World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
20991
World Ranking
8993
National Ranking
3996

Kathleen D. Danenberg publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen D. Danenberg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 248 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kathleen D. Danenberg D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen D. Danenberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathleen D. Danenberg is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States and has contributed to research in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, including Oncology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The research focus includes topics such as Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, RNA modifications and cancer, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments.

Recent publications by Kathleen D. Danenberg include:

  • Dynamic changes in RAS gene status in circulating tumour DNA: a phase II trial of first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (2022) published in ESMO Open
  • Using cfRNA as a tool to evaluate clinical treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic lung cancers and other tumors (2021) published in Cancer Drug Resistance
  • P14.04 cfRNA from Liquid Biopsies Is More Abundant Than cfDNA, Informs Treatment Outcome and Is Concordant with Tissue (2021) published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Patient-centered developments in colon- and rectal cancer with a multidisciplinary international team: From translational research to national guidelines (2021) published in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • P15.04 A Phase I/IB Trial of Pembrolizumab and Trametinib Focused on Advanced KRAS Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (2021) published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Kathleen D. Danenberg has collaborated frequently with coauthors including Yu Sunakawa, J. Usher, P. V. Danenberg, Luis E. Raez, and Daniel Sumarriva.

The scientist's publications have appeared most often in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, alongside other venues such as ESMO Open, Cancer Drug Resistance, World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, and Cancer Medicine.

Best Publications

  • MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation

    Cindy A. Eads;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Kazuyuki Kawakami;Leonard B. Saltz

  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene and Protein and Gefitinib Sensitivity in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Federico Cappuzzo;Fred R. Hirsch;Elisa Rossi;Stefania Bartolini

  • Colorectal Tumors Responding to 5-Fluorouracil Have Low Gene Expression Levels of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase, Thymidylate Synthase, and Thymidine Phosphorylase

    Dennis Salonga;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Martin Johnson;Ralf Metzger

  • Thymidylate Synthase Gene and Protein Expression Correlate and Are Associated with Response to 5-Fluorouracil in Human Colorectal and Gastric Tumors

    Patrick G. Johnston;Heinz-Josef Lenz;Cynthia G. Leichman;Kathleen D. Danenberg

  • ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase mRNA Levels Predict Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Combination Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy

    Yoshinori Shirota;Jan Stoehlmacher;Jan Brabender;Yi-Ping Xiong

  • ERCC1 mRNA levels complement thymidylate synthase mRNA levels in predicting response and survival for gastric cancer patients receiving combination cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy.

    Ralf Metzger;Cynthia Gail Leichman;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Peter V. Danenberg

  • Quantitation of intratumoral thymidylate synthase expression predicts for disseminated colorectal cancer response and resistance to protracted-infusion fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin.

    Cynthia Gail Leichman;Heinz-Josef Lenz;Lawrence Leichman;Kathleen Danenberg

  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and HER2-neu mRNA Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Is Correlated with Survival

    Jan Brabender;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Ralf Metzger;Paul M. Schneider

  • CpG Island Hypermethylation in Human Colorectal Tumors Is Not Associated with DNA Methyltransferase Overexpression

    Cindy A. Eads;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Kazuyuki Kawakami;Leonard B. Saltz

  • Ribonucleotide Reductase Messenger RNA Expression and Survival in Gemcitabine/Cisplatin-Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

    Rafael Rosell;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Vincente Alberola;Gerold Bepler

  • ERCC1 and RRM1 gene expressions but not EGFR are predictive of shorter survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine

    P. Ceppi;M. Volante;S. Novello;I. Rapa

  • Thymidylate synthase mRNA level in adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a predictor for primary tumor response and overall survival.

    Heinz-Josef Lenz;Cynthia Gail Leichman;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Peter V. Danenberg

  • An In vivo Platform for Translational Drug Development in Pancreatic Cancer

    Belen Rubio-Viqueira;Antonio Jimeno;George Cusatis;Xianfeng Zhang

  • NAD(P)H:quinone Oxidoreductase Gene Expression in Human Colon Carcinoma Cells: Characterization of a Mutation Which Modulates DT-diaphorase Activity and Mitomycin Sensitivity

    Robert D. Traver;Tetsuro Horikoshi;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Thomas H. W. Stadlbauer

  • Hypermethylated APC DNA in Plasma and Prognosis of Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

    Kazuyuki Kawakami;Jan Brabender;Reginald V. Lord;Susan Groshen

  • Fields of aberrant CpG island hypermethylation in Barrett's esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma.

    Cindy A. Eads;Reginald V. Lord;Soudamini K. Kurumboor;Kumari Wickramasinghe

  • ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΑ ΥΨΗΛΗΣ ΠΑΡΟΧΗΣ ΓΙΑ ΑΝΑΛΥΣΗ ΜΕΘΥΛΙΩΣΗΣ DNA

    Laird Peter W;Carroll Cindy A;Danenberg Kathleen D

  • Molecular Determinants of Cetuximab Efficacy

    Daniel Vallböhmer;Wu Zhang;Michael Gordon;Dong Yun Yang

  • Different Lengths of a Polymorphic Repeat Sequence in the Thymidylate Synthase Gene Affect Translational Efficiency but Not Its Gene Expression

    Kazuyuki Kawakami;Dennis Salonga;Ji Min Park;Kathleen D. Danenberg

  • Transcripts in pretreatment biopsies from a three-arm randomized trial in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

    Rafael Rosell;Giorgio Scagliotti;Kathleen D. Danenberg;Reginald V N Lord

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter V. Danenberg
Peter V. Danenberg University of Southern California
Heinz-Josef Lenz
Heinz-Josef Lenz University of Southern California
Tom R. DeMeester
Tom R. DeMeester University of Southern California
Susan Groshen
Susan Groshen University of Southern California
Peter W. Laird
Peter W. Laird Van Andel Institute
Jeffrey A. Hagen
Jeffrey A. Hagen University of Southern California
Jeffrey H. Peters
Jeffrey H. Peters University Hospitals of Cleveland
David R. Gandara
David R. Gandara University of California, Davis
Kenichi Sugihara
Kenichi Sugihara Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Joseph R. Bertino
Joseph R. Bertino Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a diverse array of online degree programs and growing career options in the health sciences. For those interested in nutrition and human health, an online dietitian degree can lead to roles in wellness coaching, clinical nutrition, and community outreach.

Leadership roles in the healthcare sector are also in high demand. Consider pursuing one of the top cahme accredited mha programs for a strong foundation in healthcare administration. If you’re already a nurse or clinician seeking leadership without the burden of a major thesis, online dnp programs without dissertation offer flexible, practice-focused pathways.

Ambitious professionals aiming for executive or academic positions should explore doctoral programs for healthcare administration. These advanced degrees are ideal for those looking to influence policy, research, or organizational direction across the healthcare system.

Whether you seek clinical, management, or research advancement, online programs provide the flexibility to balance study with existing commitments, fueling your career path in biology and biochemistry-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen D. Danenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles