World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giorgio A. Tasca

Giorgio A. Tasca

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5726 5321 393 368 188 8384

Giorgio A. Tasca publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giorgio A. Tasca between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giorgio A. Tasca published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 8 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giorgio A. Tasca: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 5
2007 5
2008 2
2009 8
2010 6
2011 5
2012 6
2013 11
2014 18
2015 11
2016 16
2017 13
2018 15
2019 16
2020 12
2021 16
2022 16
2023 9
2024 10
2025 7
2026 1
Total 220
Download as CSV

Giorgio A. Tasca publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giorgio A. Tasca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 188
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Giorgio A. Tasca D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giorgio A. Tasca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Giorgio A. Tasca is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Their work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Among their recent publications are studies such as:

  • "The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis." (2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  • "Insecure Attachment and Technology Addiction Among Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Impulsivity, Alexithymia, and General Psychological Distress" (2020, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking)
  • "Self-reported reflective functioning mediates the association between attachment insecurity and well-being among psychotherapists" (2020, Psychotherapy Research)
  • "Therapists' perceptions of online group therapeutic relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey-based study." (2022, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice)
  • "The alliance-outcome association in group interventions: A multilevel meta-analysis." (2022, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Angelo Compare (14 coauthored works)
  • Agostino Brugnera (13 coauthored works)
  • Paul L. Hewitt (13 coauthored works)
  • Gianluca Lo Coco (12 coauthored works)
  • Stephanie A. Wiebe (11 coauthored works)

Their work has been published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice (6 publications)
  • Psychotherapy Research (4 publications)
  • PsycTESTS Dataset (4 publications)
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (3 publications)
  • Frontiers in Psychology (3 publications)

Tasca has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by the American Psychological Association:

  • Group psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy. (2020)

In recognition of their professional achievements, they were named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Olanzapine in the Treatment of Low Body Weight and Obsessive Thinking in Women With Anorexia Nervosa: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Hany Bissada;Giorgio A Tasca;Ann Marie Barber;Jacques Bradwejn

  • Attachment and eating disorders: A review of current research

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Louise Balfour

  • Adult attachment, depression, and eating disorder symptoms: The mediating role of affect regulation strategies

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Giorgio A. Tasca;Giorgio A. Tasca;Leah Szadkowski;Vanessa Illing;Anne Trinneer

  • Attachment scales predict outcome in a randomized controlled trial of two group therapies for binge eating disorder: An aptitude by treatment interaction

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Kerri Ritchie;Gretchen Conrad;Louise Balfour

  • A meta-analysis of the relation between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in eating disorders

    Tiffany A. Graves;Nassim Tabri;Heather Thompson-Brenner;Debra L. Franko

  • Changes in Relationship-Specific Attachment in Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy

    Melissa Burgess Moser;Susan M. Johnson;Tracy L. Dalgleish;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • An interpersonally based model of chronic pain: An application of attachment theory

    Samuel F. Mikail;Peter R. Henderson;Giorgio A. Tasca

  • Attachment insecurity predicts eating disorder symptoms and treatment outcomes in a clinical sample of women

    Vanessa Illing;Giorgio A. Tasca;Louise Balfour;Hany Bissada

  • Implications of attachment theory and research for the assessment and treatment of eating disorders.

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Kerri Ritchie;Louise Balfour

  • Internalization of the thin and muscular body ideal and disordered eating in adolescence: the mediation effects of body esteem.

    Martine F. Flament;Erin M. Hill;Annick Buchholz;Katherine Henderson

  • Predicting Change in Marital Satisfaction Throughout Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy

    Tracy L. Dalgleish;Susan M. Johnson;Melissa Burgess Moser;Marie-France Lafontaine

  • Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: I. The basics

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Robert Gallop

  • Cognitive effects of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a dose-response study.

    Barbara Collins;Joyce MacKenzie;Giorgio A. Tasca;Giorgio A. Tasca;Carole Scherling

  • Attachment Predicts Treatment Completion in an Eating Disorders Partial Hospital Program Among Women With Anorexia Nervosa

    Giorgio A Tasca;Daniel Taylor;Kerri Ritchie;Louise Balfour

  • The relationship between attachment scales and group therapy alliance growth differs by treatment type for women with binge-eating disorder.

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Louise Balfour;Kerri Ritchie;Hany Bissada

  • Is Anorexia Nervosa a Disorder of the Self? A Psychological Approach.

    Federico Amianto;Georg Northoff;Giovanni Abbate Daga;Secondo Fassino

  • Attachment insecurity mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and eating disorder psychopathology in a clinical sample: a structural equation model.

    Giorgio A. Tasca;Kerri Ritchie;Kerri Ritchie;Fotini Zachariades;Genevieve Proulx

  • What clinicians want: findings from a psychotherapy practice research network survey.

    Giorgio A. Tasca;John Sylvestre;Louise Balfour;Livia Chyurlia

  • Integrative Psychotherapy Works

    Cristina Zarbo;Giorgio Angelo Tasca;Francesco Cattafi;Angelo Compare

  • Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: II. The complexities.

    Robert Gallop;Robert Gallop;Giorgio A. Tasca;Giorgio A. Tasca

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelo Compare
Angelo Compare University of Bergamo
Paul L. Hewitt
Paul L. Hewitt University of British Columbia
Susan M. Johnson
Susan M. Johnson University of Ottawa
Gianluca Lo Coco
Gianluca Lo Coco University of Palermo
Shawn D. Aaron
Shawn D. Aaron Ottawa Hospital
John S. Ogrodniczuk
John S. Ogrodniczuk University of British Columbia
Marie-France Lafontaine
Marie-France Lafontaine University of Ottawa
Anthony S. Joyce
Anthony S. Joyce University of Alberta
Jonathan B. Angel
Jonathan B. Angel University of Ottawa
Robert Gallop
Robert Gallop West Chester University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online academic options and dynamic career pathways. Many students seek an affordable online master's in psychology programs to gain foundational knowledge and specialized skills without breaking the bank. These programs cater to working professionals who need flexibility and value.

For those interested in the intersection of psychology and the law, there are also inexpensive forensic psychology master's programs. These degrees can lead to rewarding roles in criminal justice, corrections, and forensic research.

Leadership roles in behavioral health are growing as organizations recognize the importance of mental health management. Pursuing an affordable psyd behavioral health leadership program can advance careers in clinical supervision, policy, and administration.

If your passion is broad-based support or advocacy roles, a cheap online human services degree could be the ideal fit. Human services graduates work in agencies, nonprofit organizations, and social services.

With a range of cost-effective online options, students can find degrees that align with their interests and professional goals while maintaining financial flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Giorgio A. Tasca

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles