World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Constance L. Cepko

Constance L. Cepko

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 119 589 560 354 333 322 51940
Neuroscience 118 407 366 241 214 299 52989
Genetics 119 391 377 200 192 280 52559
Molecular Biology 119 270 249 159 146 280 52559

Constance L. Cepko publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Constance L. Cepko between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Constance L. Cepko published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2008. 25 of the 355 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2008. 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
1981 2025

355 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Constance L. Cepko: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 3
1982 2
1983 4
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 3
1988 4
1989 3
1990 7
1991 0
1992 9
1993 12
1994 4
1995 3
1996 12
1997 8
1998 8
1999 8
2000 14
2001 13
2002 9
2003 5
2004 10
2005 9
2006 7
2007 9
2008 16
2009 12
2010 8
2011 7
2012 7
2013 10
2014 9
2015 13
2016 13
2017 6
2018 9
2019 11
2020 12
2021 11
2022 8
2023 8
2024 11
2025 14
Total 355
Download as CSV

Constance L. Cepko publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constance L. Cepko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 277–286 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 280 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49 280
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Constance L. Cepko D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constance L. Cepko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23 119
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Constance L. Cepko is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research focuses primarily on molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and ophthalmology, with additional work in immunology and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate a wide range of topics and publication venues. Notable publications include:

  • SARS-CoV-2 detection using isothermal amplification and a rapid, inexpensive protocol for sample inactivation and purification (2020) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Optimizing Nervous System-Specific Gene Targeting with Cre Driver Lines: Prevalence of Germline Recombination and Influencing Factors (2020) in Neuron
  • Engineering adeno-associated viral vectors to evade innate immune and inflammatory responses (2021) in Science Translational Medicine
  • Nrf2 overexpression rescues the RPE in mouse models of retinitis pigmentosa (2021) in JCI Insight
  • Light-Seq: light-directed in situ barcoding of biomolecules in fixed cells and tissues for spatially indexed sequencing (2022) in Nature Methods

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors including Yunlu Xue, Sean K. Wang, Emma R. West, Brian Rabe, and Ryoji Amamoto.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • eLife
  • Development
  • JCI Insight

The main fields of study covered are biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with major subfields in:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology
  • Immunology
  • Biomedical Engineering

The scientist's research topics span:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Among the awards received are membership in the National Academy of Sciences since 2002 and fellowship of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1998.

Best Publications

  • A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development

    David L. Turner;Constance L. Cepko

  • Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro.

    Takahiko Matsuda;Constance L. Cepko

  • Construction and applications of a highly transmissible murine retrovirus shuttle vector.

    Constance L. Cepko;Bryan E. Roberts;Richard C. Mulligan

  • Crx, a novel otx-like homeobox gene, shows photoreceptor-specific expression and regulates photoreceptor differentiation.

    Takahisa Furukawa;Eric M Morrow;Constance L Cepko

  • Lineage analysis in the vertebrate nervous system by retrovirus-mediated gene transfer.

    Jack Price;David Turner;Constance Cepko

  • Comprehensive Classification of Retinal Bipolar Neurons by Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

    Karthik Shekhar;Sylvain W. Lapan;Sylvain W. Lapan;Irene E. Whitney;Nicholas M. Tran

  • Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina

    Constance L. Cepko;Christopher P. Austin;Xianjie Yang;Macrene Alexiades

  • Vertebrate neural cell-fate determination: Lessons from the retina

    F. J. Livesey;C. L. Cepko

  • Multipotent neural cell lines can engraft and participate in development of mouse cerebellum.

    Evan Y. Snyder;David L. Deitcher;Christopher Walsh;Susan Arnold-Aldea

  • Lineage-independent determination of cell type in the embryonic mouse retina

    David L. Turner;Evan Y. Snyder;Constance L. Cepko

  • Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electroporation

    Takahiko Matsuda;Constance L. Cepko

  • The origin and evolution of cell types

    Detlev Arendt;Jacob M. Musser;Clare V. H. Baker;Aviv Bergman;Aviv Bergman

  • rax, Hes1, and notch1 promote the formation of Müller glia by postnatal retinal progenitor cells.

    Takahisa Furukawa;Siddhartha Mukherjee;Zheng-Zheng Bao;Eric M. Morrow

  • Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor

    Carol L. Freund;Cheryl Y. Gregory-Evans;Takahisa Furukawa;Myrto Papaioannou

  • Light-activated channels targeted to ON bipolar cells restore visual function in retinal degeneration.

    Pamela S Lagali;David Balya;Gautam B Awatramani;Gautam B Awatramani;Thomas A Münch

  • Genomic Analysis of Mouse Retinal Development

    Seth Blackshaw;Sanjiv Harpavat;Jeff Trimarchi;Li Cai

  • Widespread dispersion of neuronal clones across functional regions of the cerebral cortex.

    Christopher Walsh;Constance L. Cepko

  • Retinopathy and attenuated circadian entrainment in Crx-deficient mice.

    Takahisa Furukawa;Takahisa Furukawa;Eric M. Morrow;Tiansen Li;Fred C. Davis

  • Control of Müller glial cell proliferation and activation following retinal injury.

    Michael A. Dyer;Constance L. Cepko

  • Vertebrate retinal ganglion cells are selected from competent progenitors by the action of Notch

    C.P. Austin;D.E. Feldman;J.A. Ida;C.L. Cepko

Frequent Co-Authors

Takahisa Furukawa
Takahisa Furukawa Osaka University
Eric M. Morrow
Eric M. Morrow Brown University
Seth Blackshaw
Seth Blackshaw Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael A. Dyer
Michael A. Dyer St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Donna M. Fekete
Donna M. Fekete Purdue University West Lafayette
Christopher A. Walsh
Christopher A. Walsh Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Jeffrey A. Golden
Jeffrey A. Golden Brigham and Women's Hospital
Frederick J. Livesey
Frederick J. Livesey University College London
Aviv Regev
Aviv Regev Genentech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology can open doors to diverse career paths, from research to clinical roles and beyond. Many students are now considering flexible learning with non profit online universities. These institutions often offer accredited programs with affordable tuition, making higher education more accessible.

Support for specific groups is also growing. For veterans and service members, online military friendly colleges provide tailored resources and flexible schedules to help balance studies and service commitments.

Students seeking interdisciplinary skills may combine biology with specialties like social care or psychology. Options such as social work master programs online or accelerated psychology degree online are ideal for those interested in community outreach, counseling, or clinical support.

Whether advancing research skills or branching into allied fields, online degrees provide the flexibility and specialized pathways needed to thrive in and beyond molecular biology.

Best Scientists Citing Constance L. Cepko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles