World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4946 4586 2717 2460 111 12432

Bonnie Moradi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bonnie Moradi between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bonnie Moradi published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2010. 3 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2010. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
2000 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bonnie Moradi: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 5
2005 4
2006 5
2007 1
2008 4
2009 4
2010 12
2011 10
2012 6
2013 9
2014 5
2015 6
2016 4
2017 4
2018 6
2019 5
2020 1
2021 5
2022 3
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 116
Download as CSV

Bonnie Moradi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonnie Moradi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bonnie Moradi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonnie Moradi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bonnie Moradi is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and has contributed to the field of psychology through various research publications. Their work spans multiple subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, general health professions, gender studies, and sociology and political science.

Their research primarily addresses topics related to LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; counseling practices and supervision; sexuality, behavior, and technology; eating disorders and behaviors; community health and development; health policy implementation science; and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Moradi has published in frequently appearing venues such as the Journal of Counseling Psychology, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, The Counseling Psychologist, and PsycTESTS Dataset. These journals have featured their work multiple times, indicating a consistent engagement with the academic community in these areas.

Recent publications include:

  • "Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis," 2020, Psychology of Women Quarterly
  • "A Test of Objectification Theory With Sexual Minority Women," 2022, Psychology of Women Quarterly
  • "Asian American People's Intragroup and Intergroup Collective Action: Identifying Key Correlates," 2022, Journal of Counseling Psychology

Significant co-authors who have collaborated frequently with Moradi include Staci Ouch, Mike C. Parent, Elliot A. Tebbe, Patrick R. Grzanka, and Alexandra S. Weis. These collaborations reflect shared research interests particularly within the domains of counseling psychology and identity studies.

Their scholarly contributions have addressed methodological rigor, subjective well-being, and intersectionality among other themes. Notable examples are:

  • "The Qualitative Imagination in Counseling Psychology: Enhancing Methodological Rigor Across Methods," 2021, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • "Examining Feminist and Critical Consciousness Conceptualizations of Women's Subjective Well-Being," 2020, The Counseling Psychologist

In total, Moradi's work encompasses around 20 publications focused broadly on psychology, with a strong emphasis on social and clinical psychology subfields. This body of research contributes to ongoing academic dialogues in the intersection of identity, mental health, and social dynamics.

Best Publications

  • OBJECTIFICATION THEORY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN: A DECADE OF ADVANCES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

    Bonnie Moradi;Yu-Ping Huang

  • Approaches to Research on Intersectionality: Perspectives on Gender, LGBT, and Racial/Ethnic Identities

    Mike C. Parent;Cirleen DeBlaere;Bonnie Moradi

  • Roles of Sexual Objectification Experiences and Internalization of Standards of Beauty in Eating Disorder Symptomatology: A Test and Extension of Objectification Theory.

    Bonnie Moradi;Danielle Dirks;Alicia V. Matteson

  • Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism.

    Bonnie Moradi;Patrick R Grzanka

  • Perceived experiences of anti-bisexual prejudice: Instrument development and evaluation.

    Melanie E. Brewster;Bonnie Moradi

  • Confirmatory factor analysis of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory and development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46.

    Mike C. Parent;Bonnie Moradi

  • Arab American Persons' Reported Experiences of Discrimination and Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Personal Control

    Bonnie Moradi;Nadia Talal Hasan

  • Suicide risk in trans populations: An application of minority stress theory.

    Elliot A. Tebbe;Bonnie Moradi

  • Counseling Psychology Research on Sexual (Orientation) Minority Issues: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges and Opportunities

    Bonnie Moradi;Jonathan J. Mohr;Roger L. Worthington;Ruth E. Fassinger

  • Perceived discrimination experiences and mental health of Latina/o american persons.

    Bonnie Moradi;Cristina Risco

  • LGB of Color and White Individuals’ Perceptions of Heterosexist Stigma, Internalized Homophobia, and Outness: Comparisons of Levels and Links

    Bonnie Moradi;Marcie C. Wiseman;Cirleen DeBlaere;Melinda B. Goodman

  • A Concomitant Examination of the Relations of Perceived Racist and Sexist Events to Psychological Distress for African American Women

    Bonnie Moradi;Linda Mezydlo Subich

  • Navigating the borderlands: the roles of minority stressors, bicultural self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility in the mental health of bisexual individuals.

    Melanie E. Brewster;Bonnie Moradi;Cirleen DeBlaere;Brandon L. Velez

  • Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory.

    Marcie C. Wiseman;Bonnie Moradi

  • Psychological Separation, Attachment Security, Vocational Self-Concept Crystallization, and Career Indecision: A Structural Equation Analysis

    David M. Tokar;Jason R. Withrow;Rosalie J. Hall;Bonnie Moradi

  • Testing the tenets of minority stress theory in workplace contexts.

    Brandon L. Velez;Bonnie Moradi;Melanie E. Brewster

  • Addressing Gender and Cultural Diversity in Body Image: Objectification Theory as a Framework for Integrating Theories and Grounding Research

    Bonnie Moradi

  • His Biceps become Him: A Test of Objectification Theory's Application to Drive for Muscularity and Propensity for Steroid Use in College Men.

    Mike C. Parent;Bonnie Moradi

  • An Abbreviated Tool for Assessing Conformity to Masculine Norms: Psychometric Properties of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46

    Mike C. Parent;Bonnie Moradi

  • Anti-transgender prejudice: A structural equation model of associated constructs.

    Esther N. Tebbe;Bonnie Moradi

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Tokar
David M. Tokar Central State University
Stephanie L. Budge
Stephanie L. Budge University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ann R. Fischer
Ann R. Fischer Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Janice D. Yoder
Janice D. Yoder Kent State University
Jonathan J. Mohr
Jonathan J. Mohr University of Maryland, College Park
Ruth E. Fassinger
Ruth E. Fassinger University of Maryland, College Park
Greg J. Neimeyer
Greg J. Neimeyer University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online programs and career opportunities, many of which intersect with the field of social work. Exploring these pathways can help you understand diverse state requirements, specialty options, and the flexibility of online education.

For those interested in social work, it’s important to learn about the certification processes that differ by state. For example, Montana social work license requirements specify degrees, supervised practice, and exam steps needed for licensure. Similarly, the process of how to become a social worker in Nebraska covers critical topics like education and continuing professional development.

If you’re considering online degrees, understanding Nevada social work education requirements will help you align your program with local standards. Additionally, reading about becoming a social worker in New Hampshire gives insights into fieldwork and exam expectations specific to that region.

Exploring these resources ensures you choose the right online degree and prepare for a rewarding psychology or social work career.

Best Scientists Citing Bonnie Moradi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles