World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 86 1132 993 700 598 263 29489

Wesley K. Thompson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wesley K. Thompson between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wesley K. Thompson published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 18.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2021. 42 of the 445 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 65 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 24 publications
2002 2025

445 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wesley K. Thompson: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 3
2007 3
2008 7
2009 8
2010 6
2011 16
2012 9
2013 20
2014 17
2015 19
2016 30
2017 22
2018 34
2019 37
2020 39
2021 65
2022 34
2023 30
2024 18
2025 24
Total 445
Download as CSV

Wesley K. Thompson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wesley K. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 263 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 263
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Wesley K. Thompson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wesley K. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 86
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wesley K. Thompson is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Psychology, with significant focus on Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their work has addressed various topics such as Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Mental Health Research Topics, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging.

Thompson's recent publications reflect a strong engagement with brain research and reproducibility in neuroscience. Key papers include:

  • "Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals" (2022, Nature)
  • "Towards Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies" (2020, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])
  • "Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study" (2021, NeuroImage)
  • "Understanding the genetic determinants of the brain with MOSTest" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Recalibrating expectations about effect size: A multi-method survey of effect sizes in the ABCD study" (2021, PLoS ONE)

Frequent co-authors in Thompson's work include:

  • Anders M. Dale
  • Chun Chieh Fan
  • Terry L. Jernigan
  • Ole A. Andreassen
  • Robert Loughnan

Their research has appeared regularly in several publication venues, highlighting contributions mainly to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Nature Communications
  • NeuroImage
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression

    Naomi R. Wray;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Manuel Mattheisen;MacIej Trzaskowski

  • Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism

    F. Kyle Satterstrom;F. Kyle Satterstrom;Jack A. Kosmicki;Jiebiao Wang;Michael S. Breen

  • Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures

    H. Garavan;H. Bartsch;K. Conway;A. Decastro

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Increased amygdala and decreased dorsolateral prefrontal BOLD responses in unipolar depression: related and independent features.

    Greg J. Siegle;Wesley Thompson;Cameron S. Carter;Stuart R. Steinhauer

  • Two-Year Outcomes for Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy in Individuals With Bipolar I Disorder

    Ellen Frank;David J. Kupfer;Michael E. Thase;Alan G. Mallinger

  • International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci

    Caroline M. Nievergelt;Caroline M. Nievergelt;Adam X. Maihofer;Adam X. Maihofer;Torsten Klengel;Torsten Klengel;Elizabeth G. Atkinson;Elizabeth G. Atkinson

  • Association between older age and more successful aging: critical role of resilience and depression.

    Dilip V. Jeste;Gauri N. Savla;Wesley K. Thompson;Ipsit V. Vahia

  • Improved Detection of Common Variants Associated with Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Using Pleiotropy-Informed Conditional False Discovery Rate

    Ole A. Andreassen;Wesley K. Thompson;Andrew J. Schork;Stephan Ripke

  • Genetic assessment of age-associated Alzheimer disease risk: Development and validation of a polygenic hazard score

    Rahul S. Desikan;Chun Chieh Fan;Yunpeng Wang;Yunpeng Wang;Yunpeng Wang;Andrew J. Schork

  • Daytime symptoms in primary insomnia: a prospective analysis using ecological momentary assessment.

    Daniel J. Buysse;Wesley Thompson;John Scott;Peter L. Franzen

  • The Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics (PING) Data Repository

    Terry L. Jernigan;Timothy T. Brown;Donald J. Hagler;Natacha Akshoomoff

  • Development and aging of cortical thickness correspond to genetic organization patterns.

    Anders Martin Fjell;Anders Martin Fjell;Håkon Grydeland;Stine Kleppe Krogsrud;Inge Kasbohm Amlien

  • Sleep deprivation alters pupillary reactivity to emotional stimuli in healthy young adults.

    Peter L. Franzen;Daniel J. Buysse;Ronald E. Dahl;Wesley Thompson

  • Toward clinically useful neuroimaging in depression treatment: prognostic utility of subgenual cingulate activity for determining depression outcome in cognitive therapy across studies, scanners, and patient characteristics

    Greg J. Siegle;Wesley K. Thompson;Amanda Collier;Susan R. Berman

  • Modifying resilience mechanisms in at-risk individuals: a controlled study of mindfulness training in Marines preparing for deployment

    Douglas C. Johnson;Nathaniel J. Thom;Elizabeth A. Stanley;Lori Haase

  • A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE.

    Trang T Le;Trang T Le;Rayus T Kuplicki;Brett A McKinney;Hung-Wen Yeh

  • Daily Emotional Dynamics in Depressed Youth: A Cell Phone Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

    Jennifer S. Silk;Erika E. Forbes;Diana J. Whalen;Jennifer L. Jakubcak

  • The National Consortium on Alcohol and NeuroDevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA): a multisite study of adolescent development and substance use

    Sandra A. Brown;Ty Brumback;Kristin Tomlinson;Kevin Cummins

  • Screen media activity and brain structure in youth: Evidence for diverse structural correlation networks from the ABCD study.

    Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus;Lindsay M. Squeglia;Kara Bagot;Joanna Jacobus

  • Genetic topography of brain morphology

    Chi Hua Chen;Mark Fiecas;E. D. Gutiérrez;Matthew S. Panizzon

Frequent Co-Authors

Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Thomas Werge
Thomas Werge University of Copenhagen
Yunpeng Wang
Yunpeng Wang University of Oslo
Andrew J. Schork
Andrew J. Schork University of Copenhagen
Merete Nordentoft
Merete Nordentoft University of Copenhagen
Ole Mors
Ole Mors Aarhus University
Srdjan Djurovic
Srdjan Djurovic Oslo University Hospital
Anders D. Børglum
Anders D. Børglum Aarhus University
Preben Bo Mortensen
Preben Bo Mortensen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a range of career pathways, from counseling to mental health services. As demand for mental health professionals grows, flexibility and affordability have become top priorities for students considering these fields.

For aspiring counselors, affordability can make a significant difference. If you’re seeking budget-friendly options, you’ll find some of the cheapest counseling programs in Des Moines and the cheapest counseling degrees in Illinois available online and on-campus. These programs provide quality education without the high price tag.

Prospective students in the southern United States may look to affordable counseling programs in Florida or affordable counseling programs in Georgia to find flexible degrees tailored to local markets. Graduating from these affordable programs can prepare you for roles in schools, clinics, community organizations, or private practice.

Whether you’re interested in clinical work or research, choosing the right degree pathway is essential. Comparing program costs and formats can help you launch a rewarding career in psychology while minimizing student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Wesley K. Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles