World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6843 6377 3712 3373 247 11573

Dennis M. Kivlighan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dennis M. Kivlighan between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dennis M. Kivlighan published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 22 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications
1984 2025

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dennis M. Kivlighan: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 5
1992 3
1993 6
1994 6
1995 5
1996 5
1997 3
1998 6
1999 2
2000 5
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 10
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 9
2013 5
2014 10
2015 8
2016 12
2017 13
2018 9
2019 22
2020 12
2021 32
2022 14
2023 8
2024 11
2025 11
Total 265
Download as CSV

Dennis M. Kivlighan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis M. Kivlighan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 247 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 247
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dennis M. Kivlighan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis M. Kivlighan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Dennis M. Kivlighan is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with 120 publications in the field. Subfields of their work include Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Safety Research, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research encompasses several main topics: psychotherapy techniques and applications, attachment and relationship dynamics, counseling practices and supervision, counseling, therapy and family dynamics, digital mental health interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and personality disorders and psychopathology.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Small Group Research
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • Psychotherapy

Recent papers by Dennis M. Kivlighan include:

  • Therapist and counseling center effects on international students' counseling outcome: A mixed methods study, 2021, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • The relationship between working alliance with peer mentors and eating psychopathology in a digital 6-week guided self-help intervention for anorexia nervosa, 2021, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Cultural humility, working alliance, and Outcome Rating Scale in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Between-therapist, within-therapist, and within-client effects, 2021, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Group counseling change process: An adaptive spiral among positive emotions, positive relations, and emotional cultivation/regulation, 2021, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Solicited and Unsolicited Therapist Advice in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: Is it Advised?, 2020, Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Frequent co-authors in their research are:

  • Clara E. Hill
  • Lyn M. Van Swol
  • Bertolt Meyer
  • Mira An
  • Josette Gevers

Dennis M. Kivlighan was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1997.

Best Publications

  • Research Design in Counseling

    P. Paul Heppner;Dennis M. Kivlighan;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Patterns of working alliance development: A typology of client's working alliance ratings.

    Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.;Peter Shaughnessy

  • Relevance of the Supervisory Alliance to the Counseling Alliance and to Treatment Adherence in Counselor Training.

    Michael J. Patton;Dennis M. Kivlighan

  • Analysis of the Development of the Working Alliance Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling

    Dennis M. Kivlighan;Peter Shaughnessy

  • Endorsement of therapeutic factors as a function of stage of group development and participant interpersonal attitudes

    Dennis M. Kivlighan;Debra C. Goldfine

  • CLIENT ATTACHMENT TO THERAPIST, DEPTH OF IN-SESSION EXPLORATION, AND OBJECT RELATIONS IN BRIEF PSYCHOTHERAPY

    Brent Mallinckrodt;Mary Jo Porter;Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.

  • Moderating Effects of Client Attachment on the Counselor Experience/Working Alliance Relationship.

    Dennis M. Kivlighan;Michael J. Patton;David Foote

  • STABILITY AND SEVERITY OF PRESENTING PROBLEMS AT A UNIVERSITY COUNSELING CENTER : A 6-YEAR ANALYSIS

    Deanna S. Pledge;Richard T. Lapan;P. Paul Heppner;Dennis Kivlighan

  • Congruence in client-counselor expectations for relationship and the working alliance.

    Fatima Al-Darmaki;Dennis M. Kivlighan

  • Countertransference management and effective psychotherapy: Meta-analytic findings.

    Jeffrey A. Hayes;Charles J. Gelso;Simon Goldberg;Dennis Martin Kivlighan

  • Comparison of therapeutic factors in group and individual treatment processes.

    Stacey E. Holmes;Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.

  • Does group climate mediate the group leadership–group member outcome relationship? A test of Yalom's hypotheses about leadership priorities.

    Dennis M. Kivlighan;Jeffrey M. Tarrant

  • Presenting Problems of University Counseling Center Clients: A Snapshot and Multivariate Classification Scheme.

    P. Paul Heppner;Dennis M. Kivlighan;Glenn E. Good;Helen J. Roehlke

  • Examining Immediate and Long-Term Efficacy of Rape Prevention Programming with Racially Diverse College Men.

    Mary J. Heppner;Helen A. Neville;Kendra Smith;Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.

  • The Missouri Psychoanalytic Counseling Research Project: Relation of Changes in Counseling Process to Client Outcomes

    Michael J. Patton;Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.;Karen D. Multon

  • Relation between counselors' use of intentions and clients' perception of working alliance.

    Dennis M. Kivlighan

  • Counselor Technical Activity in Cases with Improving Working Alliances and Continuing-Poor Working Alliances.

    Dennis M. Kivlighan;Patrick J. Schmitz

  • Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis.

    Cheri L. Marmarosh;Dennis M. Kivlighan

  • Helpful impacts in group counseling: Development of a multidimensional rating system.

    Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.;Karen D. Multon;Daniel F. Brossart

  • Transference, Insight, and the Course of Time-Limited Therapy.

    Charles J. Gelso;Dennis M. Kivlighan;Bruce Wine;Alissa Jones

  • Therapist Expertise in Psychotherapy Revisited

    Clara E. Hill;Sharon B. Spiegel;Mary Ann Hoffman;Dennis M. Kivlighan

Frequent Co-Authors

Gianluca Lo Coco
Gianluca Lo Coco University of Palermo
Charles J. Gelso
Charles J. Gelso University of Maryland, College Park
P. Paul Heppner
P. Paul Heppner University of Missouri
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
Mark J. Hilsenroth
Mark J. Hilsenroth Adelphi University
Victor L. Willson
Victor L. Willson Texas A&M University
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Myrna L. Friedlander
Myrna L. Friedlander University at Albany, State University of New York
Robert W. Lent
Robert W. Lent University of Maryland, College Park
Glenn E. Good
Glenn E. Good University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often leads students to consider related fields and flexible online degree options. Social work is one such pathway, offering diverse career opportunities and the ability to make a direct impact in communities. Many students are now seeking the convenience and accessibility of online programs, which are widely available at top institutions across the country.

Those searching for the best social work degree programs in Columbus or the best social work degree programs in Houston can find both on-campus and online courses with a focus on clinical, community, and school settings. If you are interested in the Northwest, review the best social work degree programs in Idaho to discover flexible degree formats that fit your schedule.

For those in the South, the best social work degrees in Jackson provide training in areas like counseling and advocacy. Psychology graduates with online degrees often transition into these rewarding social work careers, which are in high demand across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Dennis M. Kivlighan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles