World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Jeffrey A. Hagen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey A. Hagen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeffrey A. Hagen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey A. Hagen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey A. Hagen is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Surgery. They have contributed to several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Physiology, and Oncology.

The main topics addressed in their body of work encompass:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Surgical Simulation and Training

Their recent publications include:

  • "Clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with GERD and PPI refractory heartburn," 2020, Diseases of the Esophagus
  • "Consensus for Thoracoscopic Left Upper Lobectomy-Essential Components and Targets for Simulation," 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • "Adequacy of EGD Reporting: a Review of 100 Reports from 100 Endoscopists," 2020, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • "Chemoimmunotherapy for oesophageal cancer: the next step on the path towards better outcomes," 2022, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • "Tumour location predicts occult N1 nodal metastases in clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: is location alone sufficient to justify limiting the extent of resection?," 2023, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Jeffrey A. Hagen frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Diseases of the Esophagus
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • JTCVS Open

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Daniel Oh
  • Steven R. DeMeester
  • Mara B. Antonoff
  • Jessica Donington
  • Christopher W. Seder

Best Publications

  • The Number of Lymph Nodes Removed Predicts Survival in Esophageal Cancer: An International Study on the Impact of Extent of Surgical Resection

    Christian G Peyre;Jeffrey A Hagen;Steven R DeMeester;Nasser K Altorki

  • Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate.

    Majid Hashemi;Jeffrey H Peters;Tom R DeMeester;James E Huprich

  • Mixed reflux of gastric and duodenal juices is more harmful to the esophagus than gastric juice alone. The need for surgical therapy re-emphasized.

    Werner K. H. Kauer;Jeffrey H. Peters;Tom R. DeMeester;Adrian P. Ireland

  • Genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in lung adenocarcinoma and integration with mRNA expression

    Suhaida A. Selamat;Brian S. Chung;Luc Girard;Wei Zhang

  • Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies.

    Jeffrey A. Hagen;Steven R. DeMeester;Jeffrey H. Peters;Para Chandrasoma

  • Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: Gastric pull-up versus colon interposition

    John W Briel;Anand P Tamhankar;Jeffrey A Hagen;Steven R DeMeester

  • Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

    Guilherme M.R. Campos;Jeffrey H. Peters;Tom R. DeMeester;Stefan Öberg

  • Inflammation and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

    Stefan Öberg;Jeffrey H. Peters;Tom R. DeMeester;Para Chandrasoma

  • The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: prospective evaluation of 100 patients with "typical" symptoms.

    J H Peters;T R DeMeester;P Crookes;S Oberg

  • DNA methylation analysis: a powerful new tool for lung cancer diagnosis

    Jeffrey A Tsou;Jeffrey A Hagen;Catherine L Carpenter;Ite A Laird-Offringa

  • The prevalence of lymph node metastases in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma a retrospective review of esophagectomy specimens.

    Jessica M. Leers;Steven R. DeMeester;Arzu Oezcelik;Nancy Klipfel

  • Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes.

    Christian G. Peyre;Jeffrey A. Hagen;Steven R. DeMeester;Jan J. B. Van Lanschot

  • Suppression of gastric acid secretion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease results in gastric bacterial overgrowth and deconjugation of bile acids

    Jörg Theisen;Dhiren Nehra;Diane Citron;Jan Johansson

  • Living-donor lobar lung transplantation experience: Intermediate results

    Vaughn A. Starnes;Mark L. Barr;Robbin G. Cohen;Jeffrey A. Hagen

  • Superiority of extended en bloc esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the lower esophagus and cardia.

    Jeffrey A. Hagen;Jeffrey H. Peters;Tom R. DeMeester

  • Occult esophageal adenocarcinoma: extent of disease and implications for effective therapy.

    John J. Nigro;Jeffrey A. Hagen;Tom R. DeMeester;Steven R. DeMeester

  • Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

    Jörg Zehetner;Steven R. DeMeester;Evan T. Alicuben;Daniel S. Oh

  • Obesity and Gastroesophageal Reflux: Quantifying the Association Between Body Mass Index, Esophageal Acid Exposure, and Lower Esophageal Sphincter Status in a Large Series of Patients with Reflux Symptoms

    Shahin Ayazi;Jeffrey A. Hagen;Linda S. Chan;Steven R. DeMeester

  • Long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

    Wayne L. Hofstetter;Jeffrey H. Peters;Tom R. DeMeester;Jeffrey A. Hagen

  • A New Technique for Measurement of Pharyngeal pH: Normal Values and Discriminating pH Threshold

    S. Ayazi;J. C. Lipham;J. A. Hagen;A. L. Tang

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom R. DeMeester
Tom R. DeMeester University of Southern California
Jeffrey H. Peters
Jeffrey H. Peters University Hospitals of Cleveland
Peter V. Danenberg
Peter V. Danenberg University of Southern California
Kathleen D. Danenberg
Kathleen D. Danenberg University of Southern California
Peter W. Laird
Peter W. Laird Van Andel Institute
Jan Johansson
Jan Johansson Karolinska Institute
Kimberly D. Siegmund
Kimberly D. Siegmund University of Southern California
Michael Koss
Michael Koss ETH Zurich
Gaurav Sharma
Gaurav Sharma University of Rochester
Thomas W. Rice
Thomas W. Rice University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA can be a long and expensive journey. However, there are alternative online routes in healthcare that offer flexible entry points into the industry and opportunities for career advancement.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, a low cost medical coding and billing online program can be an affordable way to gain essential skills quickly. These programs often lead to in-demand roles in hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies.

Aspiring nurses have multiple pathways to start and advance their careers. A cheapest bsn programs online can be a cost-effective way to earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing and become a registered nurse, while working or managing family life.

For those who already have nursing experience, advancing to specialized or leadership roles is possible through cheapest online nurse practitioner programs or pursuing an online phd nursing programs. These programs enable working professionals to pursue advanced degrees online, opening up further career opportunities and potential for higher income.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey A. Hagen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles