World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gianluca Lo Coco

Gianluca Lo Coco

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10612 9933 248 244 156 4099

Gianluca Lo Coco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gianluca Lo Coco between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gianluca Lo Coco published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 23 of the 202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 13 publications
2004 2025

202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gianluca Lo Coco: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 6
2005 4
2006 8
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 3
2011 5
2012 14
2013 5
2014 4
2015 6
2016 11
2017 10
2018 9
2019 11
2020 12
2021 20
2022 20
2023 20
2024 10
2025 13
Total 202
Download as CSV

Gianluca Lo Coco publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianluca Lo Coco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gianluca Lo Coco D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianluca Lo Coco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gianluca Lo Coco is affiliated with the University of Palermo in Italy and has a primary research focus in the field of Psychology, with a substantial body of work encompassing Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's research addresses several interconnected topics, including:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Among recent publications by Gianluca Lo Coco are:

  • "Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on eating disorders and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2021, European Eating Disorders Review)
  • "Psychological distress associated with the COVID-19 lockdown: A two-wave network analysis" (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • "Maintaining everyday life praxis in the time of COVID-19 pandemic measures (ELP-COVID-19 survey)" (2020, European Journal of Public Health)
  • "The role of online social comparison as a protective factor for psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 quarantine" (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • "Examining bi-directionality between Fear of Missing Out and problematic smartphone use. A two-wave panel study among adolescents" (2020, Addictive Behaviors)

Gianluca Lo Coco has collaborated extensively with a number of co-authors, predominantly:

  • Laura Salerno
  • Salvatore Gullo
  • Gaia Albano
  • Maria Di Blasi
  • Cecilia Giordano

Frequent venues where their research appears include:

  • Body Image
  • Research in Psychotherapy Psychopathology Process and Outcome
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Research Square (Research Square)

In addition to articles, Gianluca Lo Coco has authored a book published by Dykinson eBooks titled Imagen corporal, salud y educación. (2023).

Best Publications

  • Fear of Missing Out as a Predictor of Problematic Social Media Use and Phubbing Behavior among Flemish Adolescents.

    Vittoria Franchina;Mariek Vanden Abeele;Antonius J. van Rooij;Gianluca Lo Coco

  • Problematic video game use as an emotional coping strategy: Evidence from a sample of MMORPG gamers

    Maria Di Blasi;Alessandro Giardina;Cecilia Giordano;Gianluca Lo Coco

  • Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on eating disorders and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lucia Sideli;Gianluca Lo Coco;Rubinia Celeste Bonfanti;Bianca Borsarini

  • The role of attachment dimensions and perceived social support in predicting adjustment to cancer.

    Viviana Cicero;Gianluca Lo Coco;Salvatore Gullo;Girolamo Lo Verso

  • Psychological distress associated with the COVID-19 lockdown: A two-wave network analysis.

    Maria Di Blasi;Salvatore Gullo;Elisa Mancinelli;Maria Francesca Freda

  • Relation of the real relationship and the working alliance to the outcome of brief psychotherapy.

    Gianluca Lo Coco;Salvatore Gullo;Claudia Prestano;Charles J. Gelso

  • Sleep quality in caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease and its relationship to quality of life.

    Chiara Cupidi;Sabrina Realmuto;Gianluca Lo Coco;Antonio Cinturino

  • Are attachment dimensions associated with infertility-related stress in couples undergoing their first IVF treatment? A study on the individual and cross-partner effect

    Zaira Donarelli;Gianluca Lo Coco;Salvatore Gullo;Angelo Marino

  • Maintaining everyday life praxis in the time of COVID-19 pandemic measures (ELP-COVID-19 survey).

    Saša Pišot;Ivana Milovanović;Boštjan Šimunič;Ambra Gentile

  • The factorial structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45: a study with an Italian sample

    Gianluca Lo Coco;Marco Chiappelli;Luca Bensi;Salvatore Gullo

  • Early Response to treatment in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and a Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

    Bruno Palazzo Nazar;Bruno Palazzo Nazar;Louise Kathrine Gregor;Gaia Albano;Gaia Albano;Angelo Marchica

  • The role of online social comparison as a protective factor for psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 quarantine.

    Stefano Ruggieri;Sonia Ingoglia;Rubinia Celeste Bonfanti;Gianluca Lo Coco

  • Examining bi-directionality between Fear of Missing Out and problematic smartphone use. A two-wave panel study among adolescents.

    Gianluca Lo Coco;Laura Salerno;Vittoria Franchina;Antonino La Tona

  • Group treatment for substance use disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

    Gianluca Lo Coco;Francesco Melchiori;Veronica Oieni;Maria Rita Infurna

  • An examination of the impact of care giving styles (accommodation and skilful communication and support) on the one year outcome of adolescent anorexia nervosa: Testing the assumptions of the cognitive interpersonal model in anorexia nervosa.

    Laura Salerno;Charlotte Rhind;Rebecca Hibbs;Nadia Micali;Nadia Micali

  • The Objective and Subjective Caregiving Burden and Caregiving Behaviours of Parents of Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa

    Charlotte Rhind;Laura Salerno;Rebecca Hibbs;Nadia Micali;Nadia Micali

  • A Cross-Country Examination on the Fear of COVID-19 and the Sense of Loneliness during the First Wave of COVID-19 Outbreak

    Gianluca Lo Coco;Ambra Gentile;Ksenija Bosnar;Ivana Milovanović

  • The influence of social media use on body image concerns

    Vittoria Franchina;Gianluca Lo Coco

  • Assessing positive body image, body satisfaction, weight bias, and appearance comparison in emerging adults: A cross-validation study across eight countries.

    Annie Aimé;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Jacinthe Dion;Charlotte H. Markey

  • The Italian Version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32): Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups

    Gianluca Lo Coco;Giuseppe Mannino;Laura Salerno;Veronica Oieni

  • Development and validation of a scale to measure caregiver skills in eating disorders

    Rebecca Hibbs;Charlotte Rhind;Laura Salerno;Gianluca Lo Coco

  • Group climate, cohesion and curative climate. A study on the common factors in group process and their relation with members attachment dimensions

    Salvatore Gullo;Gianluca Lo Coco;Carla Di Fratello;Francesca Giannone

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis M. Kivlighan
Dennis M. Kivlighan University of Maryland, College Park
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London
Nadia Micali
Nadia Micali University College London
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
David Mellor
David Mellor Deakin University
Valentina Cardi
Valentina Cardi University of Padua
Ulrike Schmidt
Ulrike Schmidt King's College London
Marita P. McCabe
Marita P. McCabe Swinburne University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, there are numerous online degrees and certification pathways available in the USA. Many psychology students and graduates find fulfilling careers in applied behavioral analysis. Becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular option, requiring the right education, supervised experience, and passing a national certification exam.

Educational requirements for BCBAs can vary by state. For example, you can explore the Newark bcba requirements to understand the local steps needed in New Jersey. If you’re interested in another region, gaining insight into the Norfolk bcba education requirements is important for those in Virginia.

Prospective BCBAs in Nevada should review the North Las Vegas bcba requirements to ensure they meet local standards. Similarly, those on the West Coast can find details about bcba certification requirements in Oakland.

Completing an online psychology degree can prepare you for these career paths and open doors to specialized fields such as clinical psychology, counseling, or educational psychology, all of which offer meaningful work and strong job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Gianluca Lo Coco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles