World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5149
World Ranking
9018
National Ranking
3809

Paul Yarowsky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Yarowsky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul Yarowsky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Yarowsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Yarowsky is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their research primarily spans medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with notable subfield concentrations in surgery, molecular biology, and orthopedics and sports medicine.

The main topics covered in Yarowsky's work include extracellular vesicles in disease, knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, sports injuries and prevention, and tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Recent publications by Yarowsky include the following papers:

  • Exosomes Isolated From Platelet-Rich Plasma and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Recovery of Function After Muscle Injury (2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine)
  • Exosomes Isolated From Platelet-rich Plasma And Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Functional Recovery After Muscle Injury (2020, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise)

Frequent co-authors in Yarowsky's publications are:

  • Shama R. Iyer
  • Amanda L. Scheiber
  • R. Frank Henn
  • Satoru Otsuru
  • Richard M. Lovering

The primary publication venues where Yarowsky's work appears include:

  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Best Publications

  • White and gray matter development in human fetal, newborn and pediatric brains.

    Hao Huang;Jiangyang Zhang;Setsu Wakana;Setsu Wakana;Weihong Zhang;Weihong Zhang

  • Anatomical Characterization of Human Fetal Brain Development with Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Hao Huang;Rong Xue;Jiangyang Zhang;Tianbo Ren

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of the developing mouse brain

    Susumu Mori;Susumu Mori;Ryuta Itoh;Ryuta Itoh;Jiangyang Zhang;Walter E. Kaufmann

  • Astrocytosis and axonal proliferation in the hippocampus of S100b transgenic mice.

    Roger H. Reeves;Jibin Yao;Michael R. Crowley;Michael R. Crowley;Suzanne Buck

  • Three-dimensional anatomical characterization of the developing mouse brain by diffusion tensor microimaging.

    Jiangyang Zhang;Linda J Richards;Paul Yarowsky;Hao Huang

  • Physiological roles of the sodium-calcium exchanger in nerve and muscle.

    Mordecai P. Blaustein;William F. Goldman;Giovanni Fontana;Bruce K. Krueger

  • Fluoxetine rescues deficient neurogenesis in hippocampus of the Ts65Dn mouse model for Down syndrome

    Sarah Clark;Jennifer Schwalbe;Melissa R. Stasko;Paul J. Yarowsky

  • Sodium/calcium exchange in rat cortical astrocytes

    WF Goldman;PJ Yarowsky;M Juhaszova;BK Krueger

  • Spatial memory deficits in segmental trisomic Ts65Dn mice

    Gregory E. Demas;Randy J. Nelson;Bruce K. Krueger;Paul J. Yarowsky

  • Calcium‐dependent potentials in the mammalian sympathetic neurone.

    Unknown

  • Mutually exclusive exon splicing of type III brain sodium channel alpha subunit RNA generates developmentally regulated isoforms in rat brain.

    T A Gustafson;E C Clevinger;T J O'Neill;P J Yarowsky

  • Frequency-dependent activation of glucose utilization in the superior cervical ganglion by electrical stimulation of cervical sympathetic trunk

    Paul Yarowsky;Massako Kadekaro;Louis Sokoloff

  • Role of Founder Cell Deficit and Delayed Neuronogenesis in Microencephaly of the Trisomy 16 Mouse

    Tarik F. Haydar;Richard S. Nowakowski;Paul J. Yarowsky;Bruce K. Krueger

  • Impaired spatial working and reference memory in segmental trisomy (Ts65Dn) mice

    Gregory E Demas;Randy J Nelson;Bruce K Krueger;Paul J Yarowsky

  • Detection of amyloid plaques in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease by magnetic resonance imaging.

    Jiangyang Zhang;Paul Yarowsky;Marcia N. Gordon;Giovanni Di Carlo

  • Modulation of two functionally distinct Ca2+ stores in astrocytes: role of the plasmalemmal Na/Ca exchanger.

    Vera A. Golovina;Linda L. Bambrick;Paul J. Yarowsky;Bruce K. Krueger

  • Glutamate as a hippocampal neuron survival factor: an inherited defect in the trisomy 16 mouse.

    Linda L. Bambrick;Paul J. Yarowsky;Bruce K. Krueger

  • Mapping postnatal mouse brain development with diffusion tensor microimaging.

    Jiangyang Zhang;Michael I. Miller;Celine Plachez;Linda J. Richards

  • Consequences of Trisomy 16 for Mouse Brain Development: Corticogenesis in a Model of Down Syndrome

    Tarik F. Haydar;Mary E. Blue;Mark E. Molliver;Bruce K. Krueger

  • Spatiotemporal maturation patterns of murine brain quantified by diffusion tensor MRI and deformation-based morphometry

    Ragini Verma;Susumu Mori;Dinggang Shen;Paul Yarowsky

  • Intranasal Administration of the Growth-Compromised HSV-2 Vector ΔRR Prevents Kainate-Induced Seizures and Neuronal Loss in Rats and Mice

    Jennifer M Laing;Michael D Gober;Erin K Golembewski;Scott M Thompson

  • Quantification of Brain Maturation and Growth Patterns in C57BL/6J Mice via Computational Neuroanatomy of Diffusion

    Sajjad Baloch;Ragini Verma;Hao Huang;Parmeshwar Khurd

Frequent Co-Authors

Susumu Mori
Susumu Mori Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Peter C.M. van Zijl
Peter C.M. van Zijl Kennedy Krieger Institute
Linda J. Richards
Linda J. Richards Washington University in St. Louis
Hao Huang
Hao Huang University of Pennsylvania
Laure Aurelian
Laure Aurelian University of Maryland, Baltimore
Mordecai P. Blaustein
Mordecai P. Blaustein University of Maryland, Baltimore
Adam C. Puche
Adam C. Puche University of Maryland, Baltimore
Tarik F. Haydar
Tarik F. Haydar Boston University
Randy J. Nelson
Randy J. Nelson West Virginia University
Nathan McDannold
Nathan McDannold Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience, several online degrees can complement your career goals or broaden your options within the mental health and research sectors. The field is diverse, with paths ranging from clinical psychology to counseling, therapy, and social work.

For those looking for an accessible entry point, the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology can be a cost-effective foundation, providing essential knowledge for further studies or entry-level roles.

If you aim to make a direct impact in community or healthcare settings, pursuing a masters in social work offers a flexible route to clinical or case management positions. Those seeking advanced expertise might consider exploring psyd programs, which emphasize hands-on practice and clinical skills for aspiring psychologists.

Additionally, the demand for mental health therapists is growing. Accelerated options like online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) can quickly prepare you for licensure and therapy practice.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you align your education with your desired neuroscience or mental health career path.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Yarowsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles