World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
12277
World Ranking
3717
National Ranking
242

John S. Ogrodniczuk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Ogrodniczuk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 356 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John S. Ogrodniczuk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Ogrodniczuk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John S. Ogrodniczuk is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a strong focus on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Applied Psychology.

Their research concentrates on several themes including Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications, Suicide and Self-Harm Studies, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development.

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • "Men's Dropout From Mental Health Services: Results From a Survey of Australian Men Across the Life Span" (2021) in American Journal of Men s Health
  • "Men's Help-Seeking for Depression: Attitudinal and Structural Barriers in Symptomatic Men" (2020) in Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
  • "Psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of online help-seeking Canadian men" (2021) in Postgraduate Medicine
  • "Male-Type and Prototypal Depression Trajectories for Men Experiencing Mental Health Problems" (2020) in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Challenges working with men: Australian therapists' perspectives" (2021) in Journal of Clinical Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • David Kealy
  • Simon Rice
  • Zac E. Seidler
  • John L. Oliffe

Publications by this scientist often appear in several venues, notably:

  • American Journal of Men s Health
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
  • Psychology of Men & Masculinity
  • The Journal of Men s Studies
  • Current Psychology

Best Publications

  • Comparative efficacy, speed, and adverse effects of three PTSD treatments: Exposure therapy, EMDR, and relaxation training.

    Steven Taylor;Dana S. Thordarson;Louise Maxfield;Ingrid C. Fedoroff

  • Strategies for Reducing Patient-Initiated Premature Termination of Psychotherapy

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce;William E. Piper

  • Effect of alexithymia on the process and outcome of psychotherapy: a programmatic review.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce

  • Men's discourses of help-seeking in the context of depression.

    Joy L. Johnson;John L. Oliffe;Mary T. Kelly;Paul Galdas

  • Prediction of dropping out in time-limited, interpretive individual psychotherapy.

    William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCallum

  • Patient personality and time-limited group psychotherapy for complicated grief.

    William E. Piper;Mary McCallum;Anthony S. Joyce;John S. Rosie

  • “You feel like you can’t live anymore”: Suicide from the perspectives of Canadian men who experience depression

    John L. Oliffe;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Joan L. Bottorff;Joy L. Johnson

  • The alliance as mediator of expectancy effects in short-term individual therapy.

    Anthony S. Joyce;John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Mary McCallum

  • Engaging Men in Psychological Treatment: A Scoping Review.

    Zac E Seidler;Simon M Rice;John S Ogrodniczuk;John L Oliffe

  • Changes in alexithymia following psychological intervention: a review.

    Kristjana Cameron;John Ogrodniczuk;George Hadjipavlou

  • Therapeutic Alliance and Cohesion Variables as Predictors of Outcome in Short–Term Group Psychotherapy

    Anthony S. Joyce;William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk

  • Relationships among psychological mindedness, alexithymia and outcome in four forms of short-term psychotherapy

    Mary McCallum;William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Anthony S. Joyce

  • Stigma in male depression and suicide: A Canadian sex comparison study.

    John L. Oliffe;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Susan J. Gordon;Genevieve Creighton

  • Interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables.

    William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCallum;Hassan F. Azim

  • Men’s Depression and Suicide

    John L Oliffe;Emma Rossnagel;Zac E Seidler;David Kealy

  • Interpersonal problems associated with narcissism among psychiatric outpatients.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce;Paul I. Steinberg

  • The effect of group climate on outcome in two forms of short-term group therapy.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper

  • The negative effect of alexithymia on the outcome of group therapy for complicated grief: what role might the therapist play?

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce

  • Connecting humor, health, and masculinities at prostate cancer support groups.

    John L. Oliffe;John Ogrodniczuk;Joan Lorraine Bottorff;T. Gregory Hislop

  • Prevalence of loss and complicated grief among psychiatric outpatients.

    William E. Piper;John S. Ogrodniczuk;Hassan F. Azim;Rene Weideman

  • Transference interpretations in short-term dynamic psychotherapy.

    John S. Ogrodniczuk;William E. Piper;Anthony S. Joyce;Mary McCALLUM

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony S. Joyce
Anthony S. Joyce University of Alberta
William E. Piper
William E. Piper University of British Columbia
John L. Oliffe
John L. Oliffe University of British Columbia
Simon M Rice
Simon M Rice University of Melbourne
Joan L. Bottorff
Joan L. Bottorff University of British Columbia
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
Joy L. Johnson
Joy L. Johnson Simon Fraser University
Alex Broom
Alex Broom University of Sydney
Giovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, particularly in mental health counseling. Many students consider becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) to support and guide individuals through life’s challenges. For those interested in online degrees or flexible study options, it's important to understand that professional licensure requirements vary significantly by state.

For example, those researching lpc licensure requirements in Washington will find specific educational and clinical experience prerequisites unique to that state. Similarly, West Virginia lpc licensure requirements detail unique coursework and exam expectations.

Students seeking licensure in the Midwest should review lpc licensure requirements in Wisconsin, as requirements can differ from neighboring states. Additionally, those interested in more rural settings may explore lpc license requirements in Wyoming to learn about requirements for serving these communities.

It’s essential to align your educational path with the specific licensure requirements in your desired area of practice. Careful planning ensures eligibility for licensure and better career prospects after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Ogrodniczuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles