World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 65 3120 2851 1456 1311 193 15036

Linda J. Richards publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda J. Richards between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda J. Richards published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 7 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda J. Richards: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 5
2001 5
2002 2
2003 7
2004 3
2005 7
2006 5
2007 4
2008 5
2009 9
2010 8
2011 10
2012 7
2013 6
2014 13
2015 12
2016 10
2017 14
2018 11
2019 9
2020 16
2021 13
2022 7
2023 7
2024 3
2025 6
2026 1
Total 221
Download as CSV

Linda J. Richards publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda J. Richards sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 193 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302 193
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda J. Richards D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda J. Richards sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 65
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda J. Richards is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research predominantly spans fields such as Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience.

Their work has a strong interdisciplinary focus, integrating several subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Molecular Biology; Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging; and Genetics.

The main topics of research covered by Richards include:

  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • RNA Research and Splicing

Recent publications by Linda J. Richards showcase the diversity of research interests and venues of contribution. Notable papers include:

  • Pathogenic DDX3X Mutations Impair RNA Metabolism and Neurogenesis during Fetal Cortical Development, 2020, Neuron
  • International Brain Initiative: An Innovative Framework for Coordinated Global Brain Research Efforts, 2020, Neuron
  • Understanding the Uptake of Nanomedicines at Different Stages of Brain Cancer Using a Modular Nanocarrier Platform and Precision Bispecific Antibodies, 2020, ACS Central Science
  • Differential timing of a conserved transcriptional network underlies divergent cortical projection routes across mammalian brain evolution, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The evolution, formation and connectivity of the anterior commissure, 2021, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Frequent co-authors in Richards's work include Rodrigo Suárez, Laura R. Fenlon, Jens Bunt, Elliott H. Sherr, and Jonathan W. C. Lim, indicating collaborations likely spanning various aspects of biomedical research and neuroscience.

Their publication history also demonstrates frequent contributions to specific venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuron
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cortex
  • eLife

This profile shows a scientific career characterized by significant interdisciplinary work focused on neurological disorders and molecular neuroscience, utilizing advanced imaging and molecular techniques to further understanding in these areas.

Best Publications

  • Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity

    Lynn K. Paul;Warren S. Brown;Ralph Adolphs;J. Michael Tyszka

  • Neuropilin-1 Conveys Semaphorin and VEGF Signaling during Neural and Cardiovascular Development

    Chenghua Gu;E. Rene Rodriguez;Dorothy V. Reimert;Tianzhi Shu

  • De novo generation of neuronal cells from the adult mouse brain.

    L J Richards;T J Kilpatrick;P F Bartlett

  • White and gray matter development in human fetal, newborn and pediatric brains.

    Hao Huang;Jiangyang Zhang;Setsu Wakana;Setsu Wakana;Weihong Zhang;Weihong Zhang

  • Anatomical Characterization of Human Fetal Brain Development with Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Hao Huang;Rong Xue;Jiangyang Zhang;Tianbo Ren

  • Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes

    Timothy J. Edwards;Timothy J. Edwards;Elliott H. Sherr;A. James Barkovich;A. James Barkovich;Linda J. Richards

  • The Transcription Factor Gene Nfib Is Essential for both Lung Maturation and Brain Development

    George Steele-Perkins;Céline Plachez;Kenneth G. Butz;Guanhu Yang

  • Labeling Neural Cells Using Adenoviral Gene Transfer of Membrane-Targeted GFP

    Koki Moriyoshi;Linda J Richards;Chihiro Akazawa;Dennis D.M O'Leary

  • Pharmacogenetic stimulation of neuronal activity increases myelination in an axon-specific manner

    Stanislaw Mitew;Ilan Gobius;Laura R. Fenlon;Stuart J. McDougall

  • Cortical Axon Guidance by the Glial Wedge during the Development of the Corpus Callosum

    Tianzhi Shu;Linda J. Richards

  • Robo1 regulates the development of major axon tracts and interneuron migration in the forebrain.

    William Andrews;Anastasia Liapi;Céline Plachez;Laura Camurri

  • A new chemotaxis assay shows the extreme sensitivity of axons to molecular gradients.

    William J Rosoff;Jeffrey S Urbach;Mark A Esrick;Ryan G McAllister

  • Mechanisms regulating the development of the corpus callosum and its agenesis in mouse and human

    LJ Richards;C Plachez;T Ren

  • Abnormal Development of Forebrain Midline Glia and Commissural Projections in Nfia Knock-Out Mice

    Tianzhi Shu;Kenneth G. Butz;Celine Plachez;Richard M. Gronostajski

  • Growth cone chemotaxis

    Duncan Mortimer;Thomas Fothergill;Zac Pujic;Linda J. Richards

  • Pathogenic DDX3X Mutations Impair RNA Metabolism and Neurogenesis during Fetal Cortical Development

    Ashley L. Lennox;Mariah L. Hoye;Ruiji Jiang;Bethany L. Johnson-Kerner

  • The transcription factor Nfix is essential for normal brain development

    Christine E Campbell;Michael Piper;Céline Plachez;Yu-Ting Yeh

  • Directed Growth of Early Cortical Axons Is Influenced by a Chemoattractant Released from an Intermediate Target

    Linda J. Richards;Susan E. Koester;Rebecca Tuttle;Dennis D. M. O’Leary

  • Wiring the Brain: The Biology of Neuronal Guidance

    Alain Chédotal;Linda J. Richards

  • Three-dimensional anatomical characterization of the developing mouse brain by diffusion tensor microimaging.

    Jiangyang Zhang;Linda J Richards;Paul Yarowsky;Hao Huang

  • A role for cingulate pioneering axons in the development of the corpus callosum

    Brian G. Rash;Linda J. Richards

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Gronostajski
Richard M. Gronostajski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Susumu Mori
Susumu Mori Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Paul J. Lockhart
Paul J. Lockhart Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Perry F. Bartlett
Perry F. Bartlett University of Queensland
Geoffrey J. Goodhill
Geoffrey J. Goodhill Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew W. Boyd
Andrew W. Boyd University of Queensland
Timothy L. Bailey
Timothy L. Bailey University of Nevada Reno
Peter C.M. van Zijl
Peter C.M. van Zijl Kennedy Krieger Institute
Paul Yarowsky
Paul Yarowsky University of Maryland, Baltimore
William B. Dobyns
William B. Dobyns University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to many careers in healthcare and mental health. For those interested in working directly with individuals, various online degrees can help build a rewarding career. For example, becoming a school counselor is a popular option—programs like the university of the cumberlands school counseling program are tailored for those who want to support students and foster healthy learning environments.

The costs of further education are an important factor to consider. If you're researching advanced degrees in mental health, you might want to compare a masters in counseling online cost to find a program that fits your budget without sacrificing quality.

Other fulfilling career pathways include becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist. There are flexible, accredited programs available specifically if you’re seeking a marriage and family therapist degree.

For those who wish to explore broader roles in psychology, pursuing a masters in psychology online can equip you with a strong foundation for diverse career opportunities, both clinical and research-oriented.

Best Scientists Citing Linda J. Richards

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles