World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3096 2852 1761 1586 175 16710

Bonnie J. Nagel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bonnie J. Nagel between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bonnie J. Nagel published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2021. 24 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications
1999 2025

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bonnie J. Nagel: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 5
2006 2
2007 11
2008 4
2009 2
2010 7
2011 6
2012 5
2013 6
2014 5
2015 13
2016 10
2017 14
2018 6
2019 8
2020 10
2021 31
2022 9
2023 12
2024 13
2025 11
Total 196
Download as CSV

Bonnie J. Nagel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonnie J. Nagel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bonnie J. Nagel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonnie J. Nagel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bonnie J. Nagel is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research focuses on areas spanning medicine, neuroscience, and psychology, with substantial contributions in cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

They have contributed extensively to topics including functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, mental health research topics, and health, environment, and cognitive aging.

Their recent significant publications include:

  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Community MRI Collection and Utilities, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Demographic and mental health assessments in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study: Updates and age-related trajectories, 2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Impact of Childhood Trauma on Executive Function in Adolescence-Mediating Functional Brain Networks and Prediction of High-Risk Drinking, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Prediction of suicidal ideation and attempt in 9 and 10 year-old children using transdiagnostic risk features, 2021, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Fiona C. Baker
  • Susan F. Tapert
  • Duncan B. Clark
  • Scott A. Jones
  • Sandra A. Brown

Their work is often published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Best Publications

  • Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Bharat B. Biswal;Maarten Mennes;Xi Nian Zuo;Suril Gohel

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Adolescent neurocognitive development and impacts of substance use: Overview of the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) baseline neurocognition battery.

    Monica M Luciana;J. M. Bjork;B. J. Nagel

  • Prefrontal Cortex Volumes in Adolescents With Alcohol Use Disorders: Unique Gender Effects

    Krista Lisdahl Medina;Timothy McQueeny;Bonnie J. Nagel;Karen L. Hanson;Karen L. Hanson

  • Atypical Default Network Connectivity in Youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Damien A. Fair;Jonathan Posner;Bonnie J. Nagel;Deepti Bathula

  • Reduced hippocampal volume among adolescents with alcohol use disorders without psychiatric comorbidity.

    Bonnie J. Nagel;Alecia D. Schweinsburg;Vinh Phan;Susan F. Tapert;Susan F. Tapert

  • Neuropsychological functioning in adolescent marijuana users: subtle deficits detectable after a month of abstinence.

    Krista Lisdahl Medina;Karen L. Hanson;Alecia D. Schweinsburg;Mairav Cohen-Zion

  • Effects of alcohol and combined marijuana and alcohol use during adolescence on hippocampal volume and asymmetry

    Krista Lisdahl Medina;Alecia D. Schweinsburg;Mairav Cohen-Zion;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • The Impact of Sex, Puberty, and Hormones on White Matter Microstructure in Adolescents

    Megan M. Herting;Emily C. Maxwell;Christy Irvine;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • Real-time motion analytics during brain MRI improve data quality and reduce costs

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Jonathan M. Koller;Eric A. Earl;Oscar Miranda-Dominguez

  • Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates

    Damien A. Fair;Oscar Miranda-Dominguez;Abraham Z. Snyder;Anders Perrone

  • The National Consortium on Alcohol and NeuroDevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA): a multisite study of adolescent development and substance use

    Sandra A. Brown;Ty Brumback;Kristin Tomlinson;Kevin Cummins

  • Abstinent adolescent marijuana users show altered fMRI response during spatial working memory

    Alecia D. Schweinsburg;Bonnie J. Nagel;Brian C. Schweinsburg;Brian C. Schweinsburg;Ann Park

  • Altered white matter microstructure in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Bonnie J. Nagel;Deepti Bathula;Megan Herting;Colleen Schmitt

  • Prefrontal cortex morphometry in abstinent adolescent marijuana users: Subtle gender effects.

    Krista Lisdahl Medina;Tim McQueeny;Bonnie J. Nagel;Karen L. Hanson;Karen L. Hanson

  • Altered Brain Developmental Trajectories in Adolescents After Initiating Drinking

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Dongjin Kwon;Ty Brumback;Wesley K. Thompson

  • The structure of cognition in 9 and 10 year-old children and associations with problem behaviors: Findings from the ABCD study’s baseline neurocognitive battery

    Wesley K. Thompson;M Deanna;James M. Bjork;Raul Gonzalez

  • Premotor functional connectivity predicts impulsivity in juvenile offenders.

    Benjamin J. Shannon;Marcus E. Raichle;Abraham Z. Snyder;Damien A. Fair

  • Gender and adolescent alcohol use disorders on BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) response to spatial working memory.

    Lisa C. Caldwell;Alecia D. Schweinsburg;Bonnie J. Nagel;Valerie C. Barlett

  • Maturing Thalamocortical Functional Connectivity Across Development

    Damien A. Fair;Deepti Bathula;Kathryn L. Mills;Taciana G. Costa Dias

  • A preliminary study of functional magnetic resonance imaging response during verbal encoding among adolescent binge drinkers

    Alecia D. Schweinsburg;Tim McQueeny;Bonnie J. Nagel;Lisa T. Eyler;Lisa T. Eyler

  • Reduced hippocampal volume among adolescents with alcohol use disorders without psychiatric comorbidity. - eScholarship

    Bonnie J Nagel;Alecia D Schweinsburg;Vinh Phan;Susan F Tapert

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Fiona C. Baker
Fiona C. Baker SRI International
Duncan B. Clark
Duncan B. Clark University of Pittsburgh
Damien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair University of Minnesota
Megan M. Herting
Megan M. Herting University of Southern California
Michael D. De Bellis
Michael D. De Bellis Duke University
Edith V. Sullivan
Edith V. Sullivan Stanford University
Sandra A. Brown
Sandra A. Brown University of California, San Diego
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and flexible career options. Many students pursue programs in counseling, mental health, or social work alongside psychology, as these fields offer strong job prospects and opportunities to make a lasting impact.

Finding the right program often comes down to balancing quality and affordability. Especially for those interested in counseling pathways, it’s important to compare tuition rates and available financial aid. For example, you can review affordable counseling programs in California or consider affordable counseling programs in Chicago if you are looking within these major regions.

Online programs add even more flexibility, letting students balance education with work and personal commitments. States like Colorado and Connecticut offer cost-effective options as well, such as affordable counseling programs in Colorado and affordable counseling programs in Connecticut.

Whether aiming for clinical practice, education, or community support roles, these pathways help you start a rewarding career while managing your investment in higher education.

Best Scientists Citing Bonnie J. Nagel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles