World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 116 673 642 404 382 575 52152
Medicine 118 4048 3792 2216 2052 573 53415

Susan Groshen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susan Groshen between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susan Groshen published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 17.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 152 publications in 2023. 5 of the 730 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 152. Peak 152 publications in 2023. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 34 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 152 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1984 2025

730 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susan Groshen: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 2
1989 7
1990 3
1991 9
1992 2
1993 9
1994 8
1995 11
1996 12
1997 16
1998 15
1999 15
2000 16
2001 16
2002 10
2003 12
2004 34
2005 19
2006 30
2007 19
2008 24
2009 25
2010 22
2011 23
2012 26
2013 20
2014 21
2015 28
2016 29
2017 26
2018 16
2019 15
2020 7
2021 9
2022 10
2023 152
2024 3
2025 2
Total 730
Download as CSV

Susan Groshen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Groshen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 573 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 573
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Susan Groshen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Groshen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 118
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Susan Groshen is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Oncology, Surgery, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Cancer Research. Their work spans multiple topics including Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments, Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism, Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments, Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies, Lung Cancer Research Studies, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on cancer and neuroblastoma treatments, with notable publications such as:

  • "Radical Cystectomy in the Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer: Long-Term Results in 1,054 Patients" (2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • "Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data from Randomised Controlled Trials" (2021, European Urology)
  • "Lorlatinib with or without chemotherapy in ALK-driven refractory/relapsed neuroblastoma: phase 1 trial results" (2023, Nature Medicine)
  • "Randomized Phase II Trial of MIBG Versus MIBG, Vincristine, and Irinotecan Versus MIBG and Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Report From NANT Consortium" (2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • "Repopulation of T, B, and NK cells following alemtuzumab treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis" (2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Susan Groshen include Denice Tsao-Wei, Julie R. Park, Katherine K. Matthay, Araz Marachelian, and Meaghan Granger, indicating collaborative research efforts in related fields.

The primary venues for their publications are:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Their research spans across multiple subfields of medicine, focusing on clinical oncology and surgery among others.

Susan Groshen was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Radical Cystectomy in the Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer: Long-Term Results in 1,054 Patients

    John P. Stein;Gary Lieskovsky;Richard Cote;Susan Groshen

  • Colorectal Tumors Responding to 5-Fluorouracil Have Low Gene Expression Levels of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase, Thymidylate Synthase, and Thymidine Phosphorylase

    Dennis Salonga;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Martin Johnson;Ralf Metzger

  • Accumulation of Nuclear p53 and Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer

    David Esrig;Donald Elmajian;Susan Groshen;John A. Freeman

  • The Influence of Margin Width on Local Control of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast

    Melvin J. Silverstein;Michael D. Lagios;Susan Groshen;James R. Waisman

  • A Periodic Diet that Mimics Fasting Promotes Multi-System Regeneration, Enhanced Cognitive Performance, and Healthspan

    Sebastian Brandhorst;In Young Choi;Min Wei;Chia Wei Cheng

  • ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase mRNA Levels Predict Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Combination Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy

    Yoshinori Shirota;Jan Stoehlmacher;Jan Brabender;Yi-Ping Xiong

  • Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer: antitumor activity and toxicity modification by liposomal encapsulation.

    F M Muggia;J D Hainsworth;S Jeffers;P Miller

  • Phase II Clinical Trial of Bevacizumab and Low-Dose Metronomic Oral Cyclophosphamide in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Trial of the California, Chicago, and Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortia

    Agustin A. Garcia;Hal Hirte;Gini Fleming;Dongyun Yang

  • Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism determines response and toxicity of 5-FU chemotherapy.

    Sheeja T. Pullarkat;Jan Stoehlmacher;V. Ghaderi;Yi Ping Xiong

  • ERCC1 mRNA levels complement thymidylate synthase mRNA levels in predicting response and survival for gastric cancer patients receiving combination cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy.

    Ralf Metzger;Cynthia Gail Leichman;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Peter V. Danenberg

  • The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer : a prospective comparative trial

    Donald G. Skinner;John R. Daniels;Christy A. Russell;Gary Lieskovsky

  • Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil): Reduced clinical cardiotoxicity in patients reaching or exceeding cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2

    T. Safra;F. Muggia;S. Jeffers;D. D. Tsao-Wei

  • Quantitation of intratumoral thymidylate synthase expression predicts for disseminated colorectal cancer response and resistance to protracted-infusion fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin.

    Cynthia Gail Leichman;Heinz-Josef Lenz;Lawrence Leichman;Kathleen Danenberg

  • FCGR2A and FCGR3A Polymorphisms Associated With Clinical Outcome of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Single-Agent Cetuximab

    Wu Zhang;Michael Gordon;Anne M. Schultheis;Dong Yun Yang

  • Autoimmunity in a Phase I Trial of a Fully Human Anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 Monoclonal Antibody With Multiple Melanoma Peptides and Montanide ISA 51 for Patients With Resected Stages III and IV Melanoma

    Kristin Sanderson;Ronald Scotland;Peter Lee;Dongxin Liu

  • Risk Factors for Patients With Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases Following Radical Cystectomy With En Bloc Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: The Concept of Lymph Node Density

    John P. Stein;Jie Cai;Susan Groshen;Donald G. Skinner

  • p53 nuclear protein accumulation correlates with mutations in the p53 gene, tumor grade, and stage in bladder cancer.

    David Esrig;Charles H. Spruck;Peter W. Nichols;Benjaporn Chaiwun

  • Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer: Relationship Between Microvessel Density and Tumor Prognosis

    Bernard H. Bochner;Richard J. Cote;Noel Weidner;Susan Groshen

  • Portable Filter-Based Microdevice for Detection and Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells

    Henry K. Lin;Siyang Zheng;Anthony J. Williams;Marija Balic

  • Fasting-mimicking diet and markers/risk factors for aging, diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

    Min Wei;Sebastian Brandhorst;Mahshid Shelehchi;Hamed Mirzaei

Frequent Co-Authors

David I. Quinn
David I. Quinn University of Southern California
Donald G. Skinner
Donald G. Skinner University of Southern California
Richard J. Cote
Richard J. Cote Washington University in St. Louis
Heinz-Josef Lenz
Heinz-Josef Lenz University of Southern California
Katherine K. Matthay
Katherine K. Matthay University of California, San Francisco
Peter V. Danenberg
Peter V. Danenberg University of Southern California
Kathleen D. Danenberg
Kathleen D. Danenberg University of Southern California
John M. Maris
John M. Maris Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
C. Patrick Reynolds
C. Patrick Reynolds Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Robert C. Seeger
Robert C. Seeger Children's Hospital of Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond medical school, online programs are opening new doors. Many healthcare professionals consider advancing their education with a Master of Health Administration. If you want to move into leadership roles, take a look at some of the best online mha programs that are CAHME-accredited for high standards.

Nurses looking to progress in the field now have flexible options, too. The rn to bsn online programs without clinicals are ideal for working RNs who need to balance education and job commitments, often completing their degree faster.

For nursing professionals aiming for advanced practice or leadership, Doctor of Nursing Practice degrees are in demand. Check out the online dnp programs that can be finished in a shorter time frame, as well as the easiest dnp programs that emphasize accessibility while maintaining quality education.

These flexible online pathways make it easier than ever to grow your healthcare career and adapt to the evolving needs of the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Groshen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles