World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
10755
World Ranking
4813
National Ranking
2658

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
13423
World Ranking
2945
National Ranking
1447

Gloria Mark publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gloria Mark sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 210 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gloria Mark D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gloria Mark sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gloria Mark is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions in subfields such as sociology and political science, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work extensively addresses topics related to digital mental health interventions, mental health research, behavioral health and interventions, the impact of technology on adolescents, sleep and related disorders, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and knowledge management and sharing.

Several recent publications highlight Gloria Mark's research output. These include:

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Tell Me About Yourself, 2020, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • The effects of seasons and weather on sleep patterns measured through longitudinal multimodal sensing, 2021, npj Digital Medicine
  • Physicians' electronic inbox work patterns and factors associated with high inbox work duration, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Understanding Mental Health App Use Among Community College Students: Web-Based Survey Study, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent collaborators include Aaron Striegel, Ted Grover, Gonzalo J. Martinez, Stephen M. Mattingly, and Sidney K. D'Mello. These coauthors have worked with Gloria Mark on multiple projects, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Gloria Mark's publications are commonly found in venues such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Journal of Medical Internet Research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, PLoS ONE, and JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

Best Publications

  • "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres

    Victor M. González;Gloria Mark

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

    Judith Borghouts;Elizabeth Eikey;Gloria Mark;Cinthia De Leon

  • The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress

    Gloria Mark;Daniela Gudith;Ulrich Klocke

  • No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work

    Gloria Mark;Victor M. Gonzalez;Justin Harris

  • A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters

    Leysia Palen;Kenneth M. Anderson;Gloria Mark;James Martin

  • The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure

    Charlotte P. Lee;Paul Dourish;Gloria Mark

  • Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception

    Erin Bradner;Gloria Mark

  • "A pace not dictated by electrons": an empirical study of work without email

    Gloria Mark;Stephen Voida;Armand Cardello

  • Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts

    Gloria Mark;Kalle Lyytinen;Mark Bergman

  • Extreme collaboration

    Gloria Mark

  • Email Duration, Batching and Self-interruption: Patterns of Email Use on Productivity and Stress

    Gloria Mark;Shamsi T. Iqbal;Mary Czerwinski;Paul Johns

  • Meeting at the desktop: an empirical study of virtually collocated teams

    Gloria Mark;Jonathan Grudin;Steven E. Poltrock

  • Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption

    Laura Dabbish;Gloria Mark;Víctor M. González

  • Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity

    Gloria Mark;Yiran Wang;Melissa Niiya

  • Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace

    Gloria Mark;Shamsi T. Iqbal;Mary Czerwinski;Paul Johns

  • Managing currents of work: multi-tasking among multiple collaborations

    Victor M. González;Gloria Mark

  • Tell Me About Yourself: Using an AI-Powered Chatbot to Conduct Conversational Surveys with Open-ended Questions

    Ziang Xiao;Michelle X. Zhou;Q. Vera Liao;Gloria Mark

  • Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups

    Gloria Mark

  • Resilience in collaboration: technology as a resource for new patterns of action

    Gloria Mark;Bryan Semaan

  • Pocket Skills: A Conversational Mobile Web App To Support Dialectical Behavioral Therapy

    Jessica Schroeder;Chelsey Wilkes;Kael Rowan;Arturo Toledo

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Shamsi T. Iqbal
Shamsi T. Iqbal Microsoft (United States)
Munmun De Choudhury
Munmun De Choudhury Georgia Institute of Technology
Sidney K. D'Mello
Sidney K. D'Mello University of Colorado Boulder
Michelle X. Zhou
Michelle X. Zhou IBM (United States)
Nitesh V. Chawla
Nitesh V. Chawla University of Notre Dame
Anind K. Dey
Anind K. Dey University of Washington
Volker Wulf
Volker Wulf University of Siegen
Andrew T. Campbell
Andrew T. Campbell Dartmouth College
Susan R. Fussell
Susan R. Fussell Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree options and alternative career pathways. Many students are now choosing flexible study plans, such as a fast track associates degree online, to quickly start their tech careers or pivot into IT from other fields.

For those interested in the business side of technology, online business degrees are a valuable pathway. These degrees build essential leadership and management skills linked to the digital economy.

Budget is often a key consideration. Seeking out the cheapest online colleges can make achieving your academic goals more affordable without sacrificing quality. This ensures a solid return on investment as you enter the workforce.

For students with a strong interest in technology and problem-solving, pursuing an engineer degree online is another excellent option. This pathway complements computer science skills and leads to a wide range of innovative career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Gloria Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles