World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11399 10715 122 114 302 28257

Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2013. 13 of the 347 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2013. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1988 2025

347 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 4
1996 8
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 7
2001 9
2002 7
2003 13
2004 6
2005 7
2006 9
2007 27
2008 10
2009 4
2010 12
2011 11
2012 16
2013 32
2014 13
2015 13
2016 11
2017 17
2018 15
2019 8
2020 13
2021 8
2022 13
2023 26
2024 8
2025 5
Total 347
Download as CSV

Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 302
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant emphasis on molecular and reproductive biology.

The scientist's work covers several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Main topics addressed in their research are:

  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Testicular diseases and treatments
  • Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions

Rajpert-De Meyts has contributed to various research articles, including the following notable papers:

  • Global patterns in testicular cancer incidence and mortality in 2020, 2022, published in International Journal of Cancer
  • Application of miRNAs in the diagnosis and monitoring of testicular germ cell tumours, 2020, published in Nature Reviews Urology
  • A de novo paradigm for male infertility, 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • Variant PNLDC1, Defective piRNA Processing, and Azoospermia, 2021, published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Diverse monogenic subforms of human spermatogenic failure, 2022, published in Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Kristian Almstrup
  • Csilla Krausz
  • Anders Juul
  • Donald F. Conrad
  • Liina Nagirnaja

The scientist's work appears regularly in several publication venues, notably:

  • Andrology
  • Human Reproduction
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Genetics

Best Publications

  • Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens

    J Toppari;JC Larsen;P Christiansen;A Giwercman

  • Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility

    Niels E Skakkebaek;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Germaine M Buck Louis;Jorma Toppari

  • Public Health Implications of Altered Puberty Timing

    Mari S Golub;Gwen W Collman;Paul M D Foster;Carole A Kimmel

  • Expression of anti-müllerian hormone during normal and pathological gonadal development : Association with differentiation of Sertoli and granulosa cells

    Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Niels Jørgensen;Niels Græm;Jørn Müller

  • Developmental model for the pathogenesis of testicular carcinoma in situ: genetic and environmental aspects

    Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

  • Testicular germ cell tumours

    Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Katherine A McGlynn;Keisei Okamoto;Michael A S Jewett

  • Histological evaluation of the human testis--approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: mini review

    R.I. McLachlan;E. Rajpert-De Meyts;C.E. Hoei-Hansen;D.M. de Kretser;D.M. de Kretser

  • Nordic consensus on treatment of undescended testes

    E Martin Ritzén;Anders Bergh;R Bjerknes;P Christiansen

  • Vitamin D receptor and vitamin D metabolizing enzymes are expressed in the human male reproductive tract

    Martin Blomberg Jensen;John E Nielsen;Anne Jørgensen;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

  • Is human fecundity declining

    Niels E Skakkebaek;Niels Jørgensen;Katharina M Main;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

  • Natural history of seminiferous tubule degeneration in Klinefelter syndrome

    Lise Aksglæde;Anne M. Wikström;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Leo Dunkel

  • Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer

    J Beyer;P Albers;R Altena;J Aparicio

  • Cryptorchidism: classification, prevalence and long‐term consequences

    Helena E Virtanen;Robert Bjerknes;Dina Cortes;Niels Jørgensen

  • Impaired Leydig Cell Function in Infertile Men: A Study of 357 Idiopathic Infertile Men and 318 Proven Fertile Controls

    A.-M. Andersson;N. Jørgensen;L. Frydelund-Larsen;E. Rajpert-De Meyts

  • Embryonic stem cell-like features of testicular carcinoma in situ revealed by genome-wide gene expression profiling.

    Kristian Almstrup;Christina E. Hoei-Hansen;Ute Wirkner;Jonathon Blake

  • Germ cell cancer and disorders of spermatogenesis: An environmental connection?

    Niels E. Skakkebék;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Niels Jørgensen;Elisabeth Carlsen

  • Expression of the c-kit protein product in carcinoma-in-situ and invasive testicular germ cell tumours

    E. Rajpert-De Meyts;N. E. Skakkebkk

  • Gene polymorphisms and male infertility – a meta-analysis and literature review

    Frank Tüttelmann;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Eberhard Nieschlag;Manuela Simoni

  • Developmental expression of POU5F1 (OCT‐3/4) in normal and dysgenetic human gonads*

    Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Regina Hanstein;Regina Hanstein;Niels Jørgensen;Niels Graem

  • Carcinoma in situ in the testis

    Mikael Rørth;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Lennart Andersson;Klaus Peter Dieckmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels E. Skakkebæk
Niels E. Skakkebæk University of Copenhagen
Anders Juul
Anders Juul University of Copenhagen
Niels Jørgensen
Niels Jørgensen University of Copenhagen
Henrik Leffers
Henrik Leffers Copenhagen University Hospital
Anna-Maria Andersson
Anna-Maria Andersson University of Copenhagen
Jorma Toppari
Jorma Toppari University of Turku
Katharina M. Main
Katharina M. Main University of Copenhagen
Jirina Bartkova
Jirina Bartkova Karolinska Institute
Jørgen Holm Petersen
Jørgen Holm Petersen University of Copenhagen
Jiri Bartek
Jiri Bartek Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or supplementary degrees can expand your opportunities within the healthcare field. Many students aiming for a future in Medicine or healthcare leadership often consider accredited options that provide flexibility and career advancement.

If you're interested in healthcare management, the best online mha programs offer pathways to leadership roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations—all while studying at your own pace.

Those with a nursing background often wonder, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Many programs provide flexible options for working nurses, including some without additional clinical requirements.

If your goal is to earn an advanced practice degree quickly, consider enrolling in the fastest dnp online program. These programs are ideal for driven students seeking to maximize their clinical expertise in the shortest time possible.

For those looking to balance rigor and accessibility, you can explore the easiest online dnp programs, which offer alternative options for completing a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree with a manageable workload.

Best Scientists Citing Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles