World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Per Høglend

Per Høglend

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9890 9257 93 89 113 4938

Per Høglend publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Per Høglend between 1988 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Per Høglend published across 35 years, from 1988 to 2022, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2011. 5 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2011. 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications
1988 2022

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Per Høglend: publications per year, 1988 to 2022
Year Publications
1988 3
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 6
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 4
2003 3
2004 6
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 3
2011 7
2012 5
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 4
2017 6
2018 4
2019 4
2020 6
2021 3
2022 2
Total 113
Download as CSV

Per Høglend publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Høglend sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 113
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Per Høglend D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Høglend sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Per Høglend is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway and has a research focus primarily within psychology, with an emphasis on clinical psychology. Their scholarly contributions span a range of topics related to psychotherapy, personality disorders, and psychological assessment.

The principal fields of study associated with this researcher include:

  • Psychology

More specifically, their work involves the following subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics explored in their publications cover:

  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Recent published papers reflect these research interests. Notable works include:

  • "Investigating the dose-response effect in open-ended psychotherapy" (2020), published in Psychotherapy Research
  • "The first experimental study of transference work-in teenagers (FEST-IT): a multicentre, observer- and patient-blind, randomised controlled component study" (2021), published in BMC Psychiatry
  • "Patient factors predict therapists' emotional countertransference differently depending on whether therapists use transference work in psychodynamic therapy" (2020), published in Psychotherapy Research
  • "Parental Bonding and Relationships with Friends and Siblings in Adolescents with Depression" (2022), published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Therapeutic Atmosphere in Psychotherapy Sessions" (2020), also published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Frequent publication venues for this scholar include:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Healthcare
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment

The researcher has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, with multiple publications alongside:

  • Randi Ulberg
  • Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl
  • Magnus Nordmo
  • Jon T. Monsen
  • Ole André Solbakken

Best Publications

  • Quality of working alliance in psychotherapy: therapist variables and patient/therapist similarity as predictors.

    Anne Grete Hersoug;Per Høglend;Jon T. Monsen;Odd E. Havik

  • Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: an experimental study of transference interpretations.

    Per Høglend;Svein Amlo;Alice Marble;Kjell-Petter Bøgwald

  • Transference Interpretations in Dynamic Psychotherapy: Do They Really Yield Sustained Effects?

    Per Høglend;Kjell-Petter Bøgwald;Svein Amlo;Alice Marble

  • Love yourself as a person, doubt yourself as a therapist?

    Helene A. Nissen‐Lie;Michael Helge Rønnestad;Per A. Høglend;Odd E. Havik

  • Quality of Early Working Alliance in Psychotherapy: Diagnoses, Relationship and Intrapsychic Variables as Predictors

    Anne Grete Hersoug;Jon T. Monsen;Odd E. Havik;Per Høglend

  • Therapist characteristics influencing the quality of alliance in long‐term psychotherapy

    Anne Grete Hersoug;Per Høglend;Odd Havik;Anna von der Lippe

  • The Contribution of the Quality of Therapists' Personal Lives to the Development of the Working Alliance

    Helene A. Nissen-Lie;Odd E. Havik;Per A. Høglend;Jon T. Monsen

  • Identifying mechanisms of change in psychotherapy: Mediators of treatment outcome

    Paul Johansson;Per Høglend

  • The mediating role of insight for long-term improvements in psychodynamic therapy.

    Paul Johansson;Per Høglend;Randi Ulberg;Svein Amlo

  • Defensive functioning predicts improvement in major depressive episodes.

    P Høglend;J C Perry

  • Effects of transference work in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations.

    Per Høglend;Anne Grete Hersoug;Kjell-Petter Bøgwald;Svein Amlo

  • Assessment of change in dynamic psychotherapy.

    Per Høglend;Kjell-Petter Bøgwald;Svein Amlo;Oscar Heyerdahl

  • Exploration of the patient-therapist relationship in psychotherapy.

    Per Høglend

  • Contribution of defensive functioning to the quality of working alliance and psychotherapy outcome.

    Anne Grete Hersoug;Harold C. Sexton;Per Høglend

  • Comparison of short- and long-term dynamic group psychotherapy: randomised clinical trial

    Steinar Lorentzen;Torleif Ruud;Anette Fjeldstad;Per Høglend

  • Mentalization as a moderator of treatment effects: Findings from a randomized clinical trial for personality disorders

    Frida Slagstad Gullestad;Merete Selsbakk Johansen;Per Høglend;Sigmund Karterud

  • Countertransference feelings in one year of individual therapy: an evaluation of the factor structure in the Feeling Word Checklist-58.

    Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl;Jan Ivar Røssberg;Kjell Petter Bøgwald;Glen O. Gabbard

  • Transference interpretations and long-term change after dynamic psychotherapy of brief to moderate length.

    Per Høglend

  • Pretreatment patient characteristics related to the level and development of working alliance in long-term psychotherapy

    Hersoug Ag;Høglend P;Havik Oe;von der Lippe A

  • Therapeutic alliance, cohesion and outcome in a long-term analytic group. A preliminary study.

    Steinar Lorentzen;Harold C. Sexton;Per Høglend

  • Patient and therapist perspectives on alliance development: therapists' practice experiences as predictors.

    Helene A. Nissen-Lie;Odd E. Havik;Per A. Høglend;Michael Helge Rønnestad

Frequent Co-Authors

Steinar Lorentzen
Steinar Lorentzen University of Oslo
Odd E. Havik
Odd E. Havik University of Bergen
Glen O. Gabbard
Glen O. Gabbard Baylor College of Medicine
Theresa Wilberg
Theresa Wilberg Oslo University Hospital
Paul Crits-Christoph
Paul Crits-Christoph University of Pennsylvania
J. Christopher Perry
J. Christopher Perry McGill University
Tore C. Stiles
Tore C. Stiles Norwegian University of Science and Technology
William E. Piper
William E. Piper University of British Columbia
Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski
Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski University of Oslo
Giovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of career paths, especially in areas like counseling and behavioral health. Many students choose to specialize in substance abuse counseling, which is in high demand across the United States. Online psychology degrees are a flexible way to get started, and can help you meet the diverse education requirements needed for certification in this field.

Each state and city establishes its own rules for becoming a substance abuse counselor. For example, you can explore New Orleans substance abuse counselor certification requirements to learn about local licensing processes. In other areas, there are detailed substance abuse counselor requirements in New York City, addressing education and supervised experience.

For those considering work in New Jersey, it’s helpful to review how to become a substance abuse counselor in Newark. Similarly, prospective counselors in Virginia should learn about Norfolk substance abuse counselors education requirements.

Exploring these online degree and career resources can help guide your educational choices and better prepare you for a meaningful role in the psychology workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Per Høglend

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles