World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8587
World Ranking
5996
National Ranking
2622

Daniel B. Polley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel B. Polley sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel B. Polley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel B. Polley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel B. Polley is a researcher affiliated with the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and sensory systems. The scope of their research covers a range of topics related to hearing and auditory processing.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Within the broader field of neuroscience, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Molecular Biology

Daniel B. Polley has authored numerous research papers published in several scientific journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Cochlear neural degeneration disrupts hearing in background noise by increasing auditory cortex internal noise," 2021, Neuron
  • "Bottom-up and top-down neural signatures of disordered multi-talker speech perception in adults with normal hearing," 2020, eLife
  • "Auditory Corticothalamic Neurons Are Recruited by Motor Preparatory Inputs," 2020, Current Biology
  • "Inverted central auditory hierarchies for encoding local intervals and global temporal patterns," 2021, Current Biology
  • "Neural signatures of auditory hypersensitivity following acoustic trauma," 2022, eLife

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Kenneth E. Hancock
  • Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
  • Kameron K. Clayton
  • Kelly N. Jahn
  • Jenna A. Sugai

Published work appears regularly in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Current Biology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Neuron

In addition to journal articles, Daniel B. Polley has contributed to academic literature through book publications. One example includes a book titled The Thalamus, published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Perceptual Learning Directs Auditory Cortical Map Reorganization through Top-Down Influences

    Daniel B. Polley;Elizabeth E. Steinberg;Michael M. Merzenich

  • Treatment of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of genome editing agents

    Xue Gao;Yong Tao;Yong Tao;Yong Tao;Veronica Lamas;Mingqian Huang

  • Multiparametric auditory receptive field organization across five cortical fields in the albino rat.

    Daniel B. Polley;Heather L. Read;Douglas A. Storace;Michael M. Merzenich

  • Central Gain Restores Auditory Processing following Near-Complete Cochlear Denervation.

    Anna R. Chambers;Jennifer Resnik;Jennifer Resnik;Yasheng Yuan;Jonathon P. Whitton

  • A critical period for auditory thalamocortical connectivity

    Tania Rinaldi Barkat;Daniel B Polley;Takao K Hensch

  • Robustness of Cortical Topography across Fields, Laminae, Anesthetic States, and Neurophysiological Signal Types

    Wei Guo;Anna R. Chambers;Anna R. Chambers;Keith N. Darrow;Keith N. Darrow;Kenneth E. Hancock;Kenneth E. Hancock

  • Long-term modification of cortical synapses improves sensory perception

    Robert C Froemke;Ioana Carcea;Ioana Carcea;Alison J Barker;Kexin Yuan

  • Monaural deprivation disrupts development of binaural selectivity in auditory midbrain and cortex.

    Maria V. Popescu;Daniel B. Polley

  • Linking Topography to Tonotopy in the Mouse Auditory Thalamocortical Circuit

    Troy A. Hackett;Tania Rinaldi Barkat;Barbara M. J. O'Brien;Takao K. Hensch

  • Naturalistic experience transforms sensory maps in the adult cortex of caged animals

    Daniel B Polley;Eugen Kvasnák;Ron D Frostig

  • A Corticothalamic Circuit for Dynamic Switching between Feature Detection and Discrimination

    Wei Guo;Wei Guo;Amanda R. Clause;Asa Barth-Maron;Daniel B. Polley;Daniel B. Polley

  • Biased signalling and proteinase-activated receptors (PARs): targeting inflammatory disease.

    M D Hollenberg;K Mihara;D Polley;J Y Suen

  • Two directions of plasticity in the sensory-deprived adult cortex.

    Daniel B Polley;Cynthia H Chen-Bee;Ron D Frostig

  • Improved TMC1 gene therapy restores hearing and balance in mice with genetic inner ear disorders.

    Carl A. Nist-Lund;Bifeng Pan;Bifeng Pan;Amy Patterson;Yukako Asai;Yukako Asai

  • Associative learning shapes the neural code for stimulus magnitude in primary auditory cortex

    Daniel B. Polley;Marc A. Heiser;David T. Blake;Christoph E. Schreiner

  • Fine functional organization of auditory cortex revealed by Fourier optical imaging.

    Valery A. Kalatsky;Daniel B. Polley;Michael M. Merzenich;Christoph E. Schreiner

  • Evaluating the Perceptual and Pathophysiological Consequences of Auditory Deprivation in Early Postnatal Life: A Comparison of Basic and Clinical Studies

    Jonathon P. Whitton;Daniel B. Polley;Daniel B. Polley

  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Is Required for Rapid Experience-Dependent Regulation of the Potassium Channel Kv3.1b

    John G. Strumbos;Maile R. Brown;Jack Kronengold;Daniel B. Polley

  • Brief hearing loss disrupts binaural integration during two early critical periods of auditory cortex development

    Daniel B. Polley;John H. Thompson;Wei Guo;Wei Guo

  • Local versus global scales of organization in auditory cortex.

    Patrick O. Kanold;Israel Nelken;Daniel B. Polley;Daniel B. Polley

  • Cochlear neural degeneration disrupts hearing in background noise by increasing auditory cortex internal noise.

    Jennifer Resnik;Jennifer Resnik;Daniel B. Polley;Daniel B. Polley

Frequent Co-Authors

Troy A. Hackett
Troy A. Hackett Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Michael M. Merzenich
Michael M. Merzenich University of California, San Francisco
M. Charles Liberman
M. Charles Liberman Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Christoph E. Schreiner
Christoph E. Schreiner University of California, San Francisco
Albert S.B. Edge
Albert S.B. Edge Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Jeffrey R. Holt
Jeffrey R. Holt Boston Children's Hospital
Ron D. Frostig
Ron D. Frostig University of California, Irvine
Daniel J. Lee
Daniel J. Lee Samsung (South Korea)
Stéphane F. Maison
Stéphane F. Maison Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham
Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel B. Polley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles