clemmens;Ashley N. Nielsen;Muriah D. Wheelock

  • How psychosocial alcohol interventions work: a preliminary look at what FMRI can tell us.

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Francesca M. Filbey;Francesca M. Filbey;Amithrupa Sabbineni;Lindsay D. Chandler

  • Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Community MRI Collection and Utilities

    Feczko E;Conan G;Conan G;Marek S;Tervo-Clemmens B

  • Adolescent resilience to addiction: a social plasticity hypothesis.

    Janna Cousijn;Maartje Luijten;Sarah W Feldstein Ewing

  • What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.

    Heather LaChance;Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Angela D. Bryan;Kent E. Hutchison

  • Behavioral Control in Alcohol Use Disorders: Relationships With Severity

    Eric D. Claus;Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Francesca M. Filbey;Kent E. Hutchison;Kent E. Hutchison

  • Integrating brain and behavior: Evaluating adolescents' response to a cannabis intervention

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Amber D. McEachern;Uma Yezhuvath;Angela D. Bryan

  • Opioids Out, Cannabis in negotiating the unknowns in patient care for chronic pain

    Esther K. Choo;Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Travis I. Lovejoy

  • Evaluating the Hispanic Paradox in the Context of Adolescent Risky Sexual Behavior: The Role of Parent Monitoring

    Hollis C. Karoly;Tiffany Callahan;Sarah J. Schmiege;Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing

  • Approaching Retention within the ABCD Study.

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Linda Chang;Linda B. Cottler;Susan F. Tapert

  • Proposed model of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying psychosocial alcohol interventions: the example of motivational interviewing

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Francesca M. Filbey;Christian S. Hendershot;Amber D. McEachern

  • Implications of the ABCD study for developmental neuroscience.

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;James M. Bjork;Monica Luciana

  • An update on the assessment of culture and environment in the ABCD Study®: Emerging literature and protocol updates over three measurement waves

    Raul Gonzalez;Erin L. Thompson;Mariana Sanchez;Amanda Morris

  • Rates of Incidental Findings in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children

    Yi Li;Wesley K. Thompson;Chase Reuter;Ryan Nillo

  • Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample.

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Heather A. LaChance;Angela Bryan;Kent E. Hutchison

  • Prediction of suicidal ideation and attempt in 9 and 10 year-old children using transdiagnostic risk features.

    Gareth Harman;Dakota Kliamovich;Angelica M. Morales;Sydney Gilbert

  • Neuroimaging mechanisms of change in psychotherapy for addictive behaviors: emerging translational approaches that bridge biology and behavior

    Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing;Tammy Chung

Frequent Co-Authors

Angela D. Bryan
Angela D. Bryan University of Colorado Boulder
Kent E. Hutchison
Kent E. Hutchison University of Colorado Boulder
Francesca M. Filbey
Francesca M. Filbey The University of Texas at Dallas
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Tammy Chung
Tammy Chung Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Raul Gonzalez
Raul Gonzalez Florida International University
Hugh Garavan
Hugh Garavan University of Vermont
Bonnie J. Nagel
Bonnie J. Nagel Oregon Health & Science University
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Damien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology offers diverse pathways, particularly if you are interested in mental health counseling. Many professionals begin by earning a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field, followed by a specialized master’s degree program. To practice as a licensed counselor, each state has its own requirements regarding education, supervised clinical experience, and examination.

For those aspiring to become mental health counselors in specific areas, it’s important to understand the local regulations and procedures. You can find detailed guidance on Charlotte mental health counselor education requirements, as well as resources related to Chesapeake mental health counselor education requirements.

Students considering metropolitan areas may explore how to become a mental health counselor in Chicago for guidance on licensure and training. Similarly, if you are interested in opportunities on the West Coast, review Chula Vista mental health counselor education requirements.

Online psychology degrees can provide flexibility and accessibility for students in different locations, helping them meet these standards while balancing other commitments and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles