World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
11042
World Ranking
6856
National Ranking
3720

Glenn E. Good publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn E. Good sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Glenn E. Good D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn E. Good sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Glenn E. Good is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their professional focus centers on psychological research and academia. Throughout their career, Good has received recognition within the psychological community, notably being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1998.

Available data does not list specific research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or subfields of study connected to Good. There is also no detailed information on main fields of study, topics of work, or book publications. Despite this, the fellowship awarded by the APA indicates engagement with the field of psychology at a recognized level within the academic community.

Good's career contributions are primarily connected to their role at the University of Missouri. This affiliation suggests involvement in both teaching and research activities within the institution. The designation as an APA Fellow reflects acknowledgment by peers for contributions to psychological science, practice, or education.

Further detailed insights on Good's research output and topic specialization are not available from the current data. The absence of listed publications and co-authors precludes a comprehensive overview of specific research themes or collaborative networks.

Best Publications

  • Emotional openness as a predictor of college students' attitudes toward seeking psychological help.

    Noboru Komiya;Glenn E. Good;Nancy B. Sherrod

  • Male role and gender role conflict: Relations to help seeking in men.

    Glenn E. Good;Don M. Dell;Laurie B. Mintz

  • Fifteen years of theory and research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research.

    James M. O'Neil;Glenn E. Good;Sarah Holmes

  • Male Gender Role Conflict, Depression, and Help Seeking: Do College Men Face Double Jeopardy?

    Glenn E. Good;Phillip K. Wood

  • Masculinity Scripts, Presenting Concerns, and Help Seeking: Implications for Practice and Training

    James R. Mahalik;Glenn E. Good;Matt Englar-Carlson

  • Male gender role conflict: Psychometric issues and relations to psychological distress.

    Glenn E. Good;John M. Robertson;James M. O'Neil;Louise F. Fitzgerald

  • Gender Role Conflict and Depression in College Men: Evidence for Compounded Risk

    Glenn E. Good;Laurie B. Mintz

  • Assessing Women's Feminist Identity Development: Studies of Convergent, Discriminant, and Structural Validity

    Ann R. Fischer;David M. Tokar;Marija M. Mergl;Glenn E. Good

  • Men and psychotherapy: An investigation of alexithymia, intimacy, and masculine gender roles.

    Ann R. Fischer;Glenn E. Good

  • Career Decision-Making and Career Search Activities: Relative Effects of Career Search Self-Efficacy and Human Agency.

    V. Scott Solberg;Glenn E. Good;Ann R. Fischer;Steven D. Brown

  • Masculinity research: A review and critique

    Glenn E. Good;Tiffany S. Borst;David L. Wallace

  • Gender Aware Therapy: A Synthesis of Feminist Therapy and Knowledge About Gender

    Glenn E. Good;Lucia A. Gilbert;Murray Scher

  • Race/Ethnicity, Color-Blind Racial Attitudes, and Multicultural Counseling Competence: The Moderating Effects of Multicultural Counseling Training

    Ruth Chu-Lien Chao;Meifen Wei;Glenn E. Good;Lisa Y. Flores

  • The Relation Between Masculine Role Conflict and Psychological Distress in Male University Counseling Center Clients

    Glenn E. Good;John M. Robertson;Louise F. Fitzgerald;Mark Stevens

  • Assessing Career Search Expectations: Development and Validation of the Career Search Efficacy Scale:

    V. Scott Solberg;Glenn E. Good;Dennis Nord;Cheryl Holm

  • Nontraditional Students' Perspectives on College Education: A Qualitative Study

    Ruth Chao;Glenn E. Good

  • The new handbook of psychotherapy and counseling with men : a comprehensive guide to settings, problems, and treatment approaches

    Gary R. Brooks;Glenn E. Good

  • Positive psychology: An empirical examination of beneficial aspects of endorsement of masculine norms.

    Joseph H. Hammer;Glenn E. Good

  • The Normative Male Alexithymia Scale: Measurement of a Gender-Linked Syndrome

    Ronald F. Levant;Glenn E. Good;Stephen W. Cook;James M. O'Neil

  • Men and therapy: critical concepts, theoretical frameworks, and research recommendations.

    Glenn E. Good;Douglas A. Thomson;Allyson D. Brathwaite

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann R. Fischer
Ann R. Fischer Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Laurie B. Mintz
Laurie B. Mintz University of Florida
P. Paul Heppner
P. Paul Heppner University of Missouri
Micah O. Mazurek
Micah O. Mazurek University of Virginia
David M. Tokar
David M. Tokar Central State University
Delwyn Catley
Delwyn Catley Children's Mercy Hospital
Ronald F. Levant
Ronald F. Levant University of Akron
Mary J. Heppner
Mary J. Heppner University of Missouri
Lisa Y. Flores
Lisa Y. Flores University of Missouri
Phillip K. Wood
Phillip K. Wood University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students choose to continue their studies through online psychology programs, which can provide flexibility while covering essential coursework needed for licensure in helping professions.

If you're interested in becoming a social worker, it's important to understand the unique requirements in different states. For example, those researching how to become a social worker in Ohio will find specific educational pathways and licensing exams they must complete. Similarly, the Oklahoma social work education requirements outline key prerequisites for practice in that state.

States like Oregon and Pennsylvania also offer distinct routes to licensure. Review the Oregon social work education requirements and Pennsylvania social work education requirements to find out the necessary steps, including accredited degrees and supervised practice hours.

No matter where you plan to work, choosing the right online degree and understanding state-specific requirements is crucial to launching your career in social work or a related psychology field.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn E. Good

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles