World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
9031
World Ranking
6879
National Ranking
2973

Glen T. Prusky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen T. Prusky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Glen T. Prusky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glen T. Prusky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glen T. Prusky is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans several domains within biology and medicine, with a particular focus on molecular and cellular processes affecting the nervous system and visual function.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine

Within these fields, Prusky has concentrated on subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Epidemiology

Their research topics reflect detailed interest in vision and neural mechanisms, particularly:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Cellular transport and secretion

Glen T. Prusky's recent publications demonstrate engagement with experimental studies on visual impairment, neuroglial signaling, and neurodegenerative diseases affecting the peripheral and central nervous systems. Key papers include:

  • "HDAC6 inhibition promotes α-tubulin acetylation and ameliorates CMT2A peripheral neuropathy in mice" (2020) published in Experimental Neurology
  • "Retinal and Callosal Activity-Dependent Chandelier Cell Elimination Shapes Binocularity in Primary Visual Cortex" (2020) published in Neuron
  • "Retinoschisin Deficiency Induces Persistent Aberrant Waves of Activity Affecting Neuroglial Signaling in the Retina" (2022) published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Tracking-Based Interactive Assessment of Saccades, Pursuits, Visual Field, and Contrast Sensitivity in Children With Brain Injury" (2021) published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Treatment of age-related visual impairment with a peptide acting on mitochondria" (2021) published in Disease Models & Mechanisms

Prusky frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • Experimental Neurology
  • Neuron

Collaboration is an important aspect of this researcher's work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Nazia M. Alam
  • Scott W.J. Mooney
  • Farhad Farjood
  • Justine D. Manos
  • Anne L. Williams

Best Publications

  • Rapid Quantification of Adult and Developing Mouse Spatial Vision Using a Virtual Optomotor System

    Glen T Prusky;Nazia M Alam;Steven Beekman;Robert M Douglas;Robert M Douglas

  • Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats.

    Glen T Prusky;Paul W.R West;Robert M Douglas

  • Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion-cell photoreceptors: cellular diversity and role in pattern vision

    Jennifer L. Ecker;Olivia N. Dumitrescu;Kwoon Y. Wong;Nazia M. Alam

  • Independent visual threshold measurements in the two eyes of freely moving rats and mice using a virtual-reality optokinetic system.

    R.M. Douglas;N.M. Alam;B.D. Silver;T.J. Mcgill

  • Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains

    Glen T Prusky;K.Troy Harker;Robert M Douglas;Ian Q Whishaw

  • N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists disrupt the formation of a mammalian neural map.

    David K. Simon;Glen T. Prusky;Dennis D. M. O'Leary;Martha Constantine-Paton

  • Protection of mitochondria prevents high-fat diet-induced glomerulopathy and proximal tubular injury.

    Hazel H. Szeto;Shaoyi Liu;Yi Soong;Nazia Alam

  • Rod photoreceptors drive circadian photoentrainment across a wide range of light intensities

    Cara M Altimus;Ali D Güler;Nazia M Alam;A Cyrus Arman

  • Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity.

    Glen T. Prusky;Robert M. Douglas

  • A Role for Melanopsin in Alpha Retinal Ganglion Cells and Contrast Detection

    Tiffany M. Schmidt;Nazia M. Alam;Shan Chen;Paulo Kofuji

  • Characterization of mouse cortical spatial vision.

    G.T. Prusky;R.M. Douglas

  • Ruling out and ruling in neural codes

    Adam L. Jacobs;Gene Fridman;Robert M. Douglas;Nazia M. Alam

  • Cervical motoneuron topography reflects the proximodistal organization of muscles and movements of the rat forelimb: a retrograde carbocyanine dye analysis.

    John E. McKenna;Glen T. Prusky;Ian Q. Whishaw

  • Mood, the Circadian System, and Melanopsin Retinal Ganglion Cells.

    Lorenzo Lazzerini Ospri;Glen Prusky;Samer Hattar

  • Enhancement of Vision by Monocular Deprivation in Adult Mice

    Glen T. Prusky;Nazia M. Alam;Robert M. Douglas

  • Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex

    G. T. Prusky;R. M. Douglas;L. Nelson;A. Shabanpoor

  • Nicotine receptors are located on lateral geniculate nucleus terminals in cat visual cortex.

    Glen T. Prusky;Chris Shaw;Max S. Cynader

  • Environmental enrichment from birth enhances visual acuity but not place learning in mice.

    Glen T Prusky;Candace Reidel;Robert M Douglas

  • Experience-dependent plasticity of visual acuity in rats.

    Glen T. Prusky;Paul W. R. West;Robert M. Douglas

  • Intraocular CNTF Reduces Vision in Normal Rats in a Dose-Dependent Manner

    Trevor J. McGill;Glen T. Prusky;Robert M. Douglas;Robert M. Douglas;Douglas Yasumura

  • Research report Variation in visual acuity within pigmented, and between pigmented and albino rat strains

    Glen T. Prusky;K. Troy Harker;Robert M. Douglas;Ian Q. Whishaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Max S. Cynader
Max S. Cynader University of British Columbia
Samer Hattar
Samer Hattar National Institutes of Health
Raymond D. Lund
Raymond D. Lund University of Utah
Robert J. Sutherland
Robert J. Sutherland University of Lethbridge
Matthew M. LaVail
Matthew M. LaVail University of California, San Francisco
Ian Q. Whishaw
Ian Q. Whishaw University of Lethbridge
Enrique Rodriguez-Boulan
Enrique Rodriguez-Boulan Cornell University
Michael Wilkinson
Michael Wilkinson Dalhousie University
Jerry W. Rudy
Jerry W. Rudy University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in Neuroscience but seeking flexible study options, several online degrees and career pathways could complement your goals. Many students explore psychology or counseling fields, which allow a deep understanding of the human mind and behavior alongside neuroscience studies.

For those inclined toward therapy, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer specialized training in relationship and family dynamics. Similarly, affordable options for an online masters psychology degree can help open doors to research, counseling, or education roles.

If you prefer a broader focus, a psychology degree is a versatile choice, covering foundational knowledge in mental processes and behavior. Alternatively, social work is another growing field linked to neuroscience. For a fast-track option, consider 1 year msw programs online no bsw, which are designed for rapid entry into social work careers, even for those without a bachelor’s in the field.

Each of these online pathways can supplement your neuroscience expertise and broaden your career opportunities in mental health, education, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Glen T. Prusky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles