World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5915 5499 405 379 135 9844

Rachel M. Calogero publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rachel M. Calogero between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rachel M. Calogero published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 10 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 7 publications
2003 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rachel M. Calogero: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 1
2007 7
2008 8
2009 15
2010 12
2011 16
2012 7
2013 5
2014 8
2015 5
2016 4
2017 6
2018 7
2019 13
2020 6
2021 5
2022 3
2023 7
2024 3
2025 7
Total 151
Download as CSV

Rachel M. Calogero publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel M. Calogero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rachel M. Calogero D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel M. Calogero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rachel M. Calogero is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and conducts research primarily in the field of Psychology. Their scholarly work spans subfields including Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research concentrates notably on topics such as Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Obesity and Health Practices, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions, Behavioral Health and Interventions, and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders.

Recent published papers by Rachel M. Calogero include:

  • Integrating social media variables as predictors, mediators, and moderators within body image frameworks: Potential mechanisms of action to consider in future research, 2023, Body Image
  • Smile pretty and watch your back: Personal safety anxiety and vigilance in objectification theory., 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Measurement of Feminist Identity and Attitudes Over the Past Half Century: A Critical Review and Call for Further Research, 2021, Sex Roles
  • Medical and physiological complications of exercise for individuals with an eating disorder: A narrative review, 2023, Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Self-compassion and Body Checking Among Women: the Mediating Role of Stigmatizing Self-perceptions, 2020, Mindfulness

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rachel M. Calogero include:

  • Jaclyn A. Siegel
  • Tracy L. Tylka
  • Angela Meadows
  • Tomi-Ann Roberts
  • Katarina L. Huellemann

The most common venues where this scientist publishes are:

  • Body Image
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Sex Roles
  • The Journal of Sex Research

Best Publications

  • Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4).

    Lauren M. Schaefer;Natasha L. Burke;J. Kevin Thompson;Robert F. Dedrick

  • The Weight-Inclusive versus Weight-Normative Approach to Health: Evaluating the Evidence for Prioritizing Well-Being over Weight Loss

    Tracy L. Tylka;Rachel A. Annunziato;Deb Burgard;Sigrún Daníelsdóttir

  • A Test Of Objectification Theory: The Effect Of The Male Gaze On Appearance Concerns In College Women

    Rachel M. Calogero

  • The Role of Self-Objectification in the Experience of Women with Eating Disorders

    Rachel M. Calogero;William N. Davis;J. Kevin Thompson

  • Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions.

    Rachel M. Calogero;Stacey Tantleff-Dunn;J. Kevin Thompson

  • Self-subjugation among women: exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure.

    Rachel M. Calogero;John T. Jost

  • Complimentary Weightism: The Potential Costs of Appearance-Related Commentary for Women's Self-Objectification:

    Rachel M. Calogero;Sylvia Herbozo;J. Kevin Thompson

  • The developmental effects of media-ideal internalization and self-objectification processes on adolescents’ negative body-feelings, dietary restraint, and binge eating

    Antonios Dakanalis;Giuseppe Carrà;Rachel Calogero;Roberta Fida

  • Potential implications of the objectification of women's bodies for women's sexual satisfaction.

    Rachel M. Calogero;J. Kevin Thompson

  • Objectification Theory, Self-Objectification, and Body Image

    Rachel M. Calogero

  • Objectification Theory Predicts College Women’s Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery

    Rachel M. Calogero;Afroditi Pina;Lora E. Park;Zara K. Rahemtulla

  • Objectification Processes and Disordered Eating in British Women and Men

    Rachel M. Calogero

  • Body Size Stereotyping and Internalization of the Thin Ideal in Preschool Girls

    Jennifer A. Harriger;Rachel M. Calogero;David. C. Witherington;Jane Ellen Smith

  • Objects Don’t Object Evidence That Self-Objectification Disrupts Women’s Social Activism

    Rachel M. Calogero

  • Alcohol drinking pattern and subjective health in a population-based study.

    Saverio Stranges;James Notaro;Jo L. Freudenheim;Rachel M. Calogero

  • Excessive Exercise in Eating Disorder Patients and in Healthy Women

    Jonathan M. Mond;Rachel M. Calogero

  • The Practice and Process of Healthy Exercise: An Investigation of the Treatment of Exercise Abuse in Women with Eating Disorders

    Rachel M. Calogero;Kelly N. Pedrotty

  • A new archival approach to the study of values and value--behavior relations: validation of the value lexicon.

    Anat Bardi;Rachel M. Calogero;Brian Mullen

  • The Impact of Western Beauty Ideals on the Lives of Women: A Sociocultural Perspective

    Rachel M. Calogero;Michael Boroughs;J. Kevin Thompson

  • The Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ-3): reliability and normative comparisons of eating disordered patients.

    Rachel M Calogero;William N Davis;J.Kevin Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Tracy L. Tylka
Tracy L. Tylka The Ohio State University
J. Kevin Thompson
J. Kevin Thompson University of South Florida
Robbie M. Sutton
Robbie M. Sutton University of Kent
Beate Seibt
Beate Seibt University of Oslo
Lauren M. Schaefer
Lauren M. Schaefer University of North Carolina Wilmington
Brian Mullen
Brian Mullen Syracuse University
Viren Swami
Viren Swami Anglia Ruskin University
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
Massimo Clerici
Massimo Clerici University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options tailored to your interests and career goals. Many students seeking specialized roles begin by looking for school psychology programs accredited by nasp, which prepare graduates for certification in educational settings and are highly regarded by employers.

If you’re interested in earning a degree quickly, a 1-year psychology masters online can accelerate your path to advanced positions in counseling, research, or human services. For those wanting to focus on behavioral interventions, the best online aba master's programs deliver specialized training for careers in applied behavior analysis, often essential for work with populations such as children with autism.

Additionally, a 2 year associate degree online offers a solid foundation and entry into the field, with credits that may transfer to bachelor’s programs. Each pathway offers flexible online formats, making it easier to balance studies with work or family life as you pursue your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel M. Calogero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles