World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
97
Citations
47756
World Ranking
695
National Ranking
91

Dominic Abrams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic Abrams sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 413 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dominic Abrams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic Abrams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Dominic Abrams is a researcher affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their work predominantly spans social sciences and psychology, with a focus on sociology, political science, and social psychology. Abrams explores topics related to social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

Their recent publication record includes several papers published between 2020 and 2021, contributing to various reputable journals. Recent notable papers are:

  • "A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change" (2020), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "The dangers of distrustful complacency: Low concern and low political trust combine to undermine compliance with governmental restrictions in the emerging Covid-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Changes in political trust in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: integrated public opinion evidence and implications" (2021), published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "Intergroup and intragroup dimensions of COVID-19: A social identity perspective on social fragmentation and unity" (2021), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Being future-conscious during a global crisis: The protective effect of heightened Futures Consciousness in the COVID-19 pandemic" (2021), published in Personality and Individual Differences

Abrams frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Their main research fields include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Key subfields of study cover:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Applied Psychology

The topics Abrams addresses in their research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Abrams collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Fanny Lalot, Giovanni A. Travaglino, Hirotaka Imada, Ben Davies, and Tim Hopthrow. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications across different social and psychological research topics.

Best Publications

  • Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams

  • Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures

    Peter Glick;Susan T. Fiske;Antonio Mladinic;José L. Saiz

  • Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization.

    Dominic Abrams;Margaret Wetherell;Sandra Cochrane;Michael A. Hogg

  • Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • The Social Identity Perspective Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams;Sabine Otten;Steve Hinkle

  • Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity.

    Dominic Abrams;G. Tendayi Viki;Barbara Masser;Gerd Bohner

  • Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions

    Dominic Abrams;Kaori Ando;Steve Hinkle

  • Social Identity and Social Cognition

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups.

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams

  • A Review and Meta-Analysis of Age-Based Stereotype Threat: Negative Stereotypes, Not Facts, Do the Damage

    Ruth A. Lamont;Hannah J. Swift;Dominic Abrams

  • Being better by being right : Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined

    Jose M. Marques;Dominic Abrams;Rui G. Serodio

  • The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg;José M. Marques

  • A Social Psychological Framework for Understanding Social Inclusion and Exclusion

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg;Jose M. Marques

  • Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups.

    Dominic Abrams;José M. Marques;Nicola Bown;Michelle Henson

  • The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members

    Jose M. Marques;Dominic Abrams;Dominic Paez;Cristina Martinez-Taboada

  • A New Social-Cognitive Developmental Perspective on Prejudice The Interplay Between Morality and Group Identity

    Adam Rutland;Melanie Killen;Dominic Abrams

  • An introduction to the social identity approach

    Dominic Abrams;Michael A. Hogg

  • Social identity and intergroup relations.

    Dominic Abrams

  • Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives

    Michael A. Hogg;Dominic Abrams

  • Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization

    Dominic Abrams;Margaret Wetherell;Sandra Cochrane;Michael A. Hogg

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Adam Rutland
Adam Rutland University of Exeter
Edward P. Walsh
Edward P. Walsh Boston Children's Hospital
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
John K. Triedman
John K. Triedman Boston Children's Hospital
Paschal Sheeran
Paschal Sheeran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Charles Abraham
Charles Abraham University of Exeter
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Arthur A.M. Wilde University of Amsterdam
Melanie Killen
Melanie Killen University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens a range of pathways in mental health and community services. Many students find that online degrees in social work complement their psychology background, offering hands-on avenues to support individuals and communities.

Cost is a significant concern, but there are many affordable options. For instance, those interested in the Southeast can explore the cheapest social work programs in Little Rock, while students in Massachusetts can look at the cheapest social work programs in Massachusetts. Similarly, aspiring professionals near Wisconsin may benefit from the cheapest social work programs in Madison.

Affordability helps make education accessible and supports diverse career goals. Opportunities also exist in the Midwest through affordable social work degrees in Marion. These social work programs often feature flexible online courses, ideal for psychology students seeking career advancement or new specializations.

Best Scientists Citing Dominic Abrams

Trending Scientists