World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
8878
World Ranking
6418
National Ranking
2787

Megan M. Herting publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan M. Herting sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 112 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Megan M. Herting D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan M. Herting sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Megan M. Herting is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States and has a research profile spanning medicine and environmental science. Their work intersects multiple subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cognitive neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, as well as speech and hearing.

The scientist's research covers a variety of main topics, notably:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Herting has contributed to numerous papers, some of which have attracted considerable citations. Recent examples include:

  • The Roles of Physical Activity, Exercise, and Fitness in Promoting Resilience During Adolescence: Effects on Mental Well-Being and Brain Development (2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging)
  • Inter-individual variability in structural brain development from late childhood to young adulthood (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Fine particulate matter exposure during childhood relates to hemispheric-specific differences in brain structure (2020, Environment International)
  • Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study Linked External Data (LED): Protocol and practices for geocoding and assignment of environmental data (2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)
  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology)

Frequent coauthors in Herting's work include Hedyeh Ahmadi, Katherine L. Bottenhorn, Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez, Daniel A. Hackman, and Devyn L. Cotter.

The scientist regularly publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Environment International, ISEE Conference Abstracts, and NeuroImage.

Best Publications

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence: A multisample study of inter-related longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area, and thickness

    Christian Krog Tamnes;Megan M. Herting;Anne-Lise Goddings;Rosa Meuwese

  • Structural brain development between childhood and adulthood: Convergence across four longitudinal samples

    Kathryn L. Mills;Anne-Lise Goddings;Megan M. Herting;Rosa Meuwese

  • The Impact of Sex, Puberty, and Hormones on White Matter Microstructure in Adolescents

    Megan M. Herting;Emily C. Maxwell;Christy Irvine;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • Puberty and structural brain development in humans.

    Megan M. Herting;Elizabeth R. Sowell

  • The Roles of Physical Activity, Exercise, and Fitness in Promoting Resilience During Adolescence: Effects on Mental Well-Being and Brain Development.

    Britni R. Belcher;Jennifer Zink;Anisa Azad;Claire E. Campbell

  • The role of testosterone and estradiol in brain volume changes across adolescence: a longitudinal structural MRI study.

    Megan M. Herting;Prapti Gautam;Jeffrey M. Spielberg;Eric Kan

  • Altered white matter microstructure in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    Bonnie J. Nagel;Deepti Bathula;Megan Herting;Colleen Schmitt

  • Development of subcortical volumes across adolescence in males and females: A multisample study of longitudinal changes

    Megan M. Herting;Cory Johnson;Kathryn L. Mills;Nandita Vijayakumar

  • Aerobic fitness relates to learning on a virtual morris water task and hippocampal volume in adolescents

    Megan M. Herting;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • A Longitudinal Study: Changes in Cortical Thickness and Surface Area during Pubertal Maturation

    Megan M. Herting;Prapti Gautam;Jeffrey M. Spielberg;Ronald E. Dahl

  • Delay discounting behavior and white matter microstructure abnormalities in youth with a family history of alcoholism.

    Megan M. Herting;Daniel Schwartz;Suzanne H. Mitchell;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • Quality Control of Structural MRI Images Applied Using FreeSurfer—A Hands-On Workflow to Rate Motion Artifacts

    Lea L Backhausen;Megan M Herting;Judith Buse;Veit Roessner

  • Hemispheric Lateralization of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory during Adolescence.

    Bonnie J. Nagel;Megan M. Herting;Emily C. Maxwell;Richard Bruno

  • Inter-individual variability in structural brain development from late childhood to young adulthood.

    Kathryn L. Mills;Kimberly D. Siegmund;Christian K. Tamnes;Lia Ferschmann

  • Exercise, cognition, and the adolescent brain.

    Megan M. Herting;Xiaofang Chu

  • Fine particulate matter exposure during childhood relates to hemispheric-specific differences in brain structure.

    Dora Cserbik;Jiu-Chiuan Chen;Rob McConnell;Kiros Berhane

  • Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study Linked External Data (LED): Protocol and Practices for Geocoding and Assignment of Environmental Data

    Chun Chieh Fan;Andrew Marshall;Harry Smolker;Marybel R. Gonzalez

  • Altered fronto-cerebellar connectivity in alcohol-naïve youth with a family history of alcoholism

    Megan M. Herting;Damien A. Fair;Bonnie J. Nagel

  • Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health.

    K.S. Bagot;S.A. Matthews;M. Mason;Lindsay M. Squeglia

  • Test-retest reliability of longitudinal task-based fMRI: Implications for developmental studies.

    Megan M. Herting;Prapti Gautam;Prapti Gautam;Zhanghua Chen;Adam Mezher

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth R. Sowell
Elizabeth R. Sowell University of Southern California
Bonnie J. Nagel
Bonnie J. Nagel Oregon Health & Science University
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego
Damien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair University of Minnesota
Christian K. Tamnes
Christian K. Tamnes University of Oslo
Fiona C. Baker
Fiona C. Baker SRI International
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd
Deborah A. Yurgelun-Todd University of Utah
Duncan B. Clark
Duncan B. Clark University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Neuroscience opens doors to diverse academic and professional avenues. Many students explore related fields such as social work, behavioral science, and psychology to broaden their impact in healthcare and research.

For those interested in practical, people-focused roles, earning a Master of Social Work is a popular choice. Flexible affordable msw programs online help students manage costs while working toward advanced credentials. Those looking to enter the field more quickly might consider a social work accelerated program for faster degree completion.

Students passionate about behavioral science may also pursue credentials as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Finding the cheapest bcba online program can make this career path more accessible and affordable.

Additionally, those seeking to deepen their understanding of human behavior often explore psychology degrees. Many colleges with accelerated psychology programs now offer online formats, enabling faster entry into the workforce or further graduate study.

Best Scientists Citing Megan M. Herting

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles