World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
13983
World Ranking
7098
National Ranking
3835

Brian Mullen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Mullen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian Mullen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Mullen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Mullen was affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States. Their research spanned the fields of neuroscience and medicine, focusing particularly on cognitive neuroscience and cellular and molecular neuroscience. Their work also touched on sensory systems, rheumatology, and clinical psychology.

The main topics in Brian Mullen's research included:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Psychedelics and drug studies
  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms

Their recent publications reflected this interdisciplinary focus and included the following:

  • "An analog of psychedelics restores functional neural circuits disrupted by unpredictable stress," 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Perinatal Penicillin Exposure Affects Cortical Development and Sensory Processing," 2021, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • "Data-driven segmentation of cortical calcium dynamics," 2023, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "Data-driven filtration and segmentation of mesoscale neural dynamics," 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "User experience with a voice-enabled smartphone app to collect patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis," 2020, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

Brian Mullen frequently collaborated with a number of researchers, including:

  • Sydney Weiser
  • James B. Ackman
  • Desiderio Ascencio
  • Ju Lu
  • Michelle Tjia

The scientist's work was often published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, PLoS Computational Biology, and Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology.

Best Publications

  • The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.

    Brian Mullen;Carolyn Copper

  • Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration

    Brian Mullen;Rupert Brown;Colleen Smith

  • Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration.

    Brian Mullen;Craig Johnson;Eduardo Salas

  • Theories of group behavior.

    Brian Mullen;George R. Goethals

  • Perceptions of Ingroup and Outgroup Variability: A Meta-Analytic Integration

    Brian Mullen;Li-Tze Hu

  • The Effect of Team Building on Performance: An Integration

    Eduardo Salas;Drew Rozell;Brian Mullen;James E. Driskell

  • The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests

    Unknown

  • Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group.

    Brian Mullen

  • Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making An Integration of Tests of the Groupthink Hypothesis

    Brian Mullen;Tara Anthony;Eduardo Salas;James E. Driskell

  • The effects of democratic leadership on group member satisfaction : An integration

    Rob Foels;James E. Driskell;Brian Mullen;Eduardo Salas

  • Status, Expectations, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and Test of the Theory

    James E. Driskell;Brian Mullen

  • Salience, motivation and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership

    Brian Mullen;Eduardo Salas;James E. Driskell

  • The effectiveness of attention and rejection as coping styles: A meta-analysis of temporal differences

    Brian Mullen;Jerry Suls

  • Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations

    Brian Mullen;Li-tze Hu

  • Self‐Serving Attributions for Performance in Naturalistic Settings: A Meta‐Analytic Review1

    Brian Mullen;Catherine A. Riordan

  • Cumulative Meta-Analysis: A Consideration of Indicators of Sufficiency and Stability

    Brian Mullen;Paige Muellerleile;Birgit Bryant

  • Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches.

    Blair T. Johnson;Brian Mullen;Eduardo Salas

  • Distinctiveness‐based illusory correlations and stereotyping: A meta‐analytic integration*

    Brian Mullen;Craig Johnson

  • Cross-Racial Facial Identification: A Social Cognitive Integration

    Tara Anthony;Carolyn Copper;Brian Mullen

  • Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective

    Unknown

  • A new archival approach to the study of values and value--behavior relations: validation of the value lexicon.

    Anat Bardi;Rachel M. Calogero;Brian Mullen

  • Advanced Basic Meta-Analysis@@@DSTAT: Software for the Meta-Analytic Review of Research Literatures

    George R. Franke;Brian Mullen;Blair T. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Driskell
James E. Driskell Florida Maxima Corporation
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Rachel M. Calogero
Rachel M. Calogero University of Western Ontario
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
George R. Goethals
George R. Goethals University of Richmond
Michael Lynn
Michael Lynn Cornell University
Blair T. Johnson
Blair T. Johnson University of Connecticut
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Rupert Brown
Rupert Brown University of Sussex
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of fulfilling career paths, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. With the growing demand for mental health professionals in the USA, online psychology degree programs have become a flexible option for students who wish to enter or advance in this sector.

Each region has specific educational and certification requirements. For example, you can learn more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Chesapeake, where licensure standards may differ from other cities. If you are interested in options in Illinois, make sure to check the substance abuse counselor requirements in Chicago.

Requirements also vary on the West Coast, as detailed in the substance abuse counselor requirements in Chula Vista. Likewise, the Cincinnati substance abuse counselors education requirements provide insight into what is needed to practice in Ohio.

Exploring these diverse pathways and local regulations can help you find the online program or certification track that best fits your career goals in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Mullen

Recently Published Articles