World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
29730
World Ranking
11349
National Ranking
121

Tina Kold Jensen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Kold Jensen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 303 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tina Kold Jensen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Kold Jensen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tina Kold Jensen is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Environmental Science, with particular focus on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Environmental Chemistry, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine.

Their recent research contributions include studies on exposure to chemical substances, especially during critical developmental periods, and the health implications of environmental pollutants. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Harmonized human biomonitoring in European children, teenagers and adults: EU-wide exposure data of 11 chemical substance groups from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies (2014-2021)" (2023), published in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • "Exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances during fetal life and hospitalization for infectious disease in childhood: A study among 1,503 children from the Odense Child Cohort" (2021), Environment International
  • "Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A and autistic- and ADHD-related symptoms in children aged 2 and 5 years from the Odense Child Cohort" (2021), Environmental Health
  • "Preconception Antidiabetic Drugs in Men and Birth Defects in Offspring" (2022), Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "Harmonization of Human Biomonitoring Studies in Europe: Characteristics of the HBM4EU-Aligned Studies Participants" (2022), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Their research encompasses various main topics, including:

  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging

They have frequently published in journals such as:

  • Environment International
  • Environmental Research
  • International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
  • Human Reproduction
  • Endocrine Abstracts

Collaborations with other researchers have featured contributions from Marianne Andersen, Flemming Nielsen, Dorte Glintborg, Anna-Maria Andersson, and Hanne Frederiksen, indicating a broad network within their scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens

    J Toppari;JC Larsen;P Christiansen;A Giwercman

  • Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones among 1,558 Danish men.

    Tina Kold Jensen;Anne-Maria Andersson;Niels Jørgensen;Anne-Grethe Andersen

  • Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners

    Jens Peter E Bonde;Erik Ernst;Tina Kold Jensen;Niels Henrik I Hjollund

  • Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility

    Niels E Skakkebaek;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts;Germaine M Buck Louis;Jorma Toppari

  • BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis

    N Sermondade;C Faure;L Fezeu;A G Shayeb

  • Regional differences in semen quality in Europe.

    Niels Jørgensen;Anne-Grethe Andersen;Florence Eustache;D. Stewart Irvine

  • High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men

    A G Andersen;Tina Kold Jensen;E Carlsen;N Jørgensen

  • Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites

    Paul Elliott;David Briggs;Sara Morris;Cornelis de Hoogh

  • Inhibin B as a serum marker of spermatogenesis: correlation to differences in sperm concentration and follicle-stimulating hormone levels. A study of 349 Danish men

    Tina Kold Jensen;Anna-Maria Andersson;Niels Henrik I. Hjollund;Thomas Scheike

  • Is human fecundity declining

    Niels E Skakkebaek;Niels Jørgensen;Katharina M Main;Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts

  • East–West gradient in semen quality in the Nordic–Baltic area: a study of men from the general population in Denmark, Norway, Estonia and Finland

    Niels Jørgensen;Elisabeth Carlsen;Ingrid Nermoen;Margus Punab

  • Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities

    R. Slama;F. Eustache;B. Ducot;T.K. Jensen

  • Persistent pesticides in human breast milk and cryptorchidism.

    Ida N. Damgaard;Niels E. Skakkebæk;Jorma Toppari;Helena E. Virtanen

  • Cryptorchidism and hypospadias in sons of gardeners and farmers.

    Ida Sloth Weidner;Henrik Moller;Tina Kold Jensen;Niels E. Skakkebaek

  • Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population

    Lene Larsen;Thomas Scheike;Tina Kold Jensen;Jens Peter Bonde

  • Meta-analysis of Studies of Alcohol and Breast Cancer with Consideration of the Methodological Issues

    Jane Key;Susan Hodgson;Rumana Z. Omar;Tina K. Jensen

  • Association of In Utero Exposure to Maternal Smoking with Reduced Semen Quality and Testis Size in Adulthood: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1,770 Young Men from the General Population in Five European Countries

    Tina Kold Jensen;Niels Jørgensen;Margus Punab;Trine B. Haugen

  • Intrauterine exposure to mild analgesics is a risk factor for development of male reproductive disorders in human and rat

    David Møbjerg Boslev Kristensen;Ulla Hass;Laurianne Lesné;Grete Lottrup

  • Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men

    Niels Jørgensen;Ulla Nordström Joensen;Tina Kold Jensen;Martin Blomberg Jensen

  • Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and obesity development in humans: A review

    Jeanett Tang-Péronard;Helle Raun Andersen;Tina Kold Jensen;Berit Lilienthal Heitmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels E. Skakkebæk
Niels E. Skakkebæk University of Copenhagen
Niels Jørgensen
Niels Jørgensen University of Copenhagen
Anna-Maria Andersson
Anna-Maria Andersson University of Copenhagen
Philippe Grandjean
Philippe Grandjean University of Southern Denmark
Anders Juul
Anders Juul University of Copenhagen
Katharina M. Main
Katharina M. Main University of Copenhagen
Jørgen Holm Petersen
Jørgen Holm Petersen University of Copenhagen
Jorma Toppari
Jorma Toppari University of Turku
Niels Keiding
Niels Keiding University of Copenhagen
Jens Peter Bonde
Jens Peter Bonde University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of medical and healthcare education in the USA continues to evolve, with more students exploring flexible online pathways. Many professionals begin their journey with bridge programs, such as asn to nurse practitioner programs, which offer a streamlined route for registered nurses to advance their careers and take on greater responsibilities in clinical practice.

Parallel to traditional medical studies, specialized fields like nutrition have grown in demand. Online nutrition degrees can open doors to diverse careers including dietetics, health coaching, and wellness consulting, all while allowing students to study at their own pace.

For those looking to transition into leadership roles in healthcare systems, accredited options are essential. Cahme accredited online mha programs ensure high standards in curriculum, preparing graduates for management positions in hospitals, clinics, and beyond.

Additionally, increased demand for registered nurses has led to innovative programs like rn to bsn programs without clinicals, offering academic advancement that fits busy schedules. These online degrees and pathways provide essential flexibility and can serve as valuable stepping stones for anyone considering a career in medicine or healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Tina Kold Jensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles