World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henny P. A. Boshuizen

Henny P. A. Boshuizen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
16470
World Ranking
4137
National Ranking
441

Henny P. A. Boshuizen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henny P. A. Boshuizen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Henny P. A. Boshuizen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henny P. A. Boshuizen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henny P. A. Boshuizen is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom, contributing to research primarily within social sciences, psychology, and medicine. Their work spans several intersecting fields with a particular emphasis on education and developmental and educational psychology.

The main topics of Boshuizen's research include innovations in medical education, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, higher education learning practices, visual and cognitive learning processes, educational and psychological assessments, innovative education and learning practices, and global educational policies and reforms.

Frequent publication venues for Boshuizen's work are:

  • Vocations and Learning
  • International Journal of Educational Research
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Educational Research Review
  • The Curriculum Journal

Boshuizen has collaborated regularly with a core group of coauthors, including Halszka Jarodzka, Hans Gruber, Joyce Vreuls, Mieke Koeslag-Kreunen, and Marcel van der Klink.

Recent publications by Boshuizen and colleagues illustrate diverse interests across education and medical studies:

  • Knowledge restructuring through case processing: The key to generalise expertise development theory across domains? (2020), Educational Research Review
  • Misconceptions in medicine, their origin and development in education and working life (2020), International Journal of Educational Research
  • Responsive curriculum development for professional education: Different teams, different tales (2022), The Curriculum Journal
  • Learning Professional Knowledge: Bachelor Nursing Students' Experiences in Learning and Knowledge Quality Outcomes in a Competence-Based Curriculum (2021), Vocations and Learning
  • Classroom Management Scripts: a Theoretical Model Contrasting Expert and Novice Teachers' Knowledge and Awareness of Classroom Events (2020), Educational Psychology Review

Their contributions to educational research particularly focus on how expertise develops through case processing, curriculum responsiveness in professional education, and the intersection of knowledge and misconceptions in medical practice. This work addresses cognitive and learning processes relevant to both clinical and educational settings.

Best Publications

  • A Cognitive Perspective on Medical Expertise: Theory and Implications

    Henk Schmidt;Geoffrey Norman;Henny Boshuizen

  • On the Role of Biomedical Knowledge in Clinical Reasoning by Experts, Intermediates and Novices

    Henny P.A. Boshuizen;Henk G. Schmidt

  • Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning

    Tim Dornan;Henny Boshuizen;Nigel King;Albert Scherpbier

  • Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research.

    Bernard Charlin;Jacques Tardif;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • Scripts and clinical reasoning.

    Bernard Charlin;Henny P A Boshuizen;Eugene J Custers;Paul J Feltovich

  • On Acquiring Expertise in Medicine

    Henk G. Schmidt;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • General competencies of problem-based learning (PBL) and non-PBL graduates.

    Katinka J A H Prince;Patrick W L J van Eijs;Henny P A Boshuizen;Cees P M van der Vleuten

  • How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information

    Amber Walraven;Saskia Brand-Gruwel;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • Self-Regulation in Higher Education Teacher Learning.

    I. M. Van Eekelen;H. P. A. Boshuizen;J. D. Vermunt

  • Exploring teachers’ will to learn

    I.M. Van Eekelen;J.D. Vermunt;H.P.A. Boshuizen

  • The development of diagnostic competence: Comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum

    Henk Schmidt;M. Machiels-Bongaerts;Helene Hermans;O. ten Cate

  • Students' opinions about their preparation for clinical practice

    Katinka J A H Prince;Henny P A Boshuizen;Cees P M van der Vleuten;Albert J J A Scherpbier

  • Teachers' Positioning towards an Educational Innovation in the Light of Ownership, Sense-Making and Agency.

    Evelien Ketelaar;Evelien Ketelaar;Douwe Beijaard;Henny P.A. Boshuizen;Perry J. Den Brok

  • On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall

    Henk G. Schmidt;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • Problem Based Learning: Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes during Problem Analysis

    W.S. de Grave;Henny Boshuizen;Henk Schmidt

  • Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions

    Amber Walraven;Saskia Brand-gruwel;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • Teacher vision: expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes

    Charlotte E. Wolff;Halszka Jarodzka;Halszka Jarodzka;Niek van den Bogert;Henny P. A. Boshuizen;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • Keeping an Eye on Learning: Differences Between Expert and Novice Teachers’ Representations of Classroom Management Events

    Charlotte E. Wolff;Niek van den Bogert;Halszka Jarodzka;Henny P. A. Boshuizen

  • Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert

    Henny P. A. Boshuizen;Rainer Bromme;Hans Gruber

  • The development of clinical reasoning expertise

    H.P.A. Boshuizen;Henk Schmidt

  • Learning with Multiple Representations. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series.

    Maarten W. van Someren;Peter Reimann;Henny P. A. Boshuizen;Ton de Jong

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Wim H. Gijselaers
Wim H. Gijselaers Maastricht University
Tim Dornan
Tim Dornan Queen's University Belfast
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Jan D. Vermunt
Jan D. Vermunt Eindhoven University of Technology
Tamara van Gog
Tamara van Gog Utrecht University
Remy M. J. P. Rikers
Remy M. J. P. Rikers Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to many rewarding online degrees and career opportunities, particularly in the field of substance abuse counseling. Online psychology programs can provide the foundational skills and knowledge needed to enter specialized roles that help individuals and communities thrive.

Whether you are interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Richmond or want to explore Riverside substance abuse counselors education requirements, each region may have specific criteria. These often include earning a relevant degree, gaining supervised experience, and obtaining licensure.

For those focused on California, it’s important to understand the substance abuse counselor requirements in Sacramento. Similarly, other states like Minnesota have their own regulations, such as the Saint Paul substance abuse counselors education requirements. Online degree pathways not only offer flexibility but also support preparation for these specific career goals.

No matter where you choose to practice, online psychology degrees and certifications make it possible to enter a variety of fulfilling roles in mental health and counseling across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Henny P. A. Boshuizen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles