World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
11755
World Ranking
4575
National Ranking
2540

Lindsay M. Squeglia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay M. Squeglia sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lindsay M. Squeglia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay M. Squeglia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lindsay M. Squeglia is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions to pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, pharmacology, epidemiology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Squeglia has co-authored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Rachel L. Tomko
  • Kevin M. Gray
  • Anna E. Kirkland
  • Louise Mewton
  • Brittney D. Browning

Their frequent publication venues reflect a particular interest in substance use and neuropsychiatric research, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Among the recent notable publications are:

  • Effect of alcohol use on the adolescent brain and behavior, 2020, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Association of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure With Psychological, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, 2020, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Altered Neurocognitive Functional Connectivity and Activation Patterns Underlie Psychopathology in Preadolescence, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Passive Sensing of Preteens' Smartphone Use: An Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Cohort Substudy, 2021, JMIR Mental Health

Best Publications

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

    Unknown

  • The Influence of Substance Use on Adolescent Brain Development

    L. M. Squeglia;J. Jacobus;Susan F. Tapert

  • The rise of e-cigarettes, pod mod devices, and JUUL among youth: Factors influencing use, health implications, and downstream effects.

    Matthew C. Fadus;Tracy T. Smith;Lindsay M. Squeglia

  • Effect of alcohol use on the adolescent brain and behavior.

    Briana Lees;Lindsay R. Meredith;Anna E. Kirkland;Brittany E. Bryant

  • Research Review: What have we learned about adolescent substance use?

    Kevin M. Gray;Lindsay M. Squeglia

  • Adolescent Binge Drinking Linked to Abnormal Spatial Working Memory Brain Activation: Differential Gender Effects

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Alecia Dager Schweinsburg;Carmen Pulido;Susan F. Tapert

  • Neural Activation during Inhibition Predicts Initiation of Substance Use in Adolescence

    Andria L. Norman;Carmen Pulido;Lindsay M. Squeglia;Andrea D. Spadoni;Andrea D. Spadoni

  • Initiating moderate to heavy alcohol use predicts changes in neuropsychological functioning for adolescent girls and boys.

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Andrea D. Spadoni;M. Alejandra Infante;Mark G. Myers

  • Brain Development in Heavy Drinking Adolescents

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Susan F. Tapert;Edith V. Sullivan;Joanna Jacobus

  • Alcohol and Drug Use and the Developing Brain.

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Kevin M. Gray

  • Screen media activity and brain structure in youth: Evidence for diverse structural correlation networks from the ABCD study.

    Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus;Lindsay M. Squeglia;Kara Bagot;Joanna Jacobus

  • Binge drinking differentially affects adolescent male and female brain morphometry.

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Scott F. Sorg;Alecia Dager Schweinsburg;Reagan R. Wetherill

  • The effect of alcohol use on human adolescent brain structures and systems.

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Joanna Jacobus;Susan F. Tapert;Susan F. Tapert

  • Unconscious Bias and the Diagnosis of Disruptive Behavior Disorders and ADHD in African American and Hispanic Youth.

    Matthew C Fadus;Kenneth R Ginsburg;Kunmi Sobowale;Colleen A Halliday-Boykins

  • A longitudinal examination of adolescent response inhibition: neural differences before and after the initiation of heavy drinking.

    Reagan R. Wetherill;Lindsay M. Squeglia;Tony T. Yang;Susan F. Tapert;Susan F. Tapert

  • Brain Response to Working Memory Over Three Years of Adolescence: Influence of Initiating Heavy Drinking

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Carmen Pulido;Reagan R. Wetherill;Joanna Jacobus

  • Brain volume reductions in adolescent heavy drinkers.

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Daniel A. Rinker;Hauke Bartsch;Norma Castro

  • Association of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure With Psychological, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

    Briana Lees;Louise Mewton;Joanna Jacobus;Emilio A. Valadez

  • Neural Predictors of Initiating Alcohol Use During Adolescence

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Tali M. Ball;Joanna Jacobus;Ty Brumback

  • White matter characterization of adolescent binge drinking with and without co-occurring marijuana use: A 3-year investigation

    Joanna Jacobus;Lindsay M. Squeglia;Sunita Bava;Susan F. Tapert

  • Recent binge drinking predicts smaller cerebellar volumes in adolescents.

    Krista M. Lisdahl;Krista M. Lisdahl;Rachel Thayer;Lindsay M. Squeglia;Tim M. McQueeny

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Joanna Jacobus
Joanna Jacobus University of California, San Diego
Kevin M. Gray
Kevin M. Gray Medical University of South Carolina
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Amanda Sheffield Morris
Amanda Sheffield Morris Oklahoma State University
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Anthony Steven Dick
Anthony Steven Dick Florida International University
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego
Deanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about pursuing a career in psychology? There are many flexible online degree programs that can prepare you for a range of rewarding pathways, including becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) in the United States.

If your goal is professional licensure, it’s important to understand each state’s unique requirements. For example, the lpc license requirements in Massachusetts include completion of a graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and successful passing of a national exam. Similarly, Michigan licensed professional counselor requirements emphasize graduate education and post-degree clinical practice hours.

Requirements can also differ significantly across other states, such as the Minnesota licensed professional counselor requirements and the steps outlined for how to get an lpc license in Mississippi. Students should review the specific educational, experience, and examination criteria for the state where they plan to practice.

These differences highlight the value of choosing an accredited online psychology program that aligns with your preferred career track and licensure goals. Always research your state’s requirements before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Lindsay M. Squeglia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles