World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12572 11831 133 125 766 33222

Jacob Rosenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacob Rosenberg between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacob Rosenberg published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 26.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 77 publications in 2015. 76 of the 1,002 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 77. Peak 77 publications in 2015. 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 44 publications 2013: 71 publications 2014: 71 publications 2015: 77 publications 2016: 62 publications 2017: 51 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 77 publications 2024: 51 publications 2025: 74 publications 2026: 2 publications
1989 2026

1,002 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacob Rosenberg: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 3
1990 5
1991 2
1992 5
1993 0
1994 9
1995 3
1996 5
1997 5
1998 3
1999 9
2000 5
2001 8
2002 9
2003 6
2004 17
2005 25
2006 7
2007 15
2008 23
2009 31
2010 32
2011 36
2012 44
2013 71
2014 71
2015 77
2016 62
2017 51
2018 30
2019 26
2020 38
2021 35
2022 30
2023 77
2024 51
2025 74
2026 2
Total 1,002
Download as CSV

Jacob Rosenberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 766 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 766
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jacob Rosenberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jacob Rosenberg is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly within the field of surgery. Their scholarly output includes a significant number of publications spanning medicine and various subfields related to surgical practice and oncology.

The scientist's main field of study is Medicine, with 580 publications. Their work is further specialized in subfields such as Surgery (345 publications), Oncology (52 publications), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (33 publications), Emergency Medicine (29 publications), and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (22 publications).

Rosenberg's research focuses on topics connected to surgical treatment and cancer care, including:

  • Hernia repair and management
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

The scientist has published papers in a range of journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Hernia
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Laparoscopic Surgery
  • Ugeskrift for Læger

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Jacob Rosenberg are:

  • "Melatonin for preoperative and postoperative anxiety in adults" (2020), published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Five-Factor Prognostic Model for Survival of Post-Platinum Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving PD-L1 Inhibitors" (2020), published in The Journal of Urology
  • "Low anterior resection syndrome in a Scandinavian population of patients with rectal cancer: a longitudinal follow-up within the QoLiRECT study" (2020), published in Colorectal Disease
  • "Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial" (2020), published in British Journal of Surgery
  • "Methods of Colostomy Construction: No Effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate" (2020), published in Annals of Surgery

Frequent collaborators in Rosenberg's research include Siv Fonnes, Kristoffer Andresen, Jason Joe Baker, Stina Öberg, and Anders Gram-Hanssen.

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

    H. Jaap Bonjer;Charlotte L. Deijen;Gabor A. Abis;Miguel A. Cuesta

  • Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

    T P Grantcharov;T P Grantcharov;V B Kristiansen;J Bendix;L Bardram

  • Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]

    R. Bittner;M. E. Arregui;T. Bisgaard;M. Dudai

  • Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Thue Bisgaard;Birthe Klarskov;Jacob Rosenberg;Henrik Kehlet

  • Complications of ERCP: a prospective study

    Merete Christensen;Peter Matzen;Svend Schulze;Jacob Rosenberg

  • Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study.

    Linda Basse;Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen;Linda Bardram;Per Billesbølle

  • Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition

    L Basse;H H Raskov;D Hjort Jakobsen;E Sonne

  • Preoperative dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

    Thue Bisgaard;Birthe Klarskov;Henrik Kehlet;Jacob Rosenberg

  • The Safety of Melatonin in Humans

    Lars Peter Holst Andersen;Ismayil Gögenür;Jacob Rosenberg;Russel J Reiter

  • Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery.

    Teodor P. Grantcharov;Jacob Rosenberg

  • Update of Guidelines on Laparoscopic (TAPP) and Endoscopic (TEP) Treatment of Inguinal Hernia (International Endohernia Society)

    R. Bittner;M. A. Montgomery;E. Arregui;V. Bansal

  • Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

    Teodor P Grantcharov;Linda Bardram;Peter Funch-Jensen;Jacob Rosenberg

  • Laparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: Prospective study

    Teodor P. Grantcharov;Linda Bardram;Peter Funch-Jensen;Jacob Rosenberg

  • Effect of preoperative abstinence on poor postoperative outcome in alcohol misusers: randomised controlled trial

    Hanne Tønnesen;Jacob Rosenberg;Hans J Nielsen;Verner Rasmussen

  • Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Thue Bisgaard;Henrik Kehlet;Jacob Rosenberg

  • Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy.

    T. P. Grantcharov;T. P. Grantcharov;L. Bardram;P. Funch-Jensen;J. Rosenberg

  • Postoperative sleep disturbances: mechanisms and clinical implications.

    S Rosenberg-Adamsen;H Kehlet;C Dodds;J Rosenberg

  • Clinical pharmacokinetics of melatonin: a systematic review.

    Nathja Groth Harpsøe;Lars Peter Holst Andersen;Ismail Gögenur;Jacob Rosenberg

  • PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN BY BALANCED ANALGESIA

    J.B. Dahl;J. Rosenberg;W.E. Dirkes;T. Mogensen

  • Laparoscopic Lavage Is Feasible and Safe for the Treatment of Perforated Diverticulitis With Purulent Peritonitis: The First Results From the Randomized Controlled Trial DILALA.

    Eva Angenete;Anders Thornell;Anders Thornell;Jakob Burcharth;Jakob Burcharth;Hans Christian Pommergaard;Hans Christian Pommergaard

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik Kehlet
Henrik Kehlet Copenhagen University Hospital
Lars S. Rasmussen
Lars S. Rasmussen University of Copenhagen
Jens Lykkesfeldt
Jens Lykkesfeldt University of Copenhagen
Russel J. Reiter
Russel J. Reiter The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Henrik S. Thomsen
Henrik S. Thomsen Copenhagen University Hospital
Jeffrey M. Drazen
Jeffrey M. Drazen Harvard University
Morten Møller
Morten Møller University of Copenhagen
Paul C. Hébert
Paul C. Hébert University of Alberta
Peter W. de Leeuw
Peter W. de Leeuw Maastricht University
Peter Lange
Peter Lange University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related healthcare degrees can expand your career opportunities beyond traditional medicine. Many students consider ADN nursing programs, which offer a faster route to becoming a registered nurse and can be more accessible than standard bachelor’s programs.

If nursing isn’t your first choice or you prefer administrative roles, healthcare management is another excellent option. Accredited online programs are available, including the health care administration degree, which prepares you for leadership positions within hospitals, clinics, or insurance companies.

There are flexible entry options, too. You might want to look for a nursing school that does not require TEAS test, which can help you avoid additional standardized testing during the application process.

For those interested in technical roles, consider the growing field of medical records and billing. Learn more about accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to start a vital position supporting patient care and hospital operations.

Best Scientists Citing Jacob Rosenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles