World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 97 695 606 91 83 413 47756

Dominic Abrams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominic Abrams between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominic Abrams published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2017. 25 of the 568 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2017. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
1981 2025

568 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominic Abrams: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 2
1986 2
1987 3
1988 5
1989 8
1990 13
1991 7
1992 10
1993 7
1994 3
1995 5
1996 4
1997 1
1998 5
1999 7
2000 4
2001 10
2002 10
2003 16
2004 17
2005 12
2006 27
2007 17
2008 20
2009 21
2010 24
2011 20
2012 24
2013 19
2014 23
2015 23
2016 21
2017 38
2018 23
2019 21
2020 29
2021 23
2022 9
2023 6
2024 11
2025 14
Total 568
Download as CSV

Dominic Abrams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic Abrams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 411–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 413 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33 413
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dominic Abrams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic Abrams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58 97
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Dominic Abrams is a researcher affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their work predominantly spans social sciences and psychology, with a focus on sociology, political science, and social psychology. Abrams explores topics related to social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

Their recent publication record includes several papers published between 2020 and 2021, contributing to various reputable journals. Recent notable papers are:

  • "A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change" (2020), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "The dangers of distrustful complacency: Low concern and low political trust combine to undermine compliance with governmental restrictions in the emerging Covid-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Changes in political trust in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: integrated public opinion evidence and implications" (2021), published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "Intergroup and intragroup dimensions of COVID-19: A social identity perspective on social fragmentation and unity" (2021), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Being future-conscious during a global crisis: The protective effect of heightened Futures Consciousness in the COVID-19 pandemic" (2021), published in Personality and Individual Differences

Abrams frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Their main research fields include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Key subfields of study cover:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Applied Psychology

The topics Abrams addresses in their research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Abrams collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Fanny Lalot, Giovanni A. Travaglino, Hirotaka Imada, Ben Davies, and Tim Hopthrow. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications across different social and psychological research topics.

Best Publications

  • Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams

  • Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures

    Peter Glick;Susan T. Fiske;Antonio Mladinic;José L. Saiz

  • Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization.

    Dominic Abrams;Margaret Wetherell;Sandra Cochrane;Michael A. Hogg

  • Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • The Social Identity Perspective Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams;Sabine Otten;Steve Hinkle

  • Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity.

    Dominic Abrams;G. Tendayi Viki;Barbara Masser;Gerd Bohner

  • Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions

    Dominic Abrams;Kaori Ando;Steve Hinkle

  • Social Identity and Social Cognition

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups.

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams

  • A Review and Meta-Analysis of Age-Based Stereotype Threat: Negative Stereotypes, Not Facts, Do the Damage

    Ruth A. Lamont;Hannah J. Swift;Dominic Abrams

  • Being better by being right : Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined

    Jose M. Marques;Dominic Abrams;Rui G. Serodio

  • The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg;José M. Marques

  • A Social Psychological Framework for Understanding Social Inclusion and Exclusion

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg;Jose M. Marques

  • Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups.

    Dominic Abrams;José M. Marques;Nicola Bown;Michelle Henson

  • The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members

    Jose M. Marques;Dominic Abrams;Dominic Paez;Cristina Martinez-Taboada

  • A New Social-Cognitive Developmental Perspective on Prejudice The Interplay Between Morality and Group Identity

    Adam Rutland;Melanie Killen;Dominic Abrams

  • An introduction to the social identity approach

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Social identity and intergroup relations.

    Dominic Abrams

  • Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams

  • Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization

    Dominic Abrams;Margaret Wetherell;Sandra Cochrane;Michael A. Hogg

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Adam Rutland
Adam Rutland University of Exeter
Edward P. Walsh
Edward P. Walsh Boston Children's Hospital
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
John K. Triedman
John K. Triedman Boston Children's Hospital
Paschal Sheeran
Paschal Sheeran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Arthur A.M. Wilde University of Amsterdam
Melanie Killen
Melanie Killen University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a range of pathways in mental health and community services. Many students find that online degrees in social work complement their psychology background, offering hands-on avenues to support individuals and communities.

Cost is a significant concern, but there are many affordable options. For instance, those interested in the Southeast can explore the cheapest social work programs in Little Rock, while students in Massachusetts can look at the cheapest social work programs in Massachusetts. Similarly, aspiring professionals near Wisconsin may benefit from the cheapest social work programs in Madison.

Affordability helps make education accessible and supports diverse career goals. Opportunities also exist in the Midwest through affordable social work degrees in Marion. These social work programs often feature flexible online courses, ideal for psychology students seeking career advancement or new specializations.

Best Scientists Citing Dominic Abrams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles