World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6827
World Ranking
9303
National Ranking
3956

Werner Geyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Geyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Werner Geyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Geyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Werner Geyer is affiliated with IBM in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research primarily focuses on areas intersecting Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Law, Sociology and Political Science, and Information Systems and Management.

The scientist has contributed to several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Information Systems and Management

Werner's research topics cover a range of themes such as:

  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Topic Modeling
  • Open Source Software Innovations

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Zahra Ashktorab
  • Casey Dugan
  • Michael Desmond
  • Elizabeth Daly
  • Martín Santillán Cooper

Werner Geyer has published in several notable venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Selected recent publications are as follows:

  • Experiments on Motivational Feedback for Crowdsourced Workers, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Helping the Helper: Supporting Peer Counselors via AI-Empowered Practice and Feedback, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Helping the Helper: Supporting Peer Counselors via AI-Empowered Practice and Feedback, 2025, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • EvalAssist: LLM-as-a-Judge Simplified, 2025, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • Motivations for social networking at work

    Joan DiMicco;David R. Millen;Werner Geyer;Casey Dugan

  • Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites

    Jilin Chen;Werner Geyer;Casey Dugan;Michael Muller

  • Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AI

    Dakuo Wang;Justin D. Weisz;Michael Muller;Parikshit Ram

  • Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise

    Rosta Farzan;Joan M. DiMicco;David R. Millen;Casey Dugan

  • People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site

    Joan Morris DiMicco;Werner Geyer;David R. Millen;Casey Dugan

  • Multi-column user interface for managing on-line threaded conversations

    Elizabeth A. Brownholtz;Werner Geyer;Bernard J. Kerr;David R. Millen

  • Enhanced instant message status message area containing time/date stamped entries and editable by others

    Richard Wilson;Paul Moody;Jonathan Feinberg;Werner Geyer

  • Method and apparatus for persistent real-time collaboration

    Werner Geyer;Michael Muller;Elizabeth Anne Brownholtz;David Ryant Millen

  • Intra- and inter-stream synchronisation for stored multimedia streams

    E. Biersack;W. Geyer;C. Bernhardt

  • One-hundred days in an activity-centric collaboration environment based on shared objects

    Michael J. Muller;Werner Geyer;Beth Brownholtz;Eric Wilcox

  • All Work and No Play

    Q. Vera Liao;Muhammed Mas-ud Hussain;Praveen Chandar;Matthew Davis

  • A team collaboration space supporting capture and access of virtual meetings

    Werner Geyer;Heather Richter;Ludwin Fuchs;Tom Frauenhofer

  • Integrating Meeting Capture within a Collaborative Team Environment

    Heather A. Richter;Gregory D. Abowd;Werner Geyer;Ludwin Fuchs

  • Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration

    Michael Muller;Werner Geyer;Todd Soule;Steven Daniels

  • Increasing engagement through early recommender intervention

    Jill Freyne;Michal Jacovi;Ido Guy;Werner Geyer

  • Mental Models of AI Agents in a Cooperative Game Setting

    Katy Ilonka Gero;Zahra Ashktorab;Casey Dugan;Qian Pan

  • What Can You Do?: Studying Social-Agent Orientation and Agent Proactive Interactions with an Agent for Employees

    Q. Vera Liao;Matthew Davis;Werner Geyer;Michael Muller

  • Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    Shilad Sen;Werner Geyer;Jill Freyne;Pablo Castells

  • Supporting activity-centric collaboration through peer-to-peer shared objects

    Werner Geyer;Jürgen Vogel;Li-Te Cheng;Michael Muller

  • Experiments on Motivational Feedback for Crowdsourced Workers

    Tak Yeon Lee;Casey Dugan;Werner Geyer;Tristan Ratchford

  • Towards a Smarter Meeting Record--Capture and Access of Meetings Revisited

    Werner Geyer;Heather Richter;Gregory D. Abowd

  • Recommending topics for self-descriptions in online user profiles

    Werner Geyer;Casey Dugan;David R. Millen;Michael Muller

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Muller
Michael Muller IBM (United States)
David R. Millen
David R. Millen IBM (United States)
Wolfgang Effelsberg
Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim
Martin Mauve
Martin Mauve Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Gregory D. Abowd
Gregory D. Abowd Northeastern University
Pablo Castells
Pablo Castells Autonomous University of Madrid
Bamshad Mobasher
Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University
David Redmiles
David Redmiles University of California, Irvine
Dietmar Jannach
Dietmar Jannach University of Klagenfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science studies in the USA can open doors to a variety of affordable online degree programs that fit different budgets and lifestyles. Many reputable universities now offer flexible online courses, making it easier to balance education with other commitments.

If you’re concerned about your academic background, consider applying to online graduate schools with low gpa requirements. These institutions often provide accessible entry points for students looking to shift or advance their careers without traditional barriers.

A background in computer science also provides the flexibility to explore interdisciplinary roles. For instance, jobs with jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree or other specialized fields are available for those who wish to merge tech skills with environmental or educational sectors.

For those eager to fast-track their learning, consider a online computer science degree that offers accelerated pathways. These programs are ideal for students wanting to enter the workforce quickly or transition careers efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Werner Geyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles