World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
9493
World Ranking
4080
National Ranking
268

William E. Piper publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Piper sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 219 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William E. Piper D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Piper sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William E. Piper is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on psychology and computer science. The scientist has contributed notably to both domains, incorporating subfields such as clinical psychology, social psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and computer networks and communications.

Their research topics demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach, bridging technology and psychological sciences. Key research themes include augmented reality applications, digital transformation in industry, IoT and edge/fog computing, psychotherapy techniques and applications, psychology coaching and therapy, as well as psychological testing and assessment.

William E. Piper's published works include:

  • Digital Twins for Smart Cities: Case Study and Visualisation via Mixed Reality (2022), published in the 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall)
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy (2025), published in the International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

The scientist often collaborates with a range of co-authors, including Hongjian Sun, Jing Jiang, Harold S. Bernard, Gary M. Burlingame, and Phillip Flores. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary efforts reflecting their cross-domain research interests.

William E. Piper has published in the following notable venues:

  • 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall)
  • International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

In recognition of contributions to their field, William E. Piper was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • DO THERAPISTS VARY MUCH IN THEIR SUCCESS?. Findings from Four Outcome Studies

    Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph;A. Thomas McLellan;George Woody

  • Transference interpretations, therapeutic alliance, and outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy.

    William E. Piper;Hassan F. A. Azim;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCallum

  • Strategies for Reducing Patient-Initiated Premature Termination of Psychotherapy

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce;William E. Piper

  • Effect of alexithymia on the process and outcome of psychotherapy: a programmatic review.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce

  • Prediction of dropping out in time-limited, interpretive individual psychotherapy.

    William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCallum

  • Patient personality and time-limited group psychotherapy for complicated grief.

    William E. Piper;Mary McCallum;Anthony S. Joyce;John S. Rosie

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy

    Harold Bernard;Gary Burlingame;Phillip Flores;Les Greene

  • Expectancy, the therapeutic alliance, and treatment outcome in short-term individual psychotherapy.

    Anthony S. Joyce;William E. Piper

  • Quality of object relations versus interpersonal functioning as predictors of therapeutic alliance and psychotherapy outcome.

    William E. Piper;Hassan F. A. Azim;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCALLUM

  • Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups

    Unknown

  • The alliance as mediator of expectancy effects in short-term individual therapy.

    Anthony S. Joyce;John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Mary McCallum

  • Therapeutic Alliance and Cohesion Variables as Predictors of Outcome in Short–Term Group Psychotherapy

    Anthony S. Joyce;William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk

  • Relationships among psychological mindedness, alexithymia and outcome in four forms of short-term psychotherapy

    Mary McCallum;William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce

  • The Quality of Object Relations Scale.

    Hassan F. Azim;William E. Piper;Perry M. Segal;George W. Nixon

  • Interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables.

    William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCallum;Hassan F. Azim

  • Interpersonal problems associated with narcissism among psychiatric outpatients.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce;Paul I. Steinberg

  • The effect of group climate on outcome in two forms of short-term group therapy.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper

  • The negative effect of alexithymia on the outcome of group therapy for complicated grief: what role might the therapist play?

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce

  • Prevalence of loss and complicated grief among psychiatric outpatients.

    William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Hassan F. Azim;Rene Weideman

  • Transference interpretations in short-term dynamic psychotherapy.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCALLUM

  • Group Composition and Group Therapy for Complicated Grief.

    William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce;Rene Weideman

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony S. Joyce
Anthony S. Joyce University of Alberta
John S. Ogrodniczuk
John S. Ogrodniczuk University of British Columbia
Giovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg Harvard University
David Mischoulon
David Mischoulon Harvard University
Maurizio Fava
Maurizio Fava Harvard University
Steven C. Hayes
Steven C. Hayes University of Nevada Reno
Robert A. Schoevers
Robert A. Schoevers University Medical Center Groningen
Silvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi University of Bologna
Josie Geller
Josie Geller University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens pathways to a variety of rewarding careers, many of which can be pursued through online degrees. One such pathway is becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP), a field that combines psychology, communication sciences, and clinical practice. Online programs can help prepare you with the foundational knowledge needed to meet certification and licensing requirements, which vary by state.

If you're interested in becoming an SLP, it's important to understand state-specific guidelines. For example, you can review the slp requirements in Idaho and compare them with other states to see what fits your career goals best.

Additional resources for those considering SLP careers include detailed guides on becoming a speech therapist in Illinois, slp requirements in Indiana, and slp requirements in Iowa.

Whether you choose to specialize in speech-language pathology or another branch of psychology, online degrees offer flexible options to launch your professional journey in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Piper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles