World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3390 3122 1636 1483 186 9386

Kevin M. Gray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kevin M. Gray between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kevin M. Gray published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2023. 49 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2023. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 22 publications
2003 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kevin M. Gray: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 3
2009 3
2010 7
2011 5
2012 6
2013 8
2014 17
2015 14
2016 17
2017 14
2018 17
2019 18
2020 16
2021 18
2022 15
2023 32
2024 27
2025 22
Total 261
Download as CSV

Kevin M. Gray publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin M. Gray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 186 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 186
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kevin M. Gray D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin M. Gray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kevin M. Gray is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research spans several areas within medicine, with a focus on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical psychology, physiology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health. Their work is documented across 177 publications in these main fields of study.

The scientist's research topics notably include cannabis and cannabinoid research, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, smoking behavior and cessation, prenatal substance exposure effects, behavioral health and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and 3D printing in biomedical research.

Kevin M. Gray has published frequently in several journals, with multiple works appearing in Drug and Alcohol Dependence (16 publications), Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (11 publications), Journal of Hepatology (7 publications), Nicotine & Tobacco Research (5 publications), and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (4 publications).

Recent papers by Kevin M. Gray include the following:

  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Effect of unguided e-cigarette provision on uptake, use, and smoking cessation among adults who smoke in the USA: a naturalistic, randomised, controlled clinical trial, 2023, EClinicalMedicine
  • The state of clinical outcome assessments for cannabis use disorder clinical trials: A review and research agenda, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Rates of Incidental Findings in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children, 2021, JAMA Neurology

Frequent co-authors working with Kevin M. Gray include:

  • Rachel L. Tomko
  • Lindsay M. Squeglia
  • Nathaniel L. Baker
  • Aimee L. McRae-Clark
  • Erin A. McClure

Best Publications

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

    Unknown

  • A double-blind randomized controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine in cannabis-dependent adolescents.

    Kevin M. Gray;Matthew J. Carpenter;Matthew J. Carpenter;Nathaniel L. Baker;Nathaniel L. Baker;Stacia M. DeSantis;Stacia M. DeSantis

  • Research Review: What have we learned about adolescent substance use?

    Kevin M. Gray;Lindsay M. Squeglia

  • Alcohol and Drug Use and the Developing Brain.

    Lindsay M. Squeglia;Kevin M. Gray

  • Oral Cannabidiol does not Alter the Subjective, Reinforcing or Cardiovascular Effects of Smoked Cannabis

    Margaret Haney;Robert J Malcolm;Shanna Babalonis;Paul A Nuzzo

  • Determining menstrual phase in human biobehavioral research: A review with recommendations

    Alicia M Allen;Aimee L. McRae-Clark;Samantha Carlson;Michael E. Saladin

  • Potential Role of N-Acetylcysteine in the Management of Substance Use Disorders

    Erin A. McClure;Cassandra D. Gipson;Robert J. Malcolm;Peter W. Kalivas

  • A randomized placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine for cannabis use disorder in adults.

    Kevin M. Gray;Susan C. Sonne;Erin A. McClure;Udi E. Ghitza

  • Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.

    James F. Thrasher;Matthew J. Carpenter;Jeannette O. Andrews;Kevin M. Gray

  • Reductions in cannabis use are associated with improvements in anxiety, depression, and sleep quality, but not quality of life.

    Yih-Ing Hser;Larissa J. Mooney;David Huang;Yuhui Zhu

  • Nicotine therapy sampling to induce quit attempts among smokers unmotivated to quit: a randomized clinical trial.

    Matthew J. Carpenter;John R. Hughes;Kevin M. Gray;Amy E. Wahlquist

  • N‐Acetylcysteine (NAC) in Young Marijuana Users: An Open‐Label Pilot Study

    Kevin M. Gray;Noreen L. Watson;Matthew J. Carpenter;Steven D. LaRowe;Steven D. LaRowe

  • Gender differences in craving and cue reactivity to smoking and negative affect/stress cues.

    Michael E. Saladin;Kevin M. Gray;Matthew J. Carpenter;Steven D. LaRowe;Steven D. LaRowe

  • Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health.

    K.S. Bagot;S.A. Matthews;M. Mason;Lindsay M. Squeglia

  • Cognitive enhancers in the treatment of substance use disorders: clinical evidence.

    Kathleen T. Brady;Kevin M. Gray;Bryan K. Tolliver

  • A double blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of post-retrieval propranolol on reconsolidation of memory for craving and cue reactivity in cocaine dependent humans

    Michael E. Saladin;Kevin M. Gray;Aimee L. McRae-Clark;Steven D. LaRowe;Steven D. LaRowe

  • Systematic and meta-analytic review of research examining the impact of menstrual cycle phase and ovarian hormones on smoking and cessation.

    Andrea H. Weinberger;Philip H. Smith;Sharon S. Allen;Kelly P. Cosgrove

  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

    Megan M. Herting;Kristina A. Uban;Marybel Robledo Gonzalez;Marybel Robledo Gonzalez;Fiona C. Baker

  • A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial of N -Acetylcysteine in Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders

    Sudie E. Back;Sudie E. Back;Jenna L. McCauley;Kristina J. Korte;Kristina J. Korte;Daniel F. Gros;Daniel F. Gros

  • Association between ovarian hormones and smoking behavior in women.

    Crystal Edler Schiller;Michael E. Saladin;Kevin M. Gray;Karen J. Hartwell

  • Bupropion SR and contingency management for adolescent smoking cessation

    Kevin M. Gray;Matthew J. Carpenter;Nathaniel L. Baker;Karen J. Hartwell

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew J. Carpenter
Matthew J. Carpenter Medical University of South Carolina
Michael E. Saladin
Michael E. Saladin Medical University of South Carolina
Lindsay M. Squeglia
Lindsay M. Squeglia Medical University of South Carolina
Aimee L. McRae-Clark
Aimee L. McRae-Clark Medical University of South Carolina
Himanshu P. Upadhyaya
Himanshu P. Upadhyaya Eli Lilly (United States)
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Joanna Jacobus
Joanna Jacobus University of California, San Diego
Anthony Steven Dick
Anthony Steven Dick Florida International University
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Angela R. Laird
Angela R. Laird Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for social sciences and humanities professionals grows, students are increasingly choosing flexible online degree options. Many universities in the USA now offer online masters programs that are ideal for professionals seeking career advancement or specialization without putting their careers on hold.

If you are looking to complete your education faster, accelerated programs can help you earn your bachelor's degree in less time than traditional routes. These programs allow motivated learners to quickly transition into the workforce or move forward to advanced studies.

Specialized fields, such as social work, also offer flexible pathways. Prospective social workers can find msw degree programs online that are both reputable and financially accessible. Similarly, those interested in behavioral analysis will benefit from exploring the cheapest bcba online program options, which provide an affordable route toward meaningful certification.

These online degrees make it easier than ever to pursue a rewarding career in social sciences and humanities, no matter where you are located or what your current commitments may be.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin M. Gray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles