World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5118
World Ranking
10494
National Ranking
5514

Vanessa LoBue publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vanessa LoBue sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Vanessa LoBue D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vanessa LoBue sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vanessa LoBue is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily covers the field of Psychology, with particular focus on subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Social Psychology.

Themes central to their work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Child and Animal Learning Development, Early Childhood Education and Development, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, and Spatial Cognition and Navigation.

Vanessa LoBue has published multiple papers, including these recent works:

  • The importance of using multiple outcome measures in infant research (2020, Infancy)
  • Variable- and person-centered approaches to affect-biased attention in infancy reveal unique relations with infant negative affect and maternal anxiety (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Individual differences in infancy research: Letting the baby stand out from the crowd (2020, Infancy)
  • Study Protocol: Longitudinal Attention and Temperament Study (2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • Learning about germs in a global pandemic: Children's knowledge and avoidance of contagious illness before and after COVID-19 (2021, Cognitive Development)

The scientist frequently collaborates with peers such as Koraly Pérez-Edgar, Kristin A. Buss, Lori B. Reider, Jessica L. Burris, and Emily Kim.

Their work has been published repeatedly in several key venues, notably:

  • Infancy
  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Best Publications

  • Detecting the Snake in the Grass Attention to Fear-Relevant Stimuli by Adults and Young Children

    Vanessa LoBue;Judy S. DeLoache

  • When Getting Something Good is Bad: Even Three-year-olds React to Inequality

    Vanessa LoBue;Tracy Nishida;Cynthia Chiong;Judy S. DeLoache

  • The Child Affective Facial Expression (CAFE) set: validity and reliability from untrained adults

    Vanessa LoBue;Cat Thrasher

  • Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy.

    Vanessa LoBue;Judy S. DeLoache

  • Pretty in pink: The early development of gender‐stereotyped colour preferences

    Vanessa LoBue;Judy S. DeLoache

  • More than just another face in the crowd: superior detection of threatening facial expressions in children and adults.

    Vanessa LoBue

  • The Narrow Fellow in the Grass: Human Infants Associate Snakes and Fear.

    Judy S. DeLoache;Vanessa LoBue

  • Young children's interest in live animals.

    Vanessa LoBue;Megan Bloom Pickard;Kathleen Sherman;Chrystal Axford

  • What we fear most: A developmental advantage for threat-relevant stimuli

    Vanessa LoBue;David H. Rakison

  • Threat Perception Across the Life Span Evidence for Multiple Converging Pathways

    Vanessa LoBue;David H. Rakison;Judy S. DeLoache

  • Deconstructing the Snake: The Relative Roles of Perception, Cognition, and Emotion on Threat Detection

    Vanessa LoBue

  • And along came a spider: An attentional bias for the detection of spiders in young children and adults

    Vanessa LoBue

  • What's so special about slithering serpents? Children and adults rapidly detect snakes based on their simple features

    Vanessa Lobue;Judy S. Deloache

  • Learning About Real Animals From Anthropomorphic Media

    Megan S. Geerdts;Megan S. Geerdts;Megan S. Geerdts;Gretchen A. Van de Walle;Vanessa LoBue

  • How very young children think about animals

    Judy S. DeLoache;Megan Bloom Pickard;Vanessa LoBue

  • Developing an Understanding of Emotion Categories: Lessons from Objects

    Katie Hoemann;Rachel Wu;Vanessa LoBue;Lisa M. Oakes

  • Handbook of emotional development

    Vanessa. LoBue;Koraly. P rez-Edgar;Kristin A. Buss

  • Maternal anxiety predicts attentional bias towards threat in infancy.

    Santiago Morales;Kayla M. Brown;Bradley C. Taber-Thomas;Vanessa LoBue

  • What's so scary about needles and knives? Examining the role of experience in threat detection

    Vanessa LoBue

  • Sensitivity to social and non-social threats in temperamentally shy children at-risk for anxiety.

    Vanessa LoBue;Koraly Pérez-Edgar

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristin A. Buss
Kristin A. Buss Pennsylvania State University
Koraly Pérez-Edgar
Koraly Pérez-Edgar Pennsylvania State University
Judy S. DeLoache
Judy S. DeLoache University of Virginia
Andy P. Field
Andy P. Field University of Sussex
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University
Karen E. Adolph
Karen E. Adolph New York University
Lisa M. Oakes
Lisa M. Oakes University of California, Davis
David H. Rakison
David H. Rakison Carnegie Mellon University
James A. Coan
James A. Coan University of Virginia
Maggie Shiffrar
Maggie Shiffrar Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and dynamic career paths. Many students start with a bachelor’s in psychology before choosing a specialized field such as counseling, social work, or clinical practice. One popular and impactful career is substance abuse counseling, which is in demand across the country.

Pathways and requirements for becoming a counselor can vary by location. For those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Madison, it’s important to understand local certification and training standards. Similarly, Memphis substance abuse counselors education requirements outline specific coursework and practicum hours necessary for licensure.

Aspiring counselors in other cities like becoming a substance abuse counselor in Mesa or those researching Miami substance abuse counselors education requirements will discover unique state and city-level regulations. Choosing an online psychology degree aligned with your state’s standards ensures a smoother transition into the workforce and expands your career options in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Vanessa LoBue

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles