World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew D. Huberman

Andrew D. Huberman

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
13277
World Ranking
6804
National Ranking
2942

Andrew D. Huberman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Huberman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Andrew D. Huberman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Huberman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew D. Huberman is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience, with significant contributions in the subfields of cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and endocrine and autonomic systems.

Their work addresses several main topics including retinal development and disorders, nerve injury and regeneration, circadian rhythm and melatonin, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, axon guidance and neuronal signaling, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, as well as traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances.

Recent publications by Andrew D. Huberman include the following papers:

  • Central nervous system regeneration, 2022, Cell
  • Neurotoxic Reactive Astrocytes Drive Neuronal Death after Retinal Injury, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal, 2023, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Divergent outputs of the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus mediate visually evoked defensive behaviors, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Human Responses to Visually Evoked Threat, 2020, Current Biology

They frequently publish in journals such as Cell Reports, Current Biology, Experimental Neurology, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, and Cell.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Supraja G. Varadarajan
  • John L Hunyara
  • Alex L. Kolodkin
  • Kevin A. Guttenplan
  • Benjamin K. Stafford

Best Publications

  • The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination.

    Beth Stevens;Nicola J. Allen;Luis E. Vazquez;Gareth R. Howell

  • Gabapentin Receptor α2δ-1 Is a Neuronal Thrombospondin Receptor Responsible for Excitatory CNS Synaptogenesis

    Çagla Eroglu;Çagla Eroglu;Nicola J. Allen;Michael W. Susman;Nancy A. O'Rourke

  • Mechanisms Underlying Development of Visual Maps and Receptive Fields

    Andrew D. Huberman;Marla B. Feller;Barbara Chapman

  • Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation

    Terrance J. Williams;Michelle E. Pepitone;Scott E. Christensen;Bradley M. Cooke

  • What can mice tell us about how vision works

    Andrew D. Huberman;Cristopher M. Niell

  • Genetic Identification of an On-Off Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtype Reveals a Layer-Specific Subcortical Map of Posterior Motion

    Andrew D. Huberman;Wei Wei;Justin Elstrott;Ben K. Stafford

  • Diverse Visual Features Encoded in Mouse Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

    Denise M. Piscopo;Rana N. El-Danaf;Andrew D. Huberman;Cristopher M. Niell

  • A dedicated circuit links direction-selective retinal ganglion cells to the primary visual cortex

    Alberto Cruz-Martín;Rana N. El-Danaf;Fumitaka Osakada;Balaji Sriram

  • Architecture, Function, and Assembly of the Mouse Visual System.

    Tania A Seabrook;Timothy J Burbridge;Michael C Crair;Andrew D Huberman

  • Architecture and activity-mediated refinement of axonal projections from a mosaic of genetically identified retinal ganglion cells.

    Andrew D. Huberman;Mihai Manu;Selina M. Koch;Michael W. Susman

  • Neural activity promotes long-distance, target-specific regeneration of adult retinal axons

    Jung-Hwan A Lim;Benjamin K Stafford;Phong L Nguyen;Brian V Lien

  • Central nervous system regeneration

    Unknown

  • Characteristic patterns of dendritic remodeling in early-stage glaucoma: evidence from genetically identified retinal ganglion cell types.

    Rana N. El-Danaf;Andrew D. Huberman

  • Transgenic Mice Reveal Unexpected Diversity of On-Off Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtypes and Brain Structures Involved in Motion Processing

    Michal Rivlin-Etzion;Kaili Zhou;Wei Wei;Justin Elstrott

  • Neuronal Pentraxins Mediate Synaptic Refinement in the Developing Visual System

    Lisa Bjartmar;Andrew D Huberman;Erik M Ullian;Rene C Renterıa

  • Retinal ganglion cell maps in the brain: implications for visual processing.

    Onkar S Dhande;Andrew D Huberman

  • Neurotoxic Reactive Astrocytes Drive Neuronal Death after Retinal Injury

    Kevin A. Guttenplan;Benjamin K. Stafford;Rana N. El-Danaf;Drew I. Adler

  • Genetic Dissection of Retinal Inputs to Brainstem Nuclei Controlling Image Stabilization

    Onkar S. Dhande;Maureen E. Estevez;Lauren E. Quattrochi;Rana N. El-Danaf

  • A midline thalamic circuit determines reactions to visual threat

    Lindsey D. Salay;Nao Ishiko;Andrew D. Huberman

  • Contributions of Retinal Ganglion Cells to Subcortical Visual Processing and Behaviors.

    Onkar S Dhande;Benjamin K Stafford;Jung-Hwan A Lim;Andrew D Huberman

  • Cadherin-6 mediates axon-target matching in a non-image-forming visual circuit.

    Jessica A. Osterhout;Nicko Josten;Jena Yamada;Feng Pan

  • Gabapentin Receptor alpha 2 delta-1 Is a Neuronal Thrombospondin Receptor Responsible for Excitatory CNS Synaptogenesis

    Cagla Eroglu;Nicola J. Allen;Michael W. Susman;Nancy A. O'Rourke

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben A. Barres
Ben A. Barres Stanford University
Marla B. Feller
Marla B. Feller University of California, Berkeley
David M. Berson
David M. Berson Brown University
Constance L. Cepko
Constance L. Cepko Harvard University
Cagla Eroglu
Cagla Eroglu Duke University
Stewart A. Bloomfield
Stewart A. Bloomfield New York University
Erik M. Ullian
Erik M. Ullian University of California, San Francisco
Leo M. Chalupa
Leo M. Chalupa University of California, Davis
Nicola J. Allen
Nicola J. Allen Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Massimo Scanziani
Massimo Scanziani University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. Huberman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles