World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
15168
World Ranking
13012
National Ranking
5547

Kimberly D. Siegmund publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly D. Siegmund sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 246 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kimberly D. Siegmund D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly D. Siegmund sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kimberly D. Siegmund is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine.

The main fields in which they have published include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Siegmund's work further delves into specific subfields such as molecular biology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, and oncology.

Their research covers a variety of scientific topics. The main areas of interest comprise:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

They have published research in several journals and venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Reports
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Siegmund has collaborated extensively with a set of frequent co-authors including:

  • Loïc Le Marchand
  • Siamak Daneshmand
  • Paul Marjoram
  • Suhn K. Rhie
  • Darryl Shibata

Their recent publications highlight a range of research topics and methodologies. Selected papers include:

  • Inter-individual variability in structural brain development from late childhood to young adulthood, 2021, NeuroImage
  • The genome-wide impact of trisomy 21 on DNA methylation and its implications for hematopoiesis, 2021, Nature Communications
  • A novel role for vaping in mitochondrial gene dysregulation and inflammation fundamental to disease development, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Cell-free DNA Methylation as a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in SWOG S1314, 2023, European Urology Oncology
  • DNA Methylation Profiles of Vegans and Non-Vegetarians in the Adventist Health Study-2 Cohort, 2020, Nutrients

Best Publications

  • CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer.

    Daniel J Weisenberger;Kimberly D Siegmund;Mihaela Campan;Joanne Young

  • A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth

    Andrea Sottoriva;Haeyoun Kang;Zhicheng Ma;Trevor A Graham

  • Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays

    Timothy J. Triche;Daniel J. Weisenberger;David Van Den Berg;Peter W. Laird

  • Lower Cancer Incidence in Amsterdam-I Criteria Families Without Mismatch Repair Deficiency: Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X

    Noralane M. Lindor;Kari Rabe;Gloria M. Petersen;Robert Haile

  • DNA Methylation in the Human Cerebral Cortex Is Dynamically Regulated throughout the Life Span and Involves Differentiated Neurons

    Kimberly D. Siegmund;Caroline M. Connor;Mihaela Campan;Tiffany I. Long

  • Genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in lung adenocarcinoma and integration with mRNA expression

    Suhaida A. Selamat;Brian S. Chung;Luc Girard;Wei Zhang

  • Association of Breast Cancer DNA Methylation Profiles with Hormone Receptor Status and Response to Tamoxifen

    Martin Widschwendter;Kimberly D. Siegmund;Peter A. Jones;Peter W. Laird

  • Recommendations for the design and analysis of epigenome-wide association studies

    Karin B Michels;Alexandra M Binder;Sarah Dedeurwaerder;Charles B Epstein

  • Hypomethylation of a LINE-1 promoter activates an alternate transcript of the MET oncogene in bladders with cancer.

    Erika M. Wolff;Hyang-Min Byun;Han F. Han;Shikhar Sharma

  • Widespread epigenetic abnormalities suggest a broad DNA methylation erasure defect in abnormal human sperm

    Sahar Houshdaran;Victoria K. Cortessis;Kimberly D. Siegmund;Allen Yang

  • Environmental epigenetics: prospects for studying epigenetic mediation of exposure–response relationships

    Victoria K. Cortessis;Duncan C. Thomas;A. Joan Levine;Carrie V. Breton

  • Epigenetic profiling of somatic tissues from human autopsy specimens identifies tissue- and individual-specific DNA methylation patterns

    Hyang-Min Byun;Kimberly D. Siegmund;Fei Pan;Daniel J. Weisenberger

  • Bis-SNP: Combined DNA methylation and SNP calling for Bisulfite-seq data

    Yaping Liu;Kimberly D Siegmund;Peter W Laird;Benjamin P Berman

  • Detection of Methylated Apoptosis-Associated Genes in Urine Sediments of Bladder Cancer Patients

    Martin G. Friedrich;Daniel J. Weisenberger;Jonathan C. Cheng;Shahin Chandrasoma

  • Molecular characterization of MSI-H colorectal cancer by MLHI promoter methylation, immunohistochemistry, and mismatch repair germline mutation screening

    Jenny N. Poynter;Kimberly D. Siegmund;Daniel J. Weisenberger;Tiffany I. Long

  • Unique DNA methylation patterns distinguish noninvasive and invasive urothelial cancers and establish an epigenetic field defect in premalignant tissue.

    Erika M. Wolff;Yoshitomo Chihara;Fei Pan;Daniel J. Weisenberger

  • The PREMM1,2,6 Model Predicts Risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 Germline Mutations Based on Cancer History

    Fay Kastrinos;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Rowena Mercado;Judith Balmaña

  • Inferring clonal expansion and cancer stem cell dynamics from DNA methylation patterns in colorectal cancers

    Kimberly D. Siegmund;Paul Marjoram;Yen-Jung Woo;Simon Tavaré

  • The Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase 677C→T Polymorphism and Distal Colorectal Adenoma Risk

    A J Levine;K D Siegmund;C M Ervin;A Diep

  • Prognostic relevance of methylation markers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma

    Martin G. Friedrich;Martin G. Friedrich;Shahin Chandrasoma;Kimberly D. Siegmund;Daniel J. Weisenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter W. Laird
Peter W. Laird Van Andel Institute
Daniel J. Weisenberger
Daniel J. Weisenberger University of Southern California
Gangning Liang
Gangning Liang University of Southern California
Peter A. Jones
Peter A. Jones Van Andel Institute
Robert W. Haile
Robert W. Haile Stanford University
Simon Tavaré
Simon Tavaré Columbia University
Frank D. Gilliland
Frank D. Gilliland University of Southern California
Loic Le Marchand
Loic Le Marchand University of Hawaii at Manoa
David V. Conti
David V. Conti University of Southern California
Hyang-Min Byun
Hyang-Min Byun Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Biology and Biochemistry, there are numerous pathways to apply your skills in healthcare and research. Online education makes it easier to advance your career or explore new fields, offering flexibility for busy schedules and working professionals.

If you’re interested in nutrition science, you may consider dietetic masters programs, which prepare graduates for careers as registered dietitians or nutrition experts. Those looking to quickly start a healthcare role can explore medical assistant programs online michigan for entry-level clinical and administrative roles.

Career advancement is within reach through bridge programs—such as the medical assistant to lpn bridge program online, allowing medical assistants to step into licensed practical nursing roles. For those seeking a robust science background in less time, an accelerated bachelor's degree in biology online is a fast-track way to empower your career in research, education, or health sciences.

Exploring these online degrees opens doors to a wide range of professional opportunities and specializations in the dynamic field of life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly D. Siegmund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles