World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
86
Citations
37802
World Ranking
753
National Ranking
401

Ed H. Chi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed H. Chi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 345 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ed H. Chi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed H. Chi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • World Wide Web
  • Law

Ed H. Chi mainly focuses on World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Cluster analysis, Human–computer interaction and Visualization. His research integrates issues of Information seeking, User modeling, Sensemaking and Internet privacy in his study of World Wide Web. His work deals with themes such as Information scent, Word and Reading, which intersect with Information retrieval.

Ed H. Chi focuses mostly in the field of Cluster analysis, narrowing it down to topics relating to Similarity and, in certain cases, Object. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Information visualization, Data visualization and Data science. Ed H. Chi has included themes like Social computing, Web design, Web development, Web-based simulation and Data Web in his Visualization study.

His most cited work include:

  • Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk (1544 citations)
  • Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network (876 citations)
  • He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia (464 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ed H. Chi mostly deals with World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Artificial intelligence, Recommender system and Machine learning. His World Wide Web research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Information seeking, Internet privacy and Reading. His studies deal with areas such as Annotation, Set, Data mining and Information needs as well as Information retrieval.

His Data mining research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Similarity and Cluster analysis. The Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Pattern recognition, Task and Natural language processing. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Recommender system, focusing on Human–computer interaction and, on occasion, User modeling.

He most often published in these fields:

  • World Wide Web (29.19%)
  • Information retrieval (23.91%)
  • Artificial intelligence (17.08%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (17.08%)
  • Recommender system (15.53%)
  • Machine learning (11.80%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Artificial intelligence, Recommender system, Machine learning, Artificial neural network and Ranking. His research investigates the link between Artificial intelligence and topics such as Task that cross with problems in Representation and Perspective. Recommender system is a subfield of Information retrieval that Ed H. Chi investigates.

His Information retrieval research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Transfer of learning and Task. His study on Regularization is often connected to Quality as part of broader study in Machine learning. The concepts of his Artificial neural network study are interwoven with issues in Ensemble forecasting and Encoding.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender System (99 citations)
  • Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons (84 citations)
  • SageDB: A Learned Database System (74 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Law

Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Recommender system, Ranking and Computation are his primary areas of study. His Artificial intelligence research incorporates elements of Domain and User experience design. His work in the fields of Machine learning, such as Artificial neural network, intersects with other areas such as Long range dependent and Dynamics.

His Recommender system study is concerned with the larger field of Information retrieval. His Computation study which covers Overhead that intersects with Theoretical computer science and Recurrent neural network. The various areas that Ed H. Chi examines in his Data science study include Contextual image classification and Product.

Best Publications

  • Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models

    Unknown

  • Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk

    Aniket Kittur;Ed H. Chi;Bongwon Suh

  • Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models

    Unknown

  • Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models

    Unknown

  • Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network

    Bongwon Suh;Lichan Hong;Peter Pirolli;Ed H. Chi

  • Modeling Task Relationships in Multi-task Learning with Multi-gate Mixture-of-Experts

    Jiaqi Ma;Zhe Zhao;Xinyang Yi;Jilin Chen

  • The Case for Learned Index Structures

    Tim Kraska;Alex Beutel;Ed H. Chi;Jeffrey Dean

  • A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model

    E.H. Chi

  • He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia

    Aniket Kittur;Bongwon Suh;Bryan A. Pendleton;Ed H. Chi

  • Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models

    Unknown

  • Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles

    Brent Hecht;Lichan Hong;Bongwon Suh;Ed H. Chi

  • Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web

    Ed H. Chi;Peter Pirolli;Kim Chen;James Pitkow

  • Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams

    Jilin Chen;Rowan Nairn;Les Nelson;Michael Bernstein

  • System and method for clustering data objects in a collection

    Hinrich Schuetze;Peter L. Pirolli;James E. Pitkow;Ed H. Chi

  • DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systems

    Ruoxi Wang;Rakesh Shivanna;Derek Z. Cheng;Sagar Jain

  • System and method for providing recommendations based on multi-modal user clusters

    Hinrich Schuetze;James E. Pitkow;Peter L. Pirolli;Ed H. Chi

  • Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representations

    Alex Beutel;Ed H. Chi;Jilin Chen;Zhe Zhao

  • Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender System

    Minmin Chen;Alex Beutel;Paul Covington;Sagar Jain

  • ScentTrails: Integrating browsing and searching on the Web

    Christopher Olston;Ed H. Chi

  • An operator interaction framework for visualization systems

    Ed Huai-Hsin Chi;J.T. Riedl

  • Latent Cross: Making Use of Context in Recurrent Recommender Systems

    Alex Beutel;Paul Covington;Sagar Jain;Can Xu

  • Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons

    Alex Beutel;Jilin Chen;Tulsee Doshi;Hai Qian

  • The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site

    Ed H. Chi;Peter Pirolli;James Pitkow

  • System and method for quantitatively representing data objects in vector space

    Hinrich Schuetze;Francine R. Chen;Peter L. Pirolli;James E. Pitkow

  • Recommending what video to watch next: a multitask ranking system

    Zhe Zhao;Lichan Hong;Li Wei;Jilin Chen

  • Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Joseph A. Konstan;Ed H. Chi;Kristina Höök

Frequent Co-Authors

Lichan Hong
Lichan Hong Google (United States)
Peter Pirolli
Peter Pirolli Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
James E. Pitkow
James E. Pitkow Palo Alto Research Center
Stuart K. Card
Stuart K. Card Stanford University
John Riedl
John Riedl University of Minnesota
Aniket Kittur
Aniket Kittur Carnegie Mellon University
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Victoria Bellotti
Victoria Bellotti Palo Alto Research Center
Jock D. Mackinlay
Jock D. Mackinlay Tableau Software (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up diverse opportunities through online education. Many students begin with online associate degree programs, which offer a fast and flexible route into the tech field. For those concerned about affordability, it’s important to research the cheapest online degrees to reduce financial barriers and avoid unnecessary debt.

Don't let academic history limit your ambition—there are options for those who may not have a perfect academic record. Consider enrolling at a college that accepts low gpa. These institutions can help you build a strong foundation and pursue your educational goals without judgment.

Finally, computer science knowledge blends well with other fields. For instance, graduates often ask, what can you do with an environmental science degree? The digital skills you gain can open doors to interdisciplinary careers in technology, sustainability, and data analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Ed H. Chi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles