World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
15894
World Ranking
7003
National Ranking
56

Alois Schlögl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alois Schlögl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 102 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alois Schlögl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alois Schlögl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alois Schlögl is affiliated with the Institute of Science and Technology Austria in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with significant contributions in both Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. In addition, their work intersects with Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ecology, and Plant Science subfields.

The scientist's research covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Plant Virus Research Studies

Among the frequent coauthors collaborating with Alois Schlögl are Xiaomin Zhang, Péter Jónás, David Vandael, Julia Datler, and Jesse M. Hansen.

The scientist has published articles across multiple venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Computational Science
  • Neuron
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Selected recent papers by Alois Schlögl include:

  • "Selective Routing of Spatial Information Flow from Input to Output in Hippocampal Granule Cells" (2020), published in Neuron
  • "How connectivity rules and synaptic properties shape the efficacy of pattern separation in the entorhinal cortex-dentate gyrus-CA3 network" (2021), published in Nature Computational Science
  • "MOD: A novel machine-learning optimal-filtering method for accurate and efficient detection of subthreshold synaptic events in vivo" (2021), published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • "The History and Challenges of SCP-ECG: The Standard Communication Protocol for Computer-Assisted Electrocardiography" (2021), published in Hearts
  • "Multi-modal cryo-EM reveals trimers of protein A10 to form the palisade layer in poxvirus cores" (2024), published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks

    Gert Pfurtscheller;Clemens Brunner;Alois Schlögl;F. H. Lopes da Silva

  • Review of the BCI Competition IV

    Michael Tangermann;Klaus Robert Müller;Ad Aertsen;Niels Birbaumer

  • The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems

    B. Blankertz;K.-R. Muller;D.J. Krusienski;G. Schalk

  • The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials

    B. Blankertz;K.-R. Muller;G. Curio;T.M. Vaughan

  • Separability of EEG signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters

    G. Pfurtscheller;C. Neuper;A. Schlogl;K. Lugger

  • Current trends in Graz brain-computer interface (BCI) research

    G. Pfurtscheller;C. Neuper;C. Guger;W. Harkam

  • A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings.

    Alois Schlögl;Claudia Keinrath;Doris Zimmermann;Reinhold Scherer

  • Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems.

    Guido Nolte;Andreas Ziehe;Vadim V. Nikulin;Alois Schlögl

  • Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005.

    Alois Schlögl;Felix Yuan-Tseng Lee;Horst Bischof;Gert Pfurtscheller

  • Rapid prototyping of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)

    C. Guger;A. Schlogl;C. Neuper;D. Walterspacher

  • Graz-BCI: state of the art and clinical applications

    G. Pfurtscheller;C. Neuper;G.R. Muller;B. Obermaier

  • 2009 Special Issue: Time Domain Parameters as a feature for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces

    Carmen Vidaurre;Nicole Krämer;Benjamin Blankertz;Alois Schlögl

  • An E-health solution for automatic sleep classification according to Rechtschaffen and Kales: validation study of the Somnolyzer 24 x 7 utilizing the Siesta database.

    Peter Anderer;Georg Gruber;Silvia Parapatics;Michael Woertz

  • Enhancement of left-right sensorimotor EEG differences during feedback-regulated motor imagery.

    Christa Neuper;Alois Schlögl;Gert Pfurtscheller

  • BCI meeting 2005-workshop on BCI signal processing: feature extraction and translation

    D.J. McFarland;C.W. Anderson;K.-R. Muller;A. Schlogl

  • Synaptic mechanisms of pattern completion in the hippocampal CA3 network

    Segundo Jose Guzman;Alois Schlögl;Michael Frotscher;Peter Jonas

  • Toward Self-Paced Brain–Computer Communication: Navigation Through Virtual Worlds

    R. Scherer;F. Lee;A. Schlogl;R. Leeb

  • BioSig: The Free and Open Source Software Library for Biomedical Signal Processing

    Carmen Vidaurre;Tilmann Heinrich Sander;Alois Schlögl

  • A fully on-line adaptive BCI

    C. Vidaurre;A. Schlogl;R. Cabeza;R. Scherer

  • The SIESTA project polygraphic and clinical database

    G. Klosh;B. Kemp;T. Penzel;A. Schlogl

  • 15 years of BCI research at graz university of technology: current projects

    G. Pfurtscheller;G.R. Muller-Putz;A. Schlogl;B. Graimann

Frequent Co-Authors

Gert Pfurtscheller
Gert Pfurtscheller Graz University of Technology
Reinhold Scherer
Reinhold Scherer University of Essex
Carmen Vidaurre
Carmen Vidaurre Technical University of Berlin
Peter Anderer
Peter Anderer Philips (Finland)
Peter Rappelsberger
Peter Rappelsberger University of Vienna
Clemens Brunner
Clemens Brunner University of Graz
Robert Leeb
Robert Leeb MindMaze
Stephen J. Roberts
Stephen J. Roberts University of Oxford
Gernot R. Müller-Putz
Gernot R. Müller-Putz Graz University of Technology
Peter Jonas
Peter Jonas Institute of Science and Technology Austria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and future career paths. For those seeking a quick start, an online associate degree can provide foundational knowledge and technical skills within as little as six months. This is a flexible entry point into tech careers or for further academic pursuit.

Cost is a major concern for many students. If you are considering a business track, check out options that focus on online business degree cost to find programs that fit your budget. Similarly, you can graduate with less debt by researching the least expensive online bachelor's degree programs across the country.

Aspiring engineers can benefit greatly from remote learning. There are numerous reputable online colleges for engineering that offer flexible schedules and affordable tuition, making it easier than ever to launch an engineering career.

By comparing these pathways, students can choose the degree and career that match their goals, timeline, and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Alois Schlögl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles